Follow this blog:
RSS

GM applies for a trademark on “range anxiety”

By | September 1, 2010, 12:17 AM PDT

GM appears to be arming itself against competitors with all-electric vehicles before it starts selling the Chevy Volt later this year.

The Volt is supposed to run on battery alone for 40 miles before an “internal combustion engine generator” takes over to charge the battery and extend the Volt’s range to 300 miles, GM says.

Its trademark application, which was filed in the U.S. patent office on July 6 (h/t Jalopnik), is for “promoting public awareness of electric vehicle capabilities” — just in case we’re not sure how electric cars work. Should we trust GM to tell us?

“Range anxiety is real,” GM’s Nick Pudar told me in May at Google’s I/O developer conference in San Francisco, where GM was showing off a Volt. “Range is the balance between the battery’s weight and cost and its integration with the vehicle. If you went 100 miles on battery, you’d have no room for anything else.” (Not if you’re going to pay GM prices anyway).

Range anxiety is real, at least in the U.S. The Consumer Electronics Association surveyed 950 people in May and June and found that 71 percent of them feared “running out of electricity while driving.”

But maybe they shouldn’t be so afraid. Remember U.C. Davis professor Andy Frank, who says that with hybrids to cycle energy between their batteries and the grid, plus lots of free chargers, we could achieve energy independence in 15 years?

He also said the average car in the U.S. isn’t driven 40 miles a day — and it sits idle for about 21 hours, which leaves plenty of time to charge the battery.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Deborah Gage

About Deborah Gage

Deborah Gage was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet in 2010.

Deborah Gage

Deborah Gage

Contributing Editor, Technology

Deborah Gage has written for the San Francisco Chronicle, Minnesota Public Radio, Baseline and various magazines and newspapers. She is based in San Francisco.

Follow her on Twitter.

Deborah Gage

Deborah Gage

I pride myself on being an independent journalist. My reporting and writing are not influenced by any financial holdings, and I have no business affiliations with companies other than the publishers I write for as a journalist.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GM applies for a trademark on 'range anxiety'
Someone should tell GM's trademark attorneys about the fact that Nick Pudar is routinely using their "intellectual property" not as a descriptive term (which it is). Another classic example of corporate overreaching.

Carol Shepherd, Attorney
Arborlaw PLC
Ann Arbor, MI
Posted by carush
1st Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GM applies for a trademark on 'range anxiety'
I've yet to see "average car" or, for that matter, an "average driver".
Posted by richgb@...
1st Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GM applies for a trademark on 'range anxiety'
Hmmm. If GM trademarks this, then no one else can use it. If only GM talks about range anxiety, doesn't that imply that only their products are concerned about it, if only they (presumably) have to use the term? Sounds like a major marketting oops.
Posted by sfields@...
1st Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GM applies for a trademark on 'range anxiety'
Agree, cars are not designed or bought for 'averages'. If that was the case all I needed was a car that could run at 2 miles per hour... as I drive an average of 50 miles per day. Jokes aside, I will stick with a regular car or a range extended one - until the day where here are recharging stations every 10-20 miles AND I feel like stopping a couple of hours to recharge every 40 miles or so on my weekend trips
Posted by tuxenan
1st Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GM applies for a trademark on 'range anxiety'
Great for the 5 days a week that I only need a local car I can buy a Volt, but for the 2 days that I need to actually go somewhere, I guess I will also have to keep my Buick. I am sure that most people have the extra money and space to keep an extra car around for those "short" trips. Just like most people have enough money for that extra home on the lake or in the mountains. As it is for me, my bike will have to continue to suffice as my "second" car. At least I can hang it up in my garage.
Posted by littlemas2@...
1st Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
GM fud AGAIN!
GM led the electric car game before. They had a jump on the
market and they had waiting lists for electric cars they would only
lease. Those cars (Ev1's) had a 120 mile range. They would not let
any of the leasees purchase the cars and took the back to crush
them. They spent their whole "marketing campaign" on making
sure the consumer was afraid and confused about the new viable
technology. They wanted to sink a new thing that made their old
mainstay look bad. The Ev1 with todays battery technology would
have a zero-emission range of well I've 300 miles with no
generator, and it would be faster than most sport sedan on the
market.
If this sounds outlandish to you, watch the movie "Who Killed the
Electric Car". It is a sad story.
Posted by sir4taye@...
1st Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GM applies for a trademark on 'range anxiety'
my travel to work is 35 miles each way. they assume that the vehicle would be charged at work and home to get the 21 hours of rest time. even if you can not charge the gas engine charges the batteries for you so there really is no need to stop every 15 minutes or have 2 cars as some state. we have 3 cars, I always have a spare when others have problems.
Posted by johnmc123
1st Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GM applies for a trademark on 'range anxiety'
"U.C. Davis professor Andy Frank, who says that with hybrids to cycle energy between their batteries and the grid ..." is, at best, at bad joke.

There is a down loadable spreadsheet at http:// bit.ly/auHe4d (at the bottom) that analyses this scenario. Basically, a good percentage of the stored energy is consumed in transporting the energy from home to charging station.

To minimize energy waste, the battery should be charged at the point where the energy is needed and consumed from that point on. Using an EV to schlep stored energy from the home to a charging station is inefficient and wasteful. The electric grid is inefficient enough on its own, especially in long distance transmission.
Posted by msd1107
1st Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GM applies for a trademark on 'range anxiety'
someone needs to reach out and slap GM upside the head. both words are in common use and when I hear it it, it is usually someone worried about phone bars.
Posted by zclayton3
2nd Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GM applies for a trademark on 'range anxiety'
Some of you are getting the Leaf and Volt mixed up.
The Volt you could actually drive cross country but it requires Premium gas. (I wonder if the engineer who thought that up still has a job) And then there's the Leaf... I could beat it in a 45 mile race with my bicycle. Imagine trying to go cross country with that.
Posted by donnert
11th Sep 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!