Follow this blog:
RSS

The Babbage machine returns, smaller but more important

By | March 25, 2010, 8:50 AM PDT

Ironic, but just a few weeks before Ada Lovelace Day, celebrating the woman who programmed Charles Babbage’s unbuilt Difference Engine, we found that Babbage’s design principles may have real 21st century importance.

(This is a close-up of an illustration that appeared in an abstract at Nano Letters, showing a logic gate based on Babbage’s design principles.)

The lab of Pritoraj “Raj” Mohanty at Boston University has used the principle structure of the Babbage Difference Engine — a mechanical logic gate — and built a nanoscale version of it that uses less energy than traditional chip gates.

This is not just important in a green way. Energy loss is a big problem for chip-makers.

Energy is lost in the form of heat and heat can build up. That’s why computers have fans, to dissipate that heat. Otherwise, as in the ill-fated Intel Pentium IV, the chip can over-heat and burn out. These heat problems eventually caused chip makers to move toward low-power chip designs in the last decade.

In the original Difference Engine design, gears set numbers mechanically when a handle was turned. A later version was actually built, and helped solve logarithmic problems. But the revolution in calculation Babbage predicted never happened, due to the costs of manufacturing the machines.

The new nano-Babbage machine uses electricity, of course, but the principle of storing and moving whole numbers remains.

As described in the journal Nano Letters, Mohanty’s gate uses electricity to set a silicon strip vibrating, and that vibration can be reliably switched to different amplitudes, settings software can program.

The gate is not as fast as a traditional gate, but since it uses less energy, it creates less electrical interference with other components, meaning it can be made smaller and more reliable.

Mohanty’s success also illustrates an important principle in science. Don’t confuse it with engineering.

What can be conceived can’t always be built right away, but the principle remains important. Discarding science that can’t be engineered right away is a mistake, and the past is always teaching us lessons.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
The discussion hasn’t started yet. Why don’t you begin it?
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!