Follow this blog:
RSS

Dogs prove Darwin right in survival of the cutest

By | January 21, 2010, 8:32 AM PST

Here are two questions that may amuse you this morning:

  1. Who’s proving Darwin right?
  2. Who’s a good boy?

The answer to both is, your dog.

This is an experiment that has been running 150 years, since the beginning of the “purebred” dog craze, about the same time Darwin’s Origin of the Species was published.

Abby Drake of Holy Cross and Chris Klingenberg of the University of Manchester, in England, compared the skull shapes of domestic dogs with those of other carnivores.

They found as much variability in dogs’ heads as in the whole order, which goes back 60 million years. And the diversity among companion dogs — dogs bred as pets — showed more variability than in all other breeds put together.

Many of these skull shapes are entirely new, Klingenberg noted. Artificial selection has put doggie evolution into hyperdrive.

Take for example this little fellow. My kids found him on the street in early 1997. He was so cute, who could resist him?

I tried. As you can see for two weeks he stayed outside, on the back steps. (You may be able to make out the leash.) But cuteness won out, and Browny has had a long, happy life. He is nearly 14, arthritic, takes pills for his joints and pills for the pain.

In evolutionary terms his dad has been a big success. I still see dogs around whom I’m certain are Browny’s cousins. They’re cross-bred mutts with a distinct strain of shepherd. I call them Kirkwood dogs, after the neighborhood where we live.

This is happening fairly randomly, but most dog evolution is highly planned. Breeders, like those showing off at the Westminster dog show next month, are hooking up dogs for looks, amiability, and a minimum of traits familiar in their wild cousins.

Or consider what I found when I visited China last year. There were a host of dogs, all spoiled rotten, miniature versions of popular working breeds. I called them bonzai dogs.

The result is that many of today’s dogs would be unimaginable in Darwin’s time. Evolution can happen unconsciously, in reaction to changing climate and conditions, or consciously, through human intervention.

Evolution is not some theory about chimpanzees. It happens in real time, before our eyes, with our help. And we’re responsible for the results.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dana Blankenhorn

About Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Contributing Editor, Technology

Dana Blankenhorn has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement and founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media. He holds degrees from Rice and Northwestern universities. He is based in Atlanta.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Dogs prove Darwin right in survival of the cutest
Cute dog!
Posted by John Dodge
21st Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Dogs prove Darwin right in survival of the cutest
This is a brilliant description of observed evolution. I always find it difficult to articulate to people real life examples. This will definitely help me in my future discussions.
Posted by kevin@...
21st Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Good point...
...and similar to what happens in agriculture: http://www.amazon.com/Botany-Desire-Plants-Eye-View-World/dp/0375760393
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
22nd Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
JohnMcGrew@...
You make a good point here. Observable evolution is very easily
observed in plants.

Carrots for instance. I have heard it tell that Holland uses orange
as a national color in part because they created the first orange
carrots, and made a bundle off them.

Back in Columbus' day carrots came in a rainbow of colors, none of
them orange.

Now, thanks in part to Luther Burbank, who created some great carrot
varietels, we can't think of carrots as being any color other than
orange.

Or look at pigeons. Pigeon fanciers breed their birds in all sorts of
strange ways. Want feathers on the feet? They'll give you feet you
can't see for the feathers.

Point is you don't need stem cells or gene maps to practice
evolution. Just get hold of something that multiplies quickly and
regularly. It can happen before your eyes....

Again. Great point, John.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
22nd Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Genetic engineering has been taking place for a very long time.
It's only relatively recently that it's been done in a laboratory.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
22nd Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Dogs prove Darwin right in survival of the cutest
Evolution is not the same as natural selection, or in this case artificial selection. If dogs grew thumbs, that would be evolution.
Posted by panchal@...
26th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Dogs prove Darwin right in survival of the cutest
Strictly speaking, the fact that dogs can be bred for different characteristics doesn't contradict any opposing theory. Variability within a species is certainly consistent with Darwin's theory of how evolution takes place, but scientifically speaking, that's about all you can say about it.

Now, all you have to do is breed a dog into a different "kind" and not just a different example of the same species and you can demonstrate what Darwin was talking about.
Posted by steveo@...
26th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Dogs prove Darwin right in survival of the cutest
I wonder why people don't come in as many varieties as dogs. There's certainly been attempts to breed smart and handsome nobles, or stronger slaves. But nothing like the difference between a chihuahua and a great Dane, or a shih tzu and a Chinese crested.

Any ideas about his?
Posted by gaiagraphics
26th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Dogs prove Darwin right in survival of the cutest
I wonder also, why human does not evolve as fast and obvious as the dog..
150 years does not enough for human? maybe it requires much longer then..Human is of course, much more civilized than the dog but why the evolution takes more time for us?..

Well, any ideas?
Posted by azanhk
26th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Dogs prove Darwin right in survival of the cutest
Cute story but to be correct these changes in dogs are not evolution because they remain the same species and are able to breed with each other. Evolution is still a theory although most scientists believe it is a fact. Since no one has been able to actually prove that one species evolved into another species (not even a bacteria or a virus) then evolution remains a theory. Too many teachers play fast and loose with the E word and everyone grows up and thinks adaptation, mutation, genetic change within the species is evolution.

So there isn't anything Darwinian about dog breeding but your words are very clever and I enjoyed your story.
Posted by mersilkee
27th Jan 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!