Follow this blog:
RSS

Invention may lead to greener power plants

By | April 22, 2011, 5:21 AM PDT

Students have invented a smokestack that fights climate change by collecting carbon dioxide and turning it into something that’s actually useful. But whatever that thing is, they’re not telling — at least not yet.

The invention, developed by students at Michigan Technological University, attacks the problem of carbon emissions in the same spirit as other carbon scrubbers. It consists of a 11-foot portable smokestack that’s filled with glass beads. As emitted gases rise upwards, a special liquid that drips down continuously from the top absorbs as much as half of the carbon dioxide that passes through.

As appealing as carbon scrubbing methods are, they haven’t quite caught on the way renewable energy efforts have. The reason for this primarily has to do with the fact that capturing, compressing and storing carbon dioxide is a pricey operation for power companies, with much of the costs ending up being tacked on to customers’ utilities bill.

And we’re not talking a small lump of change here. For instance, it’s estimated that a consumer would end up paying on average 57 percent more if the energy was supplied by a power plant equipped with carbon scrubbing technology. However, an existing plant that is retrofitted to accommodate carbon scrubbers can cost the consumer upwards of 290 percent more, according to a study conduced by the Princeton Environmental Institute.

“This is a very expensive technique, which is probably why we do not see it commonly employed in industry,” says MTU student Brett Spigarelli, a member of the research team.

However, their device uses a process that goes a step further than other scrubbers and binds the carbon in a solid form. The result is an undisclosed product that can be used as a construction material, while the liquid itself can be recovered and reused. All this, they feel, makes their invention a more attractive option for power companies.

This approach is somewhat similar to the one taken by the tech start-up SkyMine Corporation, which uses sequestered carbon to produce baking soda — of all things.

The group has applied for a patent and hopes to build a pilot plant in cooperation with Carbontec Energy Corporation, an industry partner. In the meantime, the group is working on improvements that would allow the scrubber remove even more carbon dioxide.

Photo: George Olszewski/MTU

More from SmartPlanet’s Earth Day Special Feature 2011:

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tuan C. Nguyen

About Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Contributing Editor

Tuan C. Nguyen is a freelance science journalist based in New York City. He has written for the U.S. News and World Report, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, AOL, Yahoo! News and LiveScience. Formerly, he was reporter and producer for the technology section of ABCNews.com. He holds degrees from the University of California Los Angeles and the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
The mystery output
If the resulting product can be used as a construction material, it makes me wonder if it's not limestone or some other carbonate. This could be used in concrete mixes. Since carbonates are fairly cheap already, by itself this process probably won't be economical, but I guess you have to add in carbon removal at some subsidized price.
Posted by zackers
22nd Apr 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Not unlike algae fixation....
...which works on a small scale, but is difficult to scale and has a
very pricey upcharge for the power user. I have not seen a single
carbon sequestration method that doesn't have these downsides,
and while it is laudable to continue the search and have these
things on the shelf in case the price of fossil fuel energy
skyrockets, making these technologies economical, I really think
that low/no carbon solutions, including energy efficiency is a
much more palatable path to take. After all, keeping the coal in
the ground and using another energy source may prove to be the
cheapest carbon sequestration strategy out there.
Posted by klassman6
23rd Apr 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Form of carbon fiber?
The only thing I can think of is that as the liquid drips it lays deposits that are akin to carbon stalactites. The fluid is collected for reuse while the carbon is collected and processed for sale.

Carbon fiber feed stock can be pricy so a cost effective solution could make the scrubbing a break even proposition. A break even scrubbing operation would be an improvement over current scrubbing methods.
Posted by Hates Idiots
25th Apr 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!