Follow this blog:
RSS

The real value in anti-WiFi paint

By | October 6, 2009, 3:21 AM PDT

Forget the snarky comments about “secure your WiFi with paint.”

(Picture from CNET’s Crave blog.)

The development of an aluminum oxide paint that resonates at high frequencies by researchers at the University of Tokyo has good, solid practical uses.

This paint lets us mold wireless networks so they work where we want them to, and don’t work where they might create interference.

The obvious first beneficiaries are going to be hospitals.

Hospitals have been building-out sophisticated WiFi networks for a decade now. They handle voice as well as data traffic. Many sophisticated medical devices run on WiFi frequencies, or bands near them.

Now these high bandwidth applications can be protected. Just paint the outside of the radiology department with this new paint, at just $16 per kilogram, and the problem is solved. Those devices are now isolated from the rest of the building and have access to the whole frequency band.

That last is as important as the security angle. Isolating WiFi networks gives each network access to the whole frequency band, with minimal sharing. Integrating wired and wireless networking with this new paint means more throughput where you need it.

You can still have WiFi wherever you want it. Just add a wire with a wireless router. Secure that router’s IP number and you can track whatever is happening on that bandwidth.

This means you can have consumer WiFi in the waiting rooms, while doctors can be using the same frequencies in other locations without fear of violating privacy.

Many businesses have long faced the choice between enabling delicate communications within the executive suite and keeping their business secure. Paint the outside of the suite, make it an island, and you can run the data. Instead of having a sea of WiFi, have a set of lakes and ponds you can control. Plus each pond gets access to the full frequency band.

Molding a network to a corporate campus, a university campus, or a hospital campus has been impossible until now. Now it’s possible.

You’re not really paying for the bits on your WiFi connection, and a logical separation between your own network and that connection should let you share it. You’re certain to be held harmless if, without your knowledge, some hoser does something untoward with bandwidth on your router — were that not the case coffee shops could not exist.

But molding a wireless network to the physical contours of the location where it’s designed to run — that’s cool.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
This could be a God-send
It seems today that people seem to feel that cell phone/texting/emailing is a God-given right to be exercised whenever and wherever they want.

You are in a movie, and people are talking and texting on cells. In church cells phones are in use. I sing in the choir, and not too long ago a cell phone rang, and we could hear, "I can't talk now because I'm in church". You go to a public meeting, and people are constantly using their cells/Blackberry. You are in the library, and people are talking on their cells. You are on the train, and the guy next to you is yelling into his cell so he can be heard, driving you nuts. The person at the next table in a nice restaurant is having an argument with someone on his cell phone. THIS IS A REAL PROBLEM.

I went to a large public meeting recently where the speaker told people to turn off their cell phones. He told them FOUR times in a row. 10 minutes later a cell phone rang, and he had the person escorted forcefully from the meeting, and some of the others were outraged that the speaker was not nicer!

We need cell-phone free zones.
Posted by dwsimpso
6th Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The real value in anti-WiFi paint
I think baking foil under wallpaper would do just as good a job.
My house had scaffolding around it for a while. It held the WiFi signal
in; giving a better signal around the house and blocked signals out.



Posted by Mike106132000@...
6th Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
There is aluminum here
It's in the form of aluminum oxide. This particular formulation resonates with higher frequencies than the tin foil hat you put on your house. (Sorry for the snark -- couldn't resist. Didn't mean anything by it. I'm just overcome by rim shot itis sometimes...)
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
6th Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The real value in anti-WiFi paint
The newscientist.com article linked at the top of this story says existing paints shield up to 48GHz already. That should work fine for free WiFi (2.4GHz ISM and 5GHz UNII bands), and even most cell phone traffic (900MHz to 3GHz). Why isn't THAT readily available to help mitigate overcrowding of the 3 non-overlapping channels in the 2.4GHz band?
Posted by Darr247
6th Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The real value in anti-WiFi paint
Uhm, would this work on a car to block reflectance of radar
waves?

IIRC, someone already thought of that, and the Pentagon shut
him down.

You'd use this paint on top of the primer coat, and maybe
sprinkle in some nano-scale antennas grown on tiny crystals.

They'd absorb the radar and re-emit it on lower frequencies.

Thus, no radar bounceback.
Posted by Jkirk3279
6th Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Umm, is the paint optically clear?
I'm sure this paint would help, but Most people like having a window to the outside world. Interior industrial doors often use glass panels to make sure the path is clear before opening a door. And GHz frequency RF passes fairly easily through untreated glass.

This stuff would certainly help, but so long as I can look up from my desk and see the cell tower down the road... Or look through the glass in the door and see the hospital's antennas down the corridor...
Posted by Jim Johnson
6th Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Windows!
This would only work on rooms, houses, workplaces without
windows.
Therefore practically no use at all.
Unless we all want to live in bunkers.
Posted by pjher
8th Oct 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!