Follow this blog:
RSS

Oilmageddon will be industry’s Chernobyl

By | May 24, 2010, 10:02 AM PDT

When the history of our time is written the BP oil spill will have done more to harden American attitudes against the oil industry than any other event.

All the Earth Day marches in the world, even Al Gore’s most powerful PowerPoint, can’t match the photo above, a still shot from BP’s own “spillcam” taken May 22.

The Chernobyl disaster killed the nuclear industry for a generation. What might be the impact of what we are seeing in the Gulf right now?

When the leak started a month ago, I was like most Americans. I assumed it would be stopped fairly quickly. I figure some successor to Red Adair would ride to the rescue on a big boat and cap that gusher. That’s money flowing out of the seabed, after all.

But as days turned into weeks it became apparent BP does not know what it’s doing, and no one else does, either. Politicians who once routinely did Big Oil’s bidding are now backpedaling and the Obama Administration is racing to get ahead of what may well be a seismic shift in public attitudes.

A poll taken two weeks ago showed no change in these attitudes, but since then the oil has just continued to flow.

BP’s own “spillcam” has become the “money shot” of this disaster — anyone who lives near the Gulf of Mexico and can watch that for five minutes without crying has no heart. BP’s spin that they can clean this up is no longer credible.

I covered the oilpatch a bit on my first job in journalism, at the Houston Business Journal. I know how powerful the industry is. No industry of the 20th century has attained such power.

I also know that politicians of both parties are reluctant to challenge big business, especially in the wake of the Citizens United decision, which let companies put pre-tax dollars to work influencing elections for the first time.

My experience in Houston taught me other things. It taught me just how pernicious this damage will be. The Exxon Valdez spill is still damaging Alaska. This is 10 times worse.

And even if there were a miracle and this well were capped today, things would be getting worse. Hurricane season is coming. Forecasters have no idea what might happen. The whole East Coast could be inundated with oil.

This disaster won’t spin. The effects of this spill will last, for the rest of my life, and probably for yours as well.

So here’s something for your comments. Are you finally ready, now at long last, to take away this industry’s “tax incentives” and give them to greener industries?

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Oilmageddon will be industry's Chernobyl
The reaction to the Chernobyl disaster, ironically, led to greater dependence on oil & coal as energy sources. We've fought 2 wars with Iraq because of oil. Iran believes, so far justifiably, that it can do whatever it wants because of the necessity of oil. The GOP will try to blame the Obama administration for the current disaster. Big oil will have a massive PR campaign to convince us that it will not happen again.
Posted by hoodedswan
25th May 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Oilmageddon will be industry's Chernobyl
This may have a wider impact than anyone is willing to say. There is the gulf stream current, that flows from the gulf, into the atlantic, and north to the arctic. this brings warm temperatures to north europe. What will happen ecologically, economically and politically if damaging levels of oil make it that far? The north atlantic fishing grounds, used by the us, canada, and most of europe could be impacted, dark oil+icecap = oily water, etc.
Posted by kevinrs1
25th May 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Oilmageddon will be industry's Chernobyl
Until just a few days ago, BP was advertising on MSNBC, even as Keith Olbermann was blasting them for their incompetence and cavalier attitude with safety.

It's a strange political, environmental, and economic climate we live in today. Everyone's stressed, and when people are stressed, the ability to make tough, detail-oriented decisions seems to be in sharp decline. Consequently, I have a feeling that this is not going to end well, for either the people of the Gulf Coast, the oil companies, the politicians who assumed the oil companies knew what they were doing, the regulators who looked the other way or couldn't be bothered to actually regulate, in fact, for the whole US population. And let's not even consider what it's going to do to the environment...

We've known for almost forty years that we needed to get off the petroleum standard. We've had government programs, tax credits, demonstration projects, and all kinds of other things that were supposed to move us into a more sustainable future. But like so many other gigantic challenges this country's faced since WWII, we've dropped the ball so many times. Just like with Social Security. Just like with health care reform (the joke bill that was passed doesn't deserve the name). Just like with political reform. Just like with education. We've dropped the ball, and no one is fit to pick it up and actually face these challenges and get something done, in the manner that the "Greatest Generation" did when we faced the Axis in the mid-twentieth century. I hate to believe that we're inadequate to the tasks ahead, but that's all I see, on both the Democratic and Republican sides, and even more so with political pranksters like the Tea Party know-nothings.

I would love to be proven wrong. I'm waiting...
Posted by Den2010
25th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Oilmageddon will be industry's Chernobyl
I live in North Carolina and the thought of the oil coming ashore is staggering. I don't want to imagine what this could mean for all the coastal towns along the shores of Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina. We think the economy is devastated now? Hang on for hurricane season. May God have mercy on our coastline.
Posted by fshwear
25th May 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
Over reaching
The blown out, deep water oil well shows that technically we are able to drill in such deep water but we do not have enough tools to deal with problems caused by accidents, mistakes or bad judgement. The fail safes did not work; whether it is because of the extreme pressures or because people cut corners to save money remains to be seen.

This accident shows that the consequences to other industries from tourism to fishing that are being negatively impacted by this mess. Chernobyl did not kill the nuclear industry, there are still plans to build more reactors. Chernoble showed one of the worst case disasters and the lack of planning to deal with disasters. Oilmageddon will show that we need to address the risks much better than has been done.

I am impressed that companies can find and drill oil wells so deep under water. I am impressed at the steps taken to contain the spill and disappointed that those steps have failed. The oil industry needs to have better measures to handle these kinds of problems before drilling more deep water wells. It would be better to stop drilling and suffer a world wide crash of civilization than to create an event that causes another mass extinction that includes humanity. Hopefully, this will not come to that.
Posted by sboverie
25th May 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Oilmageddon will be industry's Chernobyl
Funny how when I was in the US Navy in the nid 80s we had maned and unmaned mini subs that could hit that depth. and since BP OIL did give Obama a lot of money for his campaign why will he not let them use the resources of the us government to help.. Oh wait the worst this becomes the better for his wishes on so called green tech bills to be pasted.
Posted by rparker009
25th May 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
We were hiking in Placerita Canyon a few years ago...
... and, way up in the hills, on the hiking path, overlooking the canyon, we ran into a crude-oil eruption. I was just a little spring, but right in the middle of the path, and it was a constant stream of crude oil bubbling up through the ground, a la Jed Clampett.

It stank just like a road being paved, and for a long way. Mind you, this wasn't 5 miles from the 3 *additional* wells they had recently drilled on the other side of highway 14, that were running at full tilt. And, still, the system had enough oil under enough pressure that the stuff was literally bursting out of the ground, up in the hills.

We'd better get busy pumping and using this stuff on our own terms, or we're going to have a lot worse to worry about than what's going on in the gulf.

And, on another note, the residents all around Placerita have lived within hundreds of yards of that environment for decades. And, yet, no apparent cancer clusters have emerged. This makes the Hollywood High (which is also a mere stone's throw from the la Brea tar pits) cancer scare seem more likely due to diet and genetics than to the oil well in their yard.
Posted by Gaius_Maximus
25th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Closing the well
What I don't understand is why could they not have put an explosive device, possibly something like a "shaped charge" that would close off and cave in the wellhead. After all, they have been saying all along that it was their intention (BP's) to cap this "exploratory well" and return to it at a later time.
Posted by JTF243@...
25th May 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Oilmageddon will be industry's Chernobyl
What we're seeing in the Gulf is nothing more than what we've already seen in the banking and securities markets. It's unbridled greed, folks. Get a clue.

If there is no punishment for unbridled greed, then this is the result to expect. BP has never shown anything to anybody except its lust for greed. Let the bastards pay for the crop that they harvested with their lust for greed. Keep on drilling, and keep on fighting against cleaner alternatives. You know how to do it, don't you? Foul your home. You love filth anyhow, don't you?
Posted by ITOdeed
25th May 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
Oh lord who thought THAT name up?
Lolmageddon more like.

If it werent so serious, I'd laugh at the excuses that 'safeguards were in place, and failed.' and 'its too deep for conventional procedures to deal with'. However, it is serious, and only so because those safeguards were inadequate. BP are so greedy they thought they could get away with doing something as stupid as poking holes in the sea-bed out of reach of any true safeguards in the event of failure.

Its not the first time this has happened, just the first time its happened at the well-head and so deep. It was always going to happen somewhere, sometime.

BP and its ilk have no intention of spending the money this will take to clean up, because they know to do so would mean cleaning up their entire act. They know they likely wouldnt turn a profit for years to come.

Big Oil are so shortsighted, if they had any sense they'd quit drilling for energy and start selling us seawater. Last year we'd have called them con-artists for that, but this year the climate is ripe.

Come on guys, if you really want to rip us off selling stuff that you get for free, why not water instead of oil?
You have the money and the resources to remodel your business, and you are the literal source, the spring that issues the tide of filth thats ruining our planet.
I'm not just talking about that leak, tiny in comparison to the damage already done, I'm talking about the industry itself...

Us fleas better be careful how deep we bite, or we're in danger of being scratched off the hog...
Posted by SiO2
26th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Oilmageddon will be industry's Chernobyl
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited under the First Amendment.

Your article states ?I also know that politicians of both parties are reluctant to challenge big business, especially in the wake of the Citizens United decision, which let companies put pre-tax dollars to work influencing elections for the first time.?

Must I remind you that equal protection under the law is a fundamental concept?
The news, print and broadcasters are also corporations.

Let?s review what E.W. Scripps had to say about the press: ?A newspaper must at all times antagonize the selfish interests of that very class which furnishes the larger part of a newspaper's income... The press in this country is dominated by the wealthy few...that it cannot be depended upon to give the great mass of the people that correct information concerning political, economical and social subjects which it is necessary that the mass of people Shall have in order that they vote...in the best way to protect themselves from the brutal force and chicanery of the ruling and employing classes.?

But your article would lead us to believe groups of like minded citizens should not be allowed to form a non-profit corporation, combine their money and coordinate efforts to get a grass roots message before the public.

You do realize we the people could form such a non-profit to chastise British Petroleum and demand action from the House and Senate?

As for finding new energy sources:

America has 1/4th the coal on planet Earth and 100 years worth of natural gas. If citizens demand it, these resources could be used to establish United States energy independence in a matter of a few years. Declaring our energy independence would help reverse the US trade imbalance, keep capital in this country for job creation and deny funds to Middle East terrorists.

Existing fleets of automobiles can readily be retrofitted to run on natural gas and would be more practical than subsidizing electric cars that have limited range and long recharge cycles.
Posted by Repeal
26th May 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Oilmageddon will be industry's Chernobyl
Realistically, there is no stopping this environmental disaster. The
only thing that we can do is stay calm and plan our children's
survival....if this is even possible. It is what it is now!
Posted by debbie gamble
12th Jun 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!