Follow this blog:
RSS

Is a client based future possible?

By | September 20, 2009, 10:29 AM PDT

Last week I discussed the future of clouds and what clouds their forecast. This weekend the skies over my head opened up.

Maybe this Sunday we should talk about an alternate future. A client-driven future.

What drove my writing last week was Cory Doctorow’s view that a cloud-based future was frightening and dangerous.

When your data is in a cloud anyone — the government, employers, thieves, frenemies — might get your data, and use it against you.

The iPhone offers one glimpse of how a client-based future might start. The iPhone is everywhere, and it has 8 Gigabytes of storage, plus broadband for moving that data around fast.

Handheld clients like the iPhone are the next big thing. To succeed in the market companies like Google will have to go the iPhone one better. So far their offerings have just driven more customers to the iPhone — why buy a copy when you can get the original?

In this new client-driven world your home PC can be a server. At CompuTex I saw storage systems with several terabytes of capacity. My son’s game machine has nearly a terabyte itself — that’s nearly one thousand gigabytes.

Data storage capacity is not an issue. Access to that data is not an issue, thanks to the iPhone. You are, in fact, spoiled for choice.

Question. Where do you want all this data to live? If you’re putting a DVD collection online, you may want it near your TV. If you’re looking for home security or medical applications maybe it should live near your wireless router.

What you want, in the end, is a home network. You want all that data, and more, available wherever it is wanted — at your thermostat, on the bedroom TV, as a report sent to your doctor.

But how will yo control it?

Making this happen has been the holy grail of PC giants like Microsoft and Apple for years. There are even open source alternatives like Open Remote coming onstream.

What’s needed is a “killer app” that will turn that capability into market demand that shoots through the “s” curve of the market, that takes us in short from something a few geeks play with to something everyone has to have. What Apple did with the iPhone.

And maybe Apple is the answer here. If Apple would just got its “I gotta control everything” head out from its behind, and realize that an open app store is in its best interest (or if Google built one worth using) we could see that handheld client becoming the control point for all the other clients around you.

Well, that’s coming. What marketers do is take capability and turn it into products and services that are easy to install, fun to use and cheap as chips.

It’s no further away from us than that cloud future I discussed last week.

Which will you choose?

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Technology

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
If you want to have control over your data...
...then you must exercise control over your data. This means figuring out
how to locally host it, and most importantly, having a mechanism and
routine for backup and disaster recovery.

The "cloud" concept is popular because it provides an easy answer to
those problems. But it also requires a whole lot of faith that your cloud
provider is always going to be reliable, secure, and "there". Personally, I
don't have that kind of faith.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
21st Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
yo!
=D

I will never trust a 'cloud.' Give me total physical control over my data, please and thank you. That goes quintuple for any of my clients. If they want to go 'cloud' it's entirely their call, I won't recommend it. And when they fubar some important document due to the confusion as to where it physically resides I'll be ready with a smile and a "told you so!"
Posted by pgit
21st Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Clouds represent an enormous change
I think the two comments so far illustrate just how far "cloud"
companies must go in order to offer the market assurance.

The problem is it will take an enormous amount of knowledge, and
some software, to automate local back-up in the way you want. And
what happens if there's a fire? Or a flood?

New Orleans hospitals that had local backup lost their records.

Maybe the answer isn't either, but both.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
21st Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is a client based future possible?
I think it's called the MAINFRAME of today, servers instead of a single big box. And outsourced to boot.
Posted by knudson
21st Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
LOL-- I'm so excited I can hardly contain myself
"What?s needed is a ?killer app? that will turn that capability into market demand that shoots through the ?s? curve of the market, that takes us in short from something a few geeks play with to something everyone has to have."
------------------------------------
You're absolutely right. I'll email you soon. happy
Posted by kckn4fun
21st Sep 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.