Follow this blog:
RSS

Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user’s side

By | October 20, 2009, 8:55 AM PDT

Day after tomorrow, Windows 7 goes public. I’m not getting too excited because previous versions have been frustrating and disappointing. And I, for one, am neither attending nor hosting a Windows 7 party.

But my lack of enthusiasm should not be mistaken for apathy. I truly hope Windows 7 is a better Windows.

As a journalist, I have a long association with Windows.  I covered it for years and after a short hiatus ramped up my coverage of Windows 7 earlier this spring. For most of the coverage, I was editor or news editor at PC Week (now eWeek) which celebrates its 25 birthday this year. Windows and PC Week grew up together and are the same age more or less.

In the past, a new version of Windows meant an infusion of advertising dollars from Microsoft and its vast software community. Those good times are no longer rolling in the much challenged publishing world.

I either covered Windows or edited its coverage in PC Week from Windows 1.0 in 1985 to XP which has to be well over 20 versions. Interestingly, one Microsoft “Windows Desktop Timeline” starts in 1990 and gives but scant mention to Windows 1.0-3x and Windows 9x (as in WIndows 95). Alas, Microsoft has a complete “Windows History” web page.  Did you know Microsoft actually introduced Windows in 1983 with no version number? I sorta remember that.

Those were days. Really buggy versions of Windows well into the 90s kept tech scribes like me very busy.

As with all previous versions of Windows, I am praying that WIndows 7 is a better Windows like the reviewers are saying. How shall I describe the essence of XP and previous versions of  Windows: Necessary evil? Mediocre? A kludge? Maddening? Minimally reliable? It works the it works most of the time? Inferior to the Mac?

The computing public wants a better Windows. Is Windows 7 that  Windows? The tech scribes seem to be saying yes, but just as with the Boeing 787, the public won’t know until they fly in one.

I have been using the Windows 7 release candidate since May on a netbook. It’s got some features that could make me more productive once I integrate them into my work life as a freelance writer and blogger. Here’s what I am looking for: fewer updates that disrupt my workflow, better security, rock solid reliability as in no more crashes or looooong lockups, ease of managing files, multiple screens and Windows itself, fast browsing and much faster boot up and shut down.

I want basic things and never expected Windows to signifcantly change my world. I simply want some basic improvements.

Windows 7 has some of these things and I offered my first impression of Windows 7 at my personal blog, The Dodge Retort. And I wrote a follow up. But I confess that I went back to XP on another netbook because it got the job done faster (I skipped Vista which since Windows 7 emerged has been written off largely as a disaster).

Recently, I started using Windows 7 again because I know the freight train is coming. Lord knows, the U.S. economy could use a boost and in the past, Windows has ignited the tech market which in turn jump started a somnabulent economy.

Here’s the deal. I have been in the market for a new laptop. Overstock.com has some great deals on refurbished laptops for about $300 that come with XP. I almost bought one Saturday night, but told myself to wait a few weeks to see if the factory “refurbs” switch over to Windows 7 (30 day warranties also scared me away).

I always did wanted the latest and I sincerely hope this Windows 7 is the greatest Windows yet. Frequent occurrences of great and Windows in the same sentence are long overdue.

Follow me on Twitter.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

John Dodge

About John Dodge

John Dodge was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

John Dodge

John Dodge

Contributing Editor, Technology

John Dodge has written for the Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, PC Week (now eWeek), EDN, Design News, Electronic Business, Bio-IT World, Health-IT World, Lowell Sun, Haverhill Gazette and Newburyport Daily News. He is based in Massachusetts.

Follow him on Twitter.

John Dodge

John Dodge

John Dodge prides himself on completely independent journalism. His opinions, observations and reporting are not influenced by any financial holdings. He holds no shares in computer, electronics, software or Internet companies. He also has no business affiliations with organizations except with those for which he creates content as a freelancer.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user's side
"Here?s what I am looking for: fewer updates that disrupt my workflow, better security, rock solid reliability as in no more crashes or looooong lockups, ease of managing files, multiple screens and Windows itself, fast browsing and much faster boot up and shut down."

Then stop buying 2nd rate hardware at overstock.com. Stop running it on a Netbook for which is WAS NOT designed. Get used to updates as they are the only thing keeping you even close to even with the evolution of malware.

Or, go get a MAC (no security updates needed there or so says Jobs' crew) or a Linux load (have multi-screens galore) but stop writing inane blather about how Windows isn't what you want. Frankly, if you treat any OS right it will treat you right and you haven't been from what you've alluded to in your post.

That's my professional opinion for free BTW. A BS in Computer Science and 14 years supporting Windows, Unix, Linux and OS X.
Posted by Mabrick
20th Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user's side
I've been running Windows 7 on a laptop for about a month now. As a Microsoft Action Pack Subscriber, I was able to download the final version from their digital distribution network.

Having removed Vista from the laptop (an older Dell) I have noticed a speed increase with 7. So far, things have been nice and stable, and I'm happy. The best part was that Windows 7 came pre-loaded with all the drivers that I needed. I didnt have to download a thing.

I agree that quality hardware, combined with quality drivers, is the answer to Windows stability for any version. Microsoft has done their part, so now we wait for the hardware vendors to do the same. Here's to device manufacturers following Microsoft guidelines for drivers! So say we all happy
Posted by dnev
20th Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user's side
"Get a Mac!" People have been telling that for 20 years. Maybe I should just go do it. My neighbor did after using a PC for years and she's still adjusting after two months. We did have an iMac and it frustrated the hell out us. It broke just as frequently as the PC. Getting it back was more challenging than the PC.

Point well taken on malware...I run Malwarebyte's anti-malware program even at the whiff of a problem.

>>>Frankly, if you treat any OS right it will treat you right and you haven't been from what you've alluded to in your post. That assertion misses my point entirely. Like everyone else, I just want it to work so I can get my job done. You know, like a car. I don't to have to fiddle with it every time I use it.

Treating an OS right is overhead time, ergo wasted non-productive time IMO...such efforts are to be minimized unless you like doing that.


.
Posted by John Dodge
21st Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user's side
If you want to buy a cheaopo laptop, but with a decent warranty - Head off to Dell's Outlet.

Just a shame the Mini 10's they are selling have the crummy 3 cell battery.
Posted by neilpost
22nd Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user's side
History is not on anyone's side with any operating system. I used Win95 on my Compaq computers until last year, when I downgraded to Vista. I was amazed at the lack of progress between 95 and Vista. After a year of updates, Vista seems to be as stable as 95. And for what I use my computers for (business mostly) the only thing that's improved is the speed, which is due to hardware and not the O/S. That is my $0.02 worth.

Posted by ITOdeed
22nd Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
I ditched Windows entirely rather than switch to Vista
Back in March, I too saw the way the wind was blowing (though this was before Win 7 was much on the horizon), and decided if I had to upgrade from XP sooner or later anyway, I might as well bite the bullet and switch to Linux rather than Vista. So seven months later, still running Xubuntu, I have a system that's fast, secure, free, and offers me all the eye candy I care for plus plenty of free extra software that (once installed) updates itself automatically.

I'm sure Windows 7 will be a substantial improvement over Vista, but personally, I can't see how it would be an overall improvement (for me, anyway) over *buntu.
Posted by LeonBA
22nd Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user's side
I also use Ubuntu. On occasion, I boot XP, but only because of certain DOS apps that I have used for years and have yet to find better "windows (Windows and Linux)" counterparts. Once people start learning about "Wubi" (running Ubuntu in a Windows directory), they may never upgrade to another version of Windows again. I run Ubuntu (Wubi) on my desktop and one lap-top and a dedicated Ubuntu on another lap-top. I will say I had a lot fewer problems with Ubuntu than Windows. I also don't need to spend hours finding out what runs and what doesn't with each new version. I also don't need to "dump" my data and reload as the case in some "new version" of Windows. I can also access my data in Windows directories well running Ubuntu. I cannot access Ubuntu directories under Windows (the couple of programs that tout the ability work once and quit afterwards).
Posted by bobc4012@...
22nd Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user's side
I have no hope for MS ever putting out another decent OS. Spent a bunch of money on a Windoze Vista laptop for my wife, wanted to go Mac but could not see spending the extra money, what a huge mistake. and now they want me to spend $120 to fix their crap???? Have they no decency??? I read that Windows 7 is only about 10% faster which to me isn't even close to fast enough.

I will buy my wife a Macbook Pro and load Ubuntu on her laptop, it runs really nice with Ubuntu.

No more M$ crap for me thank you.
Posted by Goldcds
22nd Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user's side
It is not everything but now windows 7 is the best operation system for normal users. Linux is very hard to use and Mac is too expensive if you do business you can not install these system for all people without spend more money and time to train your workers.
--------------
Free Articles
Posted by Tina10
24th Oct 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Hopeful on Windows 7, but history is not on user's side
Hmm well I've teied it and... If it was my first computer and I used this I might well like it a lot. However it is not my first computer and that is largly the problem. I have thousands of pounds worth of software ALL of which run fine on XP and having tried it almost none of which will run or even install properly on Windows 7. I'm sorry but I do not have the kind of money it would take to replace all my software. Most of which is no more than a year or two old. Further, as with vista, 7 has a problem recognising and installing drivers for some of the simplest USB devices. Even drivers that are supposedly win 7 compliant do not seem to install 100% smoothly. Lastly as for the security. It's a joke even as an administrator I am locked large parts of my computer until I "take ownership" of them. Maybe microsoft will get their collective fingers out and sort some of these problems with SP1 but for all the faster boot up and shut down speed and pretty looks of it. I think I'll stick with my warm, cuddly and VERY user friendly XP.
Posted by Humphty
5th Nov 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!