Follow this blog:
RSS

Here’s how a startup plans to extract gold from asteroids

By | April 25, 2012, 4:00 AM PDT

Recent evidence suggests that, during earth’s humble beginnings, a violent hailstorm of asteroids supplied not only the ingredients neccesary for life, but also all the essential resources to sustain it.

In fact, it’s likely that all the gold, iron, platinum and wealth of other precious minerals essential for economic and technological prosperity came originally from the rain of asteroids that pelted the Earth shortly after the crust cooled. The problem now, though, is that inital gift of rich natural resources is on track to be exhausted within 50-60 years, according to a report in New Scientist.

One way to replenish the earth’s reserves, proposed by a team of distinguished scientists, is to simply go straight to the source. To accomplish this, Peter Diamandis, creator of the reknowned X-Prize Foundation, and Eric Anderson Chairman of the Board of the Space Spaceflight Federation, have formed Planetary Resources, a venture to bring “the natural resources of space within humanity’s economic sphere of influence,” according to the company’s web site.

The company is backed by a group of industry big wigs that include Filmmaker James Cameron, former Presidential Candidate Ross Perot and Google co-founder Larry Page. Ultimately, it is their hope that in due time “water from asteroids will fuel the in-space economy, and rare metals will increase Earth’s GDP.”

But just how much money being pumped into the economy are we talking about here? Well, for some perspective, Astronomer John S. Lewis postulated that a relatively small metallic asteroid with a diameter of one mile contained more than $20 trillion worth of industrial and precious metals.

[To learn more about natural resources of the extra-terrestrial varierty, check out Lewis´ book “Mining The Sky: Untold Riches From The Asteroids, Comets, And Planets.”]

While tapping into this treasure trove of valuable metals will involve more than just handing pick axes and a shovels to a bunch of space-bound astronauts, it’s apparently very doable, according to Astronomer Phil Plait. On his blog, Bad Astronomy, Plait laid out a four step plan based on specific details provided to him by Planetary Resources President and Chief Engineer Chris Lewicki.

Here’s a brief sketch of how asteroid mining will work:

1. The first phase of the plan begins with the launching of a series of small space telescopes to scout potential near-earth asteroids. The first of these, the Arkyd 101, is already being built and is scheduled to hitch a ride aboard a rocket sometime near the end of 2013. Eventually, scientists hope to send the telescopes directly to prospective asteroids to gather samples and at the same time get a closer look.

2. Once a target asteroid is identified, the spacecraft would be used to collect “volatiles” such as water, oxygen and nitrogen. These can be stored in depots, which can be thought of as supply stations for astronauts on lengthy missions in outer space. The price of a bottle of water may be about a dollar on earth, but costs as much as $20,000 per liter to get water into space.

3. Mining for precious metals is where it gets really tricky. Scientists may decide to send a equipment to start mining on-site or to tow the rock to a more manageable location such as an orbit around the moon or directly back to earth.

4. Making a profit from this experiment is the one aspect of this whole ambitious operation that still needs to be hashed out. But the founders believe that once they show how feasable the idea is, business possibilities will materialize. Just laying a foundation for such an industry is the foremost goal.

Plait, despite his reputation as a rigorous skeptic, gave a suprisingly strong endorsement of the project. He even enthusiastically stated, “I love this idea. Love it.”

However, some may argue that the whole notion of asteroid mining sends the wrong message regarding how we should go about managing our natural resources. Instead of looking to devour more, shouldn’t we be focusing on how best to make due with what we have and practice some restraint? In fact, there has recently been some promising research into ways we can even recycle such materials. For instance, last week, Honda announced a breakthrough that would allow for the recycling of rare earth metals from the nickel-metal hydride batteries for its used hybrid cars.

Still, technological progress is moving at such a rapid pace that tapping into otherworldly sources may soon become more of an imperative than an option. Also, let’s not forget that any hope for advancing renewable energy technologies such as solar panels and wind trubines relies heavily on the availability of terbium, yttrium, dysprosium, europium and neodymium — all rare earth metals that are quickly being depleted.

But what are your thoughts? The forum is yours.

Side note: Had to bump the vehicle of the future post to tommorow. Sorry, but this is a big story.

(via Discover)

The latest on space exploration:

More Outer Space mysteries on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tuan C. Nguyen

About Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Contributing Editor

Tuan C. Nguyen is a freelance science journalist based in New York City. He has written for the U.S. News and World Report, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, AOL, Yahoo! News and LiveScience. Formerly, he was reporter and producer for the technology section of ABCNews.com. He holds degrees from the University of California Los Angeles and the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Ambitious and Optimistic
This is ambitious in that this program will try to harvest valuable resources for use on Earth. It is optimistic in the idea that the resources will pay for the planning, development and execution of a program to get to those resources.

This is a bit like the Spanish who conquered the new world in search of gold and silver to send back to Spain. Ironically, the additional gold devalued the Spanish currency (like printing money, the additonal gold reduced the over all value of the gold in circulation) at a critical time when the English and Dutch governments were developing exploration and sea power.

If this project works then it should be a good thing, if it fails then it should also be a good thing to learn to avoid problems that led to failure. At this time it is just the dreams of science fiction.
Posted by sboverie
25th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Space resources are essential for a transition to a more equitable future
All of us use energy and material resources by virtue of being alive. The essential thing for our civilization to do is to minimize the impact on the Earth's biosphere from human activity.

Making use of the energy and materials in the ocean of space that surrounds our planet is an excellent way to minimize the impact of the growing middle classes in the developing world. It is not only ethically imperative that the developed world help uplift the standard of living but beneficial to all to create a sustainable and equitable world. We know historically that as access to energy increases (which is the same as saying when people become more wealthy) that the rate of population decreases. But we must take care to not overstress the biosphere in the process. By using resources already in space to provide energy and high value materials, we can break out of the zero sum game mythology that forces billions into poverty and hopelessness.
Posted by Gregg Maryniak
25th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Supply & demand
Only rare earth metals are valuable enough to justify obtaining them by asteroid mining. Such big new supplies will drive down the prices without corresponding increases in demand. Limiting production will keep prices high but may also drive up the cost of production in terms of money per unit of metal. And they'll have to factor in the possibility of future low cost replacements as Nguyen mentioned. All this has to be figured out before they start spending big on design, let alone construction.
Posted by theotherwill
25th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Self-serving, self-limiting, or just a self-annihilating idea?
Mining asteroids for the purpose of space travel deeper into space is one thing and our only long term option. Mining asteroids to satisfy human greed on earth, or to continue to expand the already over human population, and or to satisfy the base human lust for "sparkly" things - is just plain willful ignorance. Here are a few reasons that come to mind immediately:
- Limited technical resources are not the planets main problem. It's more people than life critical resources available - which asteroid precious element mining isn't going to affect at all.
- Not addressing and managing the "people to resources ratio problem" directly is going to be far more serious than limited precious metals and rare earth elements - as in asteroid mining won't feed them.
- Any space program that doesn't directly enhance our ability to get our species off this planet permanently and give us some species continuity insurance - i.e. space colonization is a waste of opportunity, time and resources.
- Rare earth elements are not critical resources to life itself. The resources that are - are also too bulky to bring back to earth - i.e. phosphates from the moon and asteroids. Funding such a program through profits from asteroid goodies may actually shrink the critical resource/time window we have to implement an effective space colonization program, though admittedly it may be the only way any space program moves ahead in a serious way. In any case much care would be needed regarding prioritization and the "laws of unintended consequences.
- The on ground liability of returning any significant amount of materials from space would be - no pun intended - "astronomical." The potential kinetic energy damage from a "space freighter" in free fall from orbit would be greater than a nuclear weapon - sans radioactivity - and if it hit your neighbor who could keep them from thinking it wasn't a purposeful act of war? Think "Rod from God" concept.
- If your mining asteroids or the moon proved wildly successful and became a large scale enterprise the ultimate mass of the materials brought back to the earth over time could potentially change the earth's mass and it's orbital characteristics and that wouldn't likely be a good thing either. You think climate change from CO2 might be a problem - wait to our increased mass starts becoming more attractive to the suns gravity even in the smallest ways.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
Updated - 26th Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
The Real Wealth
Many people following the common thought they work in a wheel made by the system in wich need to work,to produce to consume. It sells their time for a waged work, many times neglecting our affections and passions, don't realizing that the real wealth is a full life of passions in wich you manage your time,stay with our family, to do that that you have always dreamed, just changing our way to see the things get out by this wheel... http://www.minimalistgeneration.com
Posted by minimalistgeneration
9th Apr
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!