By Tuan Nguyen
Posting in Technology
Google reps recently gave a filmed presentation that explained the technology behind autonomous vehicles.
When word spread that Google was testing a self-driving car, the technology was heralded as the transportation wave of the future. Programmed with optimal fuel efficiency and safety in mind, the company claimed that it can reduce car accident by half. But despite some nifty navigational chops, beneath it all, isn't it still a heartless, calculating robot making some potentially life or death decisions?
It's these kinds of concerns that was a cause for alarm for some when it was reported that Google was lobbying the state of Nevada to bestow driver-less cars with street legal status. And it was only a couple months later that such fears were realized when one of their test cars collided with a street vehicle driving nearby the company's Mountain View, California headquarters. Google's response to the accident was to basically say that it wasn't their fault.
- Related: Google pushes to legalize self-driving cars
- Related: Google’s self-driving car gets a green light from Nevada
In an email, a Google spokesperson told the Mountain View Voice, "We regret that a Google driver recently caused a minor accident, and we're grateful that no one was hurt...Safety is our top priority. One of our goals is to prevent fender-benders like this one, which occurred while a person was manually driving the car."
And perhaps to assuage any heightened anxieties the public might have about cruising alongside fully autonomous automobiles, the company recently gave a filmed presentation at the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems in San Francisco in which they go through an in-depth nuts and bolts explanation of how the technology works.
During the roughly 15 minute talk, project head Sebastian Thrun and Google engineer Chris Urmson detailed the inner workings of the car's roof-mounted range finder, a Velodyne 64-beam laser device in which the navigation system is built on.
Other features include:
- Front and rear radar systems that helps the vehicle calibrate its movements based on the speed and positioning of cars on the freeway.
- A camera located near the rear-view mirror that reads traffic lights.
- A GPS inertial measurement unit and wheel encoder that keeps track of the vehicle's changing coordinates.
Google also gave the audience an insiders look at what allows them to feel confident about the safety of the technology: a "multi-layered" approach that combines GPS with exquisitely detailed maps and calculations based on comparisons between real-time and previously recorded data on road conditions. Basically, the computer is in a constant state of ensuring that the sensory information it's receiving is verifiably correct. With all that available data, the computer can take advantage of a command system that can react faster than people to hazards and changing road conditions.
Whether this is enough to make drivers any more comfortable about sharing the road with drones is still something that needs to play out. At the very least, though, assurances are going beyond a earlier stance that amounted to nothing more than blog posts essentially said "just trust us."
(via Discovery News)
- Video: smart navigation system turns car dashboard into interactive 3-D display
- Video: a mind-controlled car
- Car tech might allow the blind to drive
More care-safety technologies:
- BMW’s driver assistance technology may prevent car accidents
- SMARTwheel invention may prevent distracted driving
- New car technology can stop drunks from driving
- Smart car WiFi system can prevent car accidents
- New smartphone innovations may improve driving smarts
- How just a few talking cars can end traffic jams
Oct 20, 2011
Driving safety is the main concern for all and to ensure that many technologists come up with driverless cars and all that, I like my stay here. http://www.ppiclaimuk.org.uk/mis-sold-ppi
Suppose they have done it... it really works... their driver does much better than people driven vehicles.. Unfortunately it may be a de-evolution of people. As technology becomes better and more part of our lives, we lose abilities. We can no longer survive outside our cities with our supermarkets. Isaac Asimov had some really good insights. Some technologies save us, and some diminish us. WE have to be careful with it. Also, the added electromagnetic burden may or may not be a problem. Also, what happens to the radar when mud covers the sensor?
Imagine the safety, fuel, time, and traffic congestion savings when big rigs are driven by robots that keep to the speed limit, can drive longer hours (and thus avoid rush hour traffic), are not pressured to meet a deadline, and don't fall asleep. Forget run-about city cars, the big bucks are in point-to-point, long-haul bulk deliveries and city buses.
The technology will need to be introduced slowly to instill confidence for the average driver. The tech will need to prevent a few accidents that the drivers realize would not have been avoided otherwise. This will only happen with a driver assist system much like anti-lock brakes, not with a totally automated system because every collision or minor bump with an automated system will be big news and one more example that will allow people to say "this won't work." Even if the system works perfectly it doesn't mean that the public will embrace it unless there is confidence and motivation to do so.
hhhhhhhhh, that's right, every one can finally go home safe. just for information, i found this useful link a bout How Google's Self-Driving Car Works (video and illustaion) : http://exotikcar.com/extra/voitures_sans_conducteur_de_google/