Follow this blog:
RSS

Obama Administration privatizing the Health Internet

By | April 12, 2010, 10:19 AM PDT

The Bush Administration’s greatest triumph in health IT was the National Health Information Network (NHIN).

(Art by Roland Heath of Decatur, GA. Reprinted with permission.)

NHIN-Connect was created under a contract with Harris Corp. The man behind the plan, Jim Traficant, turned out to be an inspiring personal story. A survivor of two liver transplants and septic shock, he built a secure method for transferring health records to keep what happened to him from happening to you.

But a government-owned private network is expensive.  So while the military may still use NHIN-Connect to fulfill its pledge of a single health record system from induction through a veteran’s heroic burial, the Administration is doing a work-around for the private sector.

It’s called NHIN Direct. The idea is to turn the NHIN into a set of standards, and a policy framework, enabling hospitals and other service providers to fulfill the promise of the technology on their own.

It’s not a Health Internet. But it’s not a private network, either. It’s a way to use the existing Internet to transmit sensitive patient data securely.

As the Department of Health and Human Services’ Web page on NHIN explains, it’s government laying down the rules and private innovators being given permission to build around them.

Much as in the creation of the Internet you’re now using, Tim O’Reilly writes, the government will set the rules and police them, while the private market will implement the rules and innovate on top of them.

Common protocols and file formats are desperately needed in this area. Some states already have a number of Health Information Exchanges (HIEs), operating on different standards, which make them incompatible. If your hospital is in HIE A but your doctor is in HIE C, in other words, they can’t pass records because they don’t speak the same technical language.

NHIN-Direct won’t solve those problems overnight, but it will provide a framework under which private companies can solve them over time.

This is not without controversy. Some states, and vendors working with those states, will find the NHIN standards make their private networks less profitable, and may argue the NHIN-Direct standards don’t provide the breadth of services they were planning.

The answer is for them to innovate on top of the standards, as on the real Internet. Today’s Web has little in common with what the government was running 20 years ago, but it is based on the same standards.

The Health Internet, like the real Internet, will be in private hands, but will be regulated by the government through standards.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Technology

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
In other words...
it will be an all-for-profit, regulated by the industry itself, meaningless catchphrase, with whoever is the next Comcast deciding if YOUR health provider should be able to recruit clients or network with other doctors, unless they pay their standard kickback.
Posted by mykmlr@...
12th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Depends on what you think of the present Internet
There's no doubt that prices would be extremely high under NHIN-
Connect, because that is a sole source provider.

It's not necessarily true in the present case. Remember that most
hospitals have large enough bandwidth requirements already that they
don't just buy local access from Comcast or AT&T. In the case of an
Atlanta hospital we're talking T-3 connections to a NAP.

In the case of a small clinic or other provider, yes, we're presently
talking about business retail customers.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
12th Apr 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.