Follow this blog:
RSS

Move over big oil: auto makers charged up by utilities

By | March 4, 2010, 9:17 AM PST

Auto makers have long been in lock step with the oil industry for a very obvious reason: making more cars expands the market for big oil. It’s hard to think of a longer or more lucrative symbiosis.

Move over oil refiners. Here comes the electric utilities.

Well, not exactly. Auto makers are still  designing new gasoline and diesel engines albeit more efficient ones. The auto-oil industry love affair is in no immediate danger of a break-up.

credit: Impactlab.com

Who'll make the charging station? credit: Impactlab.com

But lately, auto makers’ roving eye has turned to electric utilities: indeed, watts are challenging octane as the transportation fuel of the future. But what have these loudly-trumpeted demonstration projects actually accomplished?

A few years ago, there were plenty of deals between auto makers and oil and industrial gases companies to demonstrate the infrastructure for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Most petered out and you don’t see anyone driving around in hydrogen powered vehicles.

Some claim the progress between auto makers and utilities has been slow.

“What steps follow a big partnership announcement, after a utility, a vendor or an automaker says it’s done a deal to ready the power grid for an EV rollout?” blogger Josie Garthwaite asks in a Earth2tech.com post entitled “Electric Car Infrastructure Trials: Some Progress, Long Road Ahead.”

Her sagacious post describes how fluid these budding relationships are. For example, it’s not entirely clear if utilities or third parties will make the fast charging stations (keep in mind, oil companies don’t make gas pumps). A good place to read up on fast charging station projects is the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).

Speaking of pace, I suspect the industry that moves electrons moves at a slower pace than the industry that moves people (the use of “moves” three times in that sentence is deliberate). Then again, big loves big and the auto industry’s future depends on the establishment of a safe, effective, convenient and economical charging infrastructure.

There’s no doubt utilities have a big role to play in that and there’s no turning back from electric vehicles. Announcements like Ford’s Tuesday that it will be producing five hybrids or full electrics in Europe by 2013 are coming fast and furiously. If an auto maker does not have some type of relationship with a utility, I’d be surprised. Here are a few:

– On Feb. 3, Ford struck a deal in with Progress Energy and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) to conduct a demonstration project in the Carolinas showcasing a Ford Escape plug-in hybrid.

General Motors in January said that it plans to work with DTE Energy in Detroit “to introduce customers to electric vehicles and establish vehicle charging programs.”

– A year ago, the Nissan-Renault Alliance said it would partner with San Diego Gas & Electric to create an electric vehicle charging network. The Nissan-Renault Alliance is an 11-year-old partnership under which the two companies share technology and research and development.

I’d like to say “move over big oil” and maybe in a year or two, I’ll will.

Follow me on Twitter.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

John Dodge

About John Dodge

John Dodge was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

John Dodge

John Dodge

Contributing Editor, Technology

John Dodge has written for the Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, PC Week (now eWeek), EDN, Design News, Electronic Business, Bio-IT World, Health-IT World, Lowell Sun, Haverhill Gazette and Newburyport Daily News. He is based in Massachusetts.

Follow him on Twitter.

John Dodge

John Dodge

John Dodge prides himself on completely independent journalism. His opinions, observations and reporting are not influenced by any financial holdings. He holds no shares in computer, electronics, software or Internet companies. He also has no business affiliations with organizations except with those for which he creates content as a freelancer.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Electric is the way to go.
The electric vehicles are able to totally offer room for
new industries to spring up.

- the source of the electricity to the vehicle - be it
battery or whatever is where we can excel.

Oil dependancy is not cool.
Posted by Donald.Nagy@...
5th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
What is the environmental impact of electric cars?
Great news its it? New electric vehicles for our roads. Question, if these vehicles do not recharge themselves then that would mean we need more energy generation, correct? But how is that possible when we do not produce enough in the summer months to meet our current energy needs? I believe it would mean we need to employ novel old ideas such as wind mills or solar power; however they still would not generate enough electricity. Keep in mind the lose factor. Well we can build more coal fire power plants but that will run into issues with the CO2 is bad movement. There is natural gas I guess, recycle I guess, however all of these will not adequately deal with the issue of generating enough electricity to power 25% or more of the current number of cars as electric cars. Hey I got it, lets build more nuclear power plants. That?s it! Great solution! The only thing to worry about is run away budgets (means high future taxes), failing reactors and the that little pesky thing called nuclear waste with half lives of thousands of years. Oh well small price to pay to avoid using that ?poisonous? and natural earth producing and for a confused sum, life on earth ending oil which when burnt actually helps feed plants. After all CO2 is leading to global warming, right and who wants that? I take nuclear waste any day of the weak over CO2, wouldn?t you when compared to that? I mean what is the worse we can expect form nuclear waste if it enters the air or our water stream? It WILL only kill all things it comes in contact with, cause cancer, birth defects, infertility etc. I mean there have been numerous cases of US citizens suing their government for the spill of petrol on our roads or burning of fossil fuels due to cancer or other ailments no? Oh that was the case with nuclear waste. Well there is a direct cause and affect no between CO2 and birth defects? No, Oh. But there is still that global warming I mean climate change , I mean global, well you know what I mean.

P.S. just to make sure we have enough electricity in the system for electric cars the global government will make sure everyone will have installed smart meters to charge you double the rate in case you decide to do your laundry etc. when it is convent for you and your family. Remember big brother or fat mother requires you to do your part, do as or are told, for the planet of course or pay dearly if not.

Now we know the reason behind the global CO2 scam, global governance and compliance. We are now ?free? as long as we do what we are told when we are told.
Posted by mario@...
5th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Move over big oil: auto makers charged up by utilities
mario,

You seem to be anti-electric. Last week I read of a "fuel cell"
that produced electricity from natural gas.

Would you be against this solution? No nuclear waste is involved.
The article did not define the products of generation. But it
might be an alternative.

Changing the power plant for generating movement directly
from burning hydro-carbons, to one that accepts electricity
seems to be a step forward.

You can still generate the electricity from a gasoline powered
generator. Would you have more or less freedom to choose which
fuel to use, with an electric motor driving the wheels?
Posted by just.a.guy
5th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Re: mario's post
Mario has a point, though.

Do any of the existing (or "up and coming") sources of electricity match efficiency of petrol in terms of cost and well-to-wheel losses, availability and lack of potential doom (i.e. nuclear)?

In most countries, the vast majority of electricity is generated by fossil fuels, be it coal or gas or whatever.
Petrol is actually a quite efficient way to get fossil fuel power into your engine - currently more efficient than the any of the electrical routes that I can see. I'd like to be wrong, though!
Posted by exolon
7th Mar 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!