Follow this blog:
RSS

Waking up in America’s most toxic city

By | November 4, 2009, 8:04 AM PST

Many Atlantans are shocked to wake up this morning and find we’re America’s most toxic metro area.

(That’s the view from my porch, taken just a few minutes ago.)

But we are taking it with aplomb. “It’s nice to be number one at something,” said the guy tiling my new bathroom.

Where I live, five miles east of downtown, the idea seems preposterous. Atlanta is a city of trees. I can walk to dozens of restaurants and shops from my house. On weekends the streets are filled with bicycles. There’s a train at the corner that can whisk me straight to the Airport in less than an hour and, from there, to anywhere in the world.

But that’s the thing about the “new toxicity.” It’s hidden.  Forbes says we have 58 Superfund sites, and 277 major polluters, that our air quality ranks with Rhode Island and Milwaukee.

There is a reason for this. Atlanta prides itself on drawing in businesses from outside. The deal only has to look good to the CEO coming in, and only in the short term.

A generation ago that meant attracting auto plants and and cheap electricity from burning coal. Today it means tax breaks for corporate offices. In both cases it means there’s nothing to stop pollution from happening, and no money to clean it up.

Many of our Superfund sites are small, and some have doubtless been cleaned up. Among those listed by health consultant Jonathan Campbell is 1784 North Decatur Road, two miles from my house, which is listed as an “Automotive Research Center.” It’s now a handsome academic building at Emory University (right).

Others are simply abandoned, like 3285 Oakcliff Road NW, near the intersection of I-20 and I-285. Google’s satellite map shows a row of squares where warehouses once were.

The company listed as owning the lot, ABC Compounding, now distributes its cleaning products from a strip mall in Morrow, 10 miles south of the city. Out of sight means out of mind.

Some sites are owned by big outfits, like General Motors, Owens-Illinois, and Delta Airlines. But most are like the two I just mentioned, small, maybe remediated, maybe forgotten.

The bigger problem is how we make our electricity. Coal. It’s not clean. The Scherer power plant, south of the city, is the single biggest source of CO2 in the U.S. Two other plants are in the top 50. There is no pressure to change because electric rates are low. That’s one of the things that attracts businesses.

Then there is the traffic, which is legendary. Outside the city there is almost no mass transit, and urban planning is considered Communist. Houston is better –at least there you have alternate routes. And don’t get me started on parks. Atlanta is sadly lacking in public spaces. That’s why people here hate density.

Atlanta, in sum, is all about growth, not about paying for it. We let our children and grandchildren do that.

It takes more than marketing to make a city smart. It takes planning, it takes a willingness to make hard, even expensive choices. You have to look beneath the surface, acknowledge the reality, and deal with it rationally.

The state of denial is a very dirty place.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Technology

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Waking up in America's most toxic city
The link about "lacking in public spaces" references a parkland purchase for the beltline. The mind-boggling thing about the price of the 221 acres purchased for some $76.9M dollars is that it represent a cost of almost $348,000/acre ! Talk about things being expensive... that's some very high priced parkland. The cost of green around Atlanta is high.
Posted by dan.mcneill@...
5th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Waking up in America's most toxic city
Aww, my poor hometown just can't get a break... You're exaclty right, and one of the reasons I left Atlanta back in 2003 was frustration with the pace (or lack thereof) of progress toward making the city more livable and sustainable - there's simply no political or economic support for anything other than quickly increasing growth, which has lead to the city becoming a monster of cars, smog, and ugly, unplanned, low-density development (emphasis on UGLY).

Hell, that whole belt line park/public-transit thing has been tossed around since I was a baby. It would be hugely beneficial to city life and would make progress toward turning the city in a new direction, but ever since I can remember it's been just 5 or 10 years over the horizon - just need one more land-use study or environmental impact analysis or community input meeting. Sadly, it seems that no one has the courage to raise corporate taxes in fear of driving large companies to other cities, too many folks are afraid of public transit, worrying that it will bring ruffians and criminals into their suburban neighborhoods.

It's just a mess, but I really do miss the food!!!

Sigh...
Posted by clh201
5th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Don't forget the institutionalized corruption
It's difficult to impossible to realize any strategic plan when the
corruption is as institutionalized as it has been here. (Think of the
friends of Roy who happened to own all that property around the
"Northern Arc" or the billion dollars paid to a single bidder to move
dirt for the 5th runway at Hartsfield; The beltline will likely suffer
a similar fate)

When there's so much political corruption, there's absolutely no
incentive to do anything right, and every reason to do what's cheap and
expedient.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
5th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
The West side park purchase
Two things about the West Side park. First, they weren't just buying parkland, but a ready-to-use second reservoir, close to existing treatment facilities, that the city needs badly.

Seocnd, note the date. 2006. Top of the market. It would be great if some of the fortunes that got out in time (like Cousins) would create a fund to buy additional land at current prices to expand the park footprint.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
7th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
CIH201
I don't think corruption is any worse in Georgia than it is anywhere else. It's different.

Most Atlanta corruption is very small time. It's bureaucrats dedicated to keeping their dead end jobs.

The statewide corruption is something else. Georgia has been run by real estate interests for many years. Look at the campaign contributions -- I did a study of this while at Voic.us. It's all homebuilders and developers, first maxing out and then bundling. You can give $5,000 per cycle to a legislative candidate who serves 150,000 constituents, then have your spouse do it, and each of your kids, and a few employees. Comes to a tidy sum.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
7th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
JohnMcGrew
I consider what's going on in Georgia to be politics based on short-term values. It's about now, and next month, and the next year, not about the next decade or next several decades, as it was in the 1960s, during the heyday of Ivan Allen Jr., Robert Woodruff, Ellis Arnall and Jimmy Carter.

This kind of get rich quick mentality is always present when you have fast growth. But now that the growth has been thrown into reverse, people may start thinking differently.

If they can remember how...
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
7th Nov 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Or, perhaps it's the "let someone else worry about it" mentality
In an age where the federal government is expected to fix (and pay)
for all "big" problems, why should we go to the trouble and expense
of addressing these long-term problems ourselves? The water
situation is a perfect example of this fallacy. It's just recently
become apparent about how relying upon the federal government for our
water is such a grave mistake. And yet, you're probably right in
that now that we're 15-inches and counting over average for rainfall
this year and the lake is full, people will start to forget.

But I'm still sticking with the cynicism that institutionalized
corruption has built. It's very difficult to get people to buy-in to
the billions of dollars that need to be spent to mitigate our
problems when we all know that 2/3rds of it will be wasted on the
graft built into the system.

There is hope that this is changing. This year's Atlanta Mayoral
election is notable because it's the first in modern memory when none
of the major candidates had any significant ethical baggage in tow,
or weren't wholly owned by the political machinery.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
10th Nov 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.