Follow this blog:
RSS

Wind turbine explodes, generates controversy [video]

By | December 16, 2011, 5:46 AM PST

Wind turbines, often depicted twirling benignly in against a serene hilly backdrop, has become somewhat of a poster child for renewable energy. But the technology received a bit of bad publicity recently when one of the massive structures exploded at wind farm in Ardrossan, Scotland.

The disaster was part of the widespread destruction left behind as a powerful Atlantic storm that packed high winds whipping at speeds of up to 165 mph ripped through the British Isles. In its wake, about a 150,000 homes were suddenly left without power partly because a wide network of the energy-generating sites were forced to shut down temporarily, a sequence of events that has once again stirred up doubts over the long term viability of wind power.

Seizing on the opportunity, the Country Guardian, an anti-wind power organization, released a statement to the Sunday Express:

“There is a general trend upward in accident numbers over the past 10 years. This is predicted to escalate unless the Health and Safety Executive makes some significant changes, in particular to protect the public by declaring a minimum safe distance between new turbine developments and occupied housing and buildings (currently 2km in Europe), and declaring ‘no-go’ areas to the public.”

Proponents on the other side of the debate have played down the explosion as a “freak accident.
Charles Anglin, of the trade organization RenewableUK, told the Press Association, “There’s some pretty freak weather going on and any piece of large power generating equipment can be subject to freak accidents or mechanical faults.

“But there’s an excellent health and safety record, and it was only a small fire in a field that was put out before the fire brigade got there, and no one was hurt. In stressful situations any power equipment may develop faults, and that’s true of gas, nuclear, oil, and is also true of wind.”

But what’s especially troubling is that these types of malfunctions aren’t supposed to happen since wind turbines are designed with safety features that kick in whenever there are excessively strong winds. This enables them to operate in places with consistent gusts such as offshore sites and rural swaths of land. The manufacturer, Vestas is planning a thorough investigaion and Infinis, which operates the turbines, has since suspended operation of the site.

In the meantime, a few in the media have speculated as to what might have have happened (or didn’t happen) within that intricate interconnected patchwork of gears and safety mechanisms. Paul Marks over at New Scientist outlines the various possibilities of what might went wrong:

It’s not yet clear what happened, but attention is likely to focus on the turbine’s ability to shut itself down in high wind. A wind turbine normally shuts down when winds reach 55 mph - but something clearly went awry in Ardrossan, perhaps causing excess current in the generator windings, which may have led to the fire.

The shutdown is normally performed by ‘feathering’ the turbine blades so they do not turn. “In general the turbine blades will pitch out in high winds, keeping the turbines in idle mode,” confirms a spokesman for the turbine’s manufacturer, Vestas of Aarhus, Denmark.

Another source of the problem may be a fault in the turbine’s gearbox, which ensures the rotor speed is adjusted so that the generator provides electricity that matches what is required by the grid it is feeding.

Even before the explosion, the industry already had its hands full convincing the public that the technology is worth pouring money and confidence into. Currently, it supplies about 2 percent of the world’s energy needs. Critics like the Country Guardian have also derided the whole underlying concept as fruitless since, they claim, that the energy from wind isn’t constant enough to be reliable. And of course, there’s that well-known problem of accidental bird fatalities that has some environmentalists reticent about the technology.

It wasn’t too long ago that Billionaire oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens announced plans to build the world’s largest wind farm before eroding financial support caused him bail out on the whole idea. Now the industry would probably need a to deliver a sufficient way to address and fix the problem as the storm of doubt is brewing.

(via New Scientist)

Related on SmartPlanet:

More renewable tech:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tuan C. Nguyen

About Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Contributing Editor, Technology

Tuan C. Nguyen is a freelance science journalist based in New York City. He has written for the U.S. News and World Report, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, AOL, Yahoo! News and LiveScience. Formerly, he was reporter and producer for the technology section of ABCNews.com. He holds degrees from the University of California Los Angeles and the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
This never happens with other power sources...
and think of all the zero people who were injured or killed by this incident! This makes smog and particulates, nuclear radiation, and the removal of entire mountain tops and destruction of waterways from coal mining seem like, well, like very big potatoes, actually. A turbine exploding on a fairly isolated hilltop is only a serious concern when taken completely out of context of the larger energy problems we are facing.
Posted by technology@...
16th Dec
+3 Votes
+ -
Proof of superiority
This incident provides evidence of the damage done in a worse case scenario involving a failure in wind turbines. Not so bad when compared to a natural gas explosion. Natural gas being the closest fossil fuel based and relatively clean alternative to wind. By comparison natural gas explosions have resulted in death, injury and widespread property damage. In my mind this incident only goes to prove the superiority of wind turbines over fossil fuel systems when compared on the basis of safety.
Posted by ddcmall
16th Dec
+3 Votes
+ -
This is the worst that could happen?
Compare that with the outright disasters of Chernobyl and Fukushima, or the financial bath of Three Mile Island and you ought to be coming up with different conclusions than " the industry already had its hands full convincing the public that the technology is worth pouring money and confidence into."

Intermittency isn't nearly the issue that folks thought it would be due to the fact that the electric grid is already capable of dealing with sudden massive changes in electrical load when a much bigger power plant comes up or goes down. Plus the smart grid technologies coming out are specifically engineered for networks of distributed power sources.

I'm surprised the bird fatalities thing is still out there--have we outlawed automobiles yet? They kill many, many more every year, and then there are cats, feral and domesticated combining to leave everyone else in the dust.

And I don't know why T. Boone Pickens didn't go ahead, other than the fact that we are in the midst of a financial climate that makes any major commitment next to impossible, but wind is still cheaper than either new coal or nuclear and does not require anywhere near the same financial pooling to move ahead. There have been over 100 planned coal plant cancellations in the past decade or so, and nukes are still struggling mightily to get off the ground even with huge loan guarantees and subsidies, so it's no wonder than more new energy capacity has been coming from wind than from anywhere else for the past several years.
Posted by klassman6
16th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Incomplete article!
This article mostly makes accusations and fails to elaborate on what actually happened. How many other turbines were in this field that performed properly? What were the service and maintenance records on this particular machine? Was it spinning before the video, or had it feathered out of the wind, and a freak gust whipped the blades into a frenzy?
In Iowa, USA, wind already accounts for 20% of electricity production, with no similar accidents. Wind is growing, it's green, it's creating jobs, and reducing carbon use. Let's not rule it out because of one malfunction, much less not bother to discover the whole story before lambasting the entire industry.
Posted by KenFees
16th Dec
-2 Votes
+ -
Observation.
What would the environmental impact be if that happened over water?

The odds of such FREAK winds are much higher at sea than on shore.
Posted by Hates Idiots
16th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
I'd guess...
None, since the most toxic part of a wind turbine is the glue used in the fibre glass blades.
Posted by shaunehunter
16th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
No ground fire?
Wind turbines are pretty low on the toxic scale.
Posted by riverat1
16th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Gotta love the BS spin
--There is a general trend upward in accident numbers over the past 10 years. This is predicted to escalate unless the Health and Safety Executive makes some significant changes, in particular to protect the public by declaring a minimum safe distance between new turbine developments and occupied housing and buildings (currently 2km in Europe), and declaring no-go areas to the public.--

Lets see.. 10 years ago, the wind-energy field was far smaller. it only makes sense that as, over 10 years, the number of turbines, and the like are built, that there will be more accidents. Gotta love how these nay-sayers try to twist the most obvious, NORMAL stuff into world-ending statistics... Morons
Posted by jonrosen
Updated - 16th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Scaremongering at its best
First off, it didn't explode, it caught fire. Secondly the turbine was not operating, the blades are clearly feathered. The footage shows the turbine twisting on its yaw drive in a manner faster than usual, most likely that its yaw gears are smashed from the extreme winds and it is simply twisting in the breeze. Can we have a look at pictures of the rest of Scotland after this storm? From what I hear the whole country was fairly trashed. It is also worth noting that not one wind turbine failed after the earthquake and subsequent tidal wave in Japan.
Posted by Chuckufarli
16th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Meanwhile
"about a 150,000 homes were suddenly left without power partly because a wide network of the energy-generating sites were forced to shut down temporarily"

Meanwhile, new U.S. govenment regulations will shut down ~60 power plants next year, leaving dozens of small U.S. towns without utility revenue, hundreds of jobs, and power.

Maybe you can build enough windmills with your Free Taxpayer Money to replace all those lost Megawatts...
Posted by bb_apptix
21st Dec
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!