By Tuan Nguyen
Posting in Government
A recent news report revealed that local police made the first ever arrest of U.S. citizens with the assistance of drones.
While the technology has been heralded as a gamechanger in the U.S. military's war on terror, it's also proven to be just as much a liability. For instance, Predator and surveillance drones have enabled commanders to take out key operatives such as second ranking Al-Qaeda member Atiyah Abd al-Rahman. They've also been hacked, decried for assassinating a terrorist suspect who happened to be a U.S. Citizen and have fallen in the wrong hands, as is the case with the ongoing hostile sitution in Iran. Now, the use of Unmanned aerial vehicles have just opened a whole new can of controversy.
A recent news report revealed that, back on June 24th, local police in North Dakota made the first ever arrest of U.S. citizens with the assistance of unarmed predator drones. And oddly enough, the incident didn't involve terrorism or narcotics, but rather a search for missing cows on a remote stretch of farmland.
Here's a brief synposis of what transpired on a late summer evening as reported by Stars and Stripes, a military news publication. Sheriff Kelly Janke of the Nelson County Police Department had entered the 3,000 acre Brossart family farm looking for six cows that were reported missing when three men with brandishing riffles men chased him off the property. Upon retreating to safety, he immediately called for backup, which included a SWAT team, a bomb squad and a Predator B drone.
The next morning the drone scoped out activity from overhead and found that the three men had left the farm in an all-terrain vehicle and were unarmed, enabling police officers to swarm the suspects without the risk of a deadly confrontation.
But what so happens to be an effective way to head off a potentially dangerous situation, can also be viewed as a blatant violation of personal privacy, especially in light of the fact that the the drones have already aided law enforcement on at least a few occasions.
"We don't use (drones) on every call out," Bill Macki, head of the police SWAT team in Grand Forks told Stars and Stripes. "If we have something in town like an apartment complex, we don't call them."
In 2005, surveillance drones were initially sanctioned for use by the Customs and Border Protection agency to crack down on illegal immigration and drug smuggling. But what has been somewhat somewhat overlooked was a provision that allowed for the deployment the fleet of eight unmanned aircraft for “interior law enforcement support,” which apparently includes cases of livestock theft.
Since then, local police have called upon the drones for all kinds of surveillance, which at least one member of congress thinks is a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, a law that bars the military from taking a police role on U.S. soil.
According to Stars and Stripes:
Former Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., who sat on the House homeland security intelligence subcommittee at the time and served as its chairwoman from 2007 until early this year, said no one ever discussed using Predators to help local police serve warrants or do other basic work.
Using Predators for routine law enforcement without public debate or clear legal authority is a mistake, Harman said. "There is no question that this could become something that people will regret," said Harman, who resigned from the House in February and now heads the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, a Washington think tank.
Historically, the courts have ruled that the use of surveillance technology, including from aerial vehicles, was legal since any behavior outside the walls of a a person's home was essentially being done out in the open. And proponents argue that the drones are better than planes since they fly out of sight and can monitor a location for 20 hours straight. In this situation, officers even obtained a search warrant to probe the property. But ultimately, whenever you have a case of government ordinances butting heads, the courts will likely have to revisit the matter.
And in case you're wondering, a sweep of the Brossart property uncovered "four rifles, two shotguns, assorted bows and arrows and a samurai sword" along with the missing cows.
(via Stars and Stripes)
- Virus attacks military drones, exposes vulnerabilities
- How satellite technology may have tracked down Bin Laden
- Video: Piloted aircraft transforms into a spy drone
- Is China’s helicopter drone a spy bot?
- Jetpacks: Origins of a spy aircraft
The latest military weapons:
- Stealth cruise missile blasts through navy ship [video]
- Russia’s new stealth fighter to challenge for supremacy of the skies [video]
- Video: Is navy’s hypersonic railgun a game-changer?
- Video: U.S. soldiers to get ‘punisher’ super rifle
- ‘Laser rifle’ is latest U.S. weapon against enemies
- Breakthrough may lead to super-destructive missiles
Dec 12, 2011
These are some very high priced toys. When it is a question of surveillance of high crime areas, stationary cameras are much cheaper and do not require as many training dollars for operators. The more complicated a thing is and the more moving parts it has the higher the maintenance costs, there are not many trained or certified in the repair of such specialized equipment. There has been some problems with these things being hacked. Hacking them is a good way to vandalize them, to steal them for resale, or for someone to repurpose them into spying on the agency that owns them, or even to use them for attacks placing blame on the registered owner. The second hand market opens opportunity for abuses. Not every component is made in the US which is the same as shipping tech jobs overseas.
Care to guess how fast you would be arrested if you made your own and used it for policing the police or corporate America ? . I can't wait for the arrests to start when the small drones start nosing about your windows and doors or if people start saying no and start hacking or shooting them down , and how much is this costing us ? we're broke ! .
When small UAV's first hit the military decades ago there was an east coast state working with the military doing traffic surveillance of I95 as hands on training for the UAV pilots. Onsite cruisers were directed to speeding vehicles, speeding tickets were issued and a few arrests were made when out standing warrants were found.