Follow this blog:
RSS

Video: Trees that grow into ‘living bridges’

By | September 27, 2011, 6:00 AM PDT

It’s pretty obvious that all of us here at SmartPlanet love hearing about innovative technologies that not only give people a leg up on their lives, but do it in a sustainable way. Ultimately though, we’d be hard pressed to come up with anything greener than the kind of solutions engineered with the help of mother nature herself.

A fine example of this can be found in a forest region of India called Nongriat, where locals have been — get ready for this — growing their own bridges. Yes, literally, as in there even photos and video to prove it.

The living structures, some of which stretch over one hundred feet in length, are sturdy enough to support the weight of more than 50 people. Beyond their utilitarian function, enabling natives to cross distant ridges, the bridges are essentially the roots of a type of rubber tree called ficus elastica. Left unfettered, the roots expand in more unwieldy pattern (hint: they’re definitely not being so accommodating out of their own free will). But at some point roughly 500 years ago, indigenous tribespeople discovered that they could guide the formation of this outgrowth using betel nut trunks as tools. Once the roots reach the opposite bank, they form a stable foundation from which to they continue to grow and strengthen.

Admittedly, the process, known as tree shaping, isn’t nearly as efficient as modern construction methods. Whereas it took three years to construct the world’s longest sea-bridge in China, nurturing a, say, organic version takes about 10 to 15 years. So you’d have to figure that the Khasis, who’ve been in the bridge growing business for more than 500 years, must be some really patient people.

I guess what I really like about their approach is the idea of intervening upon the environment only as much as necessary to fix a problem — no matter how long it takes. No deforestation, hazardous waste or expenditure of fuels.

And interesting enough, the living bridges are actually stronger than ones built from wood. Since the Cherrapunji region gets about fifteen meters of rainfall yearly, their proven durability demonstrates that the structures can better withstand being bombarded by flash floods and other destructive forces.

Faced with such hazards, it’s nice to know that nature on its own can provide that kind of support, aided slightly by technology.

(via i09)

Images: Living root bridges

Related stories:

More low-tech solutions on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tuan C. Nguyen

About Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Contributing Editor

Tuan C. Nguyen is a freelance science journalist based in New York City. He has written for the U.S. News and World Report, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, AOL, Yahoo! News and LiveScience. Formerly, he was reporter and producer for the technology section of ABCNews.com. He holds degrees from the University of California Los Angeles and the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Living bridges
When I was a kid we did something similar with sapplings that could be bent in the way we wanted them to go. Our parents were not happy with our construction projects with their windbreak ( a row of trees to "break" the cold north wind from tender crops, etc ). I think the kids of America were greatly mistreated "green" architects. Too funny.
Posted by IMWeira
27th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
"Efficient"
I guess it depends on your definition of efficient. Usually efficient doesn't mean the same thing as fast. I'd say this bridge construction is FAR more efficient than modern methods, because it takes next to no energy or resource input.
Posted by dkerber@...
27th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
foot traffic
OK...I can see this may work for a couple of dozen people using it per week, but imagine what would happen to this hapless tree if several thousand people used it per day! Uh-uh...no way will this tree survive...a nice solution for deep in the jungle, but in a more populated area, wouldn't work...And besides...years of work and training could be destroyed by one Indiana Jones with a machete!
Posted by tech_ed@...
27th Sep 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!