Follow this blog:
RSS

International Space Station to host space’s most accurate clock

By | July 28, 2010, 11:06 PM PDT

The International Space Station is about to get a new clock, one that will officially hold the title of “most accurate clock ever launched into space.” It’ll be a whopping 100 times more accurate than even the fantastically accurate clocks on GPS satellites.

Both the ISS’s new clock and some terrestrial clocks, like the one used by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to keep the US’s official time, are cesium (also spelled caesium) clocks. Cesium clocks work by cooling cesium atoms, then measuring the frequency of the microwave signals emitted by their electrons when that energy level is changed. It’s a fantastically precise way of telling time–but it could be better.

The problem with terrestrial cesium clocks is gravity. Says New Scientist:

On Earth, the accuracy of caesium clocks is limited by gravity. The atoms are cooled by using lasers to slow them down, then tossed upwards into a cavity where measurements are made to determine the precise frequency of microwave radiation that they absorb and emit. In microgravity, the atoms linger in the cavity, allowing for longer and more accurate measurements, explains John Prestage of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, who is not involved in the project.

That tiny anomaly caused by gravity may not seem like a big deal–after all, the NIST’s cesium clock is gauged to only lose or gain one second in 60 million years–but you can always be more accurate. The ISS’s cesium clock is estimated to be “at least” 100 times more accurate than the clocks on GPS satellites, which are already used for syncing on Earth.

When the ISS’s clock is launched in 2014, it’ll provide a single source for incredibly accurate time, allowing us to better synchronize ourselves here on Earth.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dan Nosowitz

About Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowtiz was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet in 2010.

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz

Contributing Editor, Technology

Dan Nosowitz has written for Popular Science, Fast Company and Gizmodo. He holds a degree from McGill University in Canada. He is based in New York.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: International Space Station to host space's most accurate clock
What a waste of money!
Posted by psavage
29th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: International Space Station to host space's most accurate clock
Someone or something needs greater precision than +-1 second every 60,000,000 years? I don't think so.
Posted by flupher
29th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: International Space Station to host space's most accurate clock
No, it is not a waste of money. As the article says, there are ways to find uses for even more accurate time-keeping.

I wish they had named some, I can't think of really compelling examples off the top of my head either. But clearly it gives more accurate measures of frequencies and therefore distances when using radar or lidar, and those can be useful.
Posted by mejohnsn
29th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: International Space Station to host space's most accurate clock
The article doesn't mention accounting for relativistic effects. The GPS satellite's clocks lose about 7 microseconds a day because of them so this clock would have to as well to be used for accurate surface level timing.
Posted by riverat1
29th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: International Space Station to host space's most accurate clock
riverat1's point is well taken, and the speed of the ISS relative to earth must be incredibly precisely accounted for to beat the Einstein effect.
Posted by jwill@...
29th Jul 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!