Follow this blog:
RSS

Mysterious ‘Nazca Lines’ ruins discovered in Saudi desert

By | September 23, 2011, 6:09 AM PDT

Newly released photographs have provided the public with a rare glimpse into a mysterious site that archeologists consider Saudi Arabia’s version of the famous Nazca lines.

These impressive man-made designs, known as geoglyphs, were first discovered in 1927 but have since been shrouded in secrecy because many nations in the middle east prohibit researchers from excavating or even taking aerial photography. Fortunately, archaeologists now have their own not-so-secret tool to get around this problem called Google Earth.

David Kennedy, an archaeologist, used satellite-assisted software to capture detailed views of the giant stone structures, which date back at least 2000 years. The most common ones are circular with various spoke-like patterns that appear to resemble wheels and tend to be concentrated on lava fields. Their dimensions range from 82 feet to 230 feet across.

These latest findings are yet another example of how the combination of satellite technology and ultra high-resolution cameras have revolutionized the field of archaeology. Back in May, a team of archaeologists commissioned NASA satellites to survey Egypt and discovered more than 1,000 tombs and 3,000 ancient settlements. [READ: How NASA satellites unearthed Egypt’s lost pyramids]

And previously, Kennedy had used the program to probe nearly 2000 potential archaeological sites in the region, many of which were “pendants” or ancient stone tombs shaped like teardrops. All his research was done from his office chair using Google Earth’s satellite images.

Still, investigating relics from afar has its limitations. So far, none of the wheels appears to have been excavated, which makes dating them — and uncovering their purpose — a perpetually difficult task. For instance, some archaeologists have speculated that the ruins were likely once houses or cemeteries. Kennedy, however, disagrees.

Meanwhile, Amelia Sparavigna, a physics professor at Politecnico di Torino in Italy, has proposed what feels like a more obvious explanation.

“If we consider, more generally, the stone circles as worship places of ancestors, or places for rituals connected with astronomical events or with seasons, they could have the same function of [the] geoglyphs of South America, the Nazca Lines for instance. The design is different, but the function could be the same,” she told LiveScience.

While the original purpose of these remnants continue to baffle the masses, one thing we do know is that a “search” company, fittingly, has brought us ever closer to solving some of history’s greatest enigmas.

(via CBS News/LiveScience)

In case you missed it:

More great mysteries on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tuan C. Nguyen

About Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Contributing Editor

Tuan C. Nguyen is a freelance science journalist based in New York City. He has written for the U.S. News and World Report, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, AOL, Yahoo! News and LiveScience. Formerly, he was reporter and producer for the technology section of ABCNews.com. He holds degrees from the University of California Los Angeles and the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Animal pins, sand dams, or just natual features?
You can see these types of enclosures almost always along the margins of sand dune systems not only in Saudi Arabia, but in Iraq, and probably most of the other desert countries in the region. Just follow the dune margins. The seem to avg. 20-30 M in diameter, but are much less consistent, dramatic and simpler than the ones shown in the article - 31*04'52.59"N 38*48'57.70E and 31*05'04.69"N 38*48'25.69"E and many other areas (elevations around 2500 ft.

Given their consistent proximity to dune systems you might consider them as man made sand dams - though a sustainable population density in the area necessary to support these numerous structures seems implausible sustainability wise - unless they predate the desertification of the area - but then why are they seemingly only on the sand dune margins?

Looking at the vast numbers of these structures, their general lack of any consistent and purposeful form (man usually very quickly sorts out the best from that follows the the desirable function and then copies it repeatedly), they seem to be natural devices - geological or biological associated somehow with sand dunes more than man made structures.

I also did a small sample GE elevation survey of a number of these structures and it appears that each structure is a few feet lower than the surrounding area. This might imply they are some kind of water/rain catch basin related to the dunes and are being colonized by plants, but not be over grown in the middles where the evaporative alkali content would prevent plant growth.

Given their free-form nature, their lack of communicative resemblance to any cultural elements, they don't bear even the most remote similarity with the Nazca Lines. I would vote for natural processes more than man made.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
Updated - 23rd Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Did you take the time to look at the pictures?
Natural processes? How does nature draw a circle with a human-like figure in the center? Or a circle with intersecting lines and dots between them? I want what you're smoking!
Posted by megatec45
23rd Sep 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Finally the voice of reason
If people would JUST LOOK CLOSELY at the images, they'd see the subliminal images...there are several. I believe this is a hoax (probably photoshop or similar tools used). Come on people. We live in the age where THE CAMERA LIES. Pictures don't prove ANYTHING anymore. Hell SOMEONE OR SOMETHING (bot) is tampering with my own pictures taken by my own camera...I've actually seen it happening in real time on my damn cell phone....photos CHANGING WHILE I'M LOOKING AT THEM. Anything that can be networked is OPEN TO TAMPERING. But then there are people who will say I'm nuts and I DON'T CARE (I'm NOT a Honey Badger, but I DON'T CARE).
Posted by drshanester
10th Sep
+1 Vote
+ -
Nazca Lines
How often does Google Earth update its photos?
Posted by oldrubbie
23rd Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Different rates
The image dates are usually listed on the bottom left of the GE screen and vary area to area - probably dependent on the demand for their updating - which has to be paid for.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
24th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Yet another example
The fact that the religious fanatics in Saudi Arabia will never allow direct scientific investigation of this site is yet another example of religion standing in the way of scientific discovery.
Posted by omb00900@...
24th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
ev Dekorasyon
The fact that the religious fanatics in Saudi Arabia will never allow direct scientific investigation of this site is yet another example of religion standing in the way of scientific discovery.
ev dekorasyon
Posted by akinyapi
24th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Sounds like another Bimini road.
Found in the 1960s, the dabate rages on. Man made or natural?
Posted by Hates Idiots
26th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
English usage
"Fortunately, archaeologists now have their own not-so-secret tool to get around this problem called Google Earth"

I don't know of any problem called Google Earth!
Posted by gmarc01
26th Oct 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Cell Division
It looks like a primer on how cells divide. Maybe someone was posting what type of life lives on this planet...
Posted by james_lucier
10th Apr 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!