Follow this blog:
RSS

NASA issues call for more private spacecraft; Branson wants in

By | October 25, 2010, 4:00 PM PDT

Today, NASA announced a continuation of its Commercial Crew Development program, the $50m private space flight stimulus handed out last year to the likes of Boeing and SpaceDev. The agency is soliciting concepts for new technology, and may award up to $200m before the program is over. First in line is an unexpected suitor: One Sir Richard Branson, whose eyes seem to be wandering from nascent space tourism industry, over to potentially lucrative NASA contracts.

Branson told Reuters, “There’s about four companies that are seriously looking at it (the NASA commercial crew program,” and that his company was in communication with at least two to discuss potential partnership on what Branson described as “orbital space vehicles.” Whether Virgin Galactic ends up in a partnership or not, Branson definitely seems interested.

And rightly so. His interest may come as a surprise to some, but the stars were aligned for it. The most recent NASA appropriations bill called for a radical re-prioritization in the agency, effectively shutting down its next-generation manned spaceflight initiative, the Constellation program. In lieu of an in-house program, NASA will be depending heavily on private contractors to design and construct the crafts necessary to keep the ISS operational, and to keep research on manned spaceflight moving forward in a general sense. There are hints of this ideological shift in the official CCD2 announcement:

As a continuation of NASA’s Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) initiatives begun in 2009 to stimulate efforts within the private sector to develop and demonstrate human spaceflight capabilities, NASA intends to extend efforts to foster activity leading to the development of commercial crew transportation systems. Through this activity, NASA may be able to spur economic growth as capabilities for new space markets are created and reduce the gap in U.S. human spaceflight capability.

Virgin Galactic has shown early successes with the recent high-altitude release of its VSS Enterprise, but is still at least a year away from making good on its promise of sending wealthy tourists into suborbital space, and many years away from going further–it’s particularly hard to see how their current technology is comparable to the orbital craft NASA reportedly wants.

Nonetheless, bagging some funding from NASA would expedite Virgin’s development of something, and in the event that their plans are successful, result in a hefty contract and years of reliable work. (A contract, or even the promise of a contract, is particularly attractive to a company with no apparent source revenue at the moment.)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

John Herrman

About John Herrman

John Herrman was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

John Herrman

John Herrman

Contributing Editor

John Herrman is a freelance writer based in New York City. He is also contributing editor at Gizmodo. He holds a degree from the University of Edinburgh.

Follow him on Twitter.

John Herrman

John Herrman

John has nothing to disclose.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Gee, kind of surprising to see this on SmartPlanet....
...considering that just yesterday, private spacecraft were label as
the next great threat step in our carbon footprint:
http://www.smartplanet.com/business/blog/intelligent-energy/the-
carbon-footprint-of-space-tourism/3297/#comments
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
26th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: NASA issues call for more private spacecraft; Branson wants in
SpaceX is the company to watch. They are
way ahead of the game on private technology
to deliver and retrieve from low earth orbit.
Posted by nfiertel
26th Oct 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!