Follow this blog:
RSS

Department of Defense demands WikiLeaks return leaked Afghan war logs

By | August 6, 2010, 12:35 AM PDT

In the Pentagon’s daily press briefing yesterday, spokesman Geoff Morrell led off with “The Defense Department demands that WikiLeaks return immediately to the U.S. government all versions of documents obtained directly or indirectly from the Department of Defense databases or records.”

Morrell is, of course, referring to the latest bomb (of several recent bombs) set off by WikiLeaks last month in which some 75,000 mostly-classified documents were published in an orchestrated expose from not only WikiLeaks but three major international news organizations (the New York Times, The Guardian UK, and Germany’s Der Spiegel). The Pentagon has been very consistent in its anger and incredulity towards WikiLeaks, a tone continued by the morning’s briefing.

The Pentagon also continued its characterization of the leaks as a threat to security both at home and abroad, but the call for the documents to be “returned” is a decidedly odd thing to request. The total statement also demanded that WikiLeaks remove the documents from its site, and cease solicitation of more classified defense documents.

It’s not clear what the Pentagon’s real goal is here. The damage has surely been done; the leaked war logs dominate the news landscape for weeks, and that information will remain on the Internet in some form (summarized, reported, analyzed) even if the original documents are removed.

And, of course, there’s no way WikiLeaks is actually going to relent. WikiLeaks sneeringly referred to Morrell as “obnoxious” and used the opportunity to, as Wired notes, ask for even more money. This sort of publicity will only help WikiLeaks’s cause–there are legitimate concerns to be had with the methods used by the site, but an attack from the Department of Defense is only going to strengthen its resolve.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dan Nosowitz

About Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowtiz was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet in 2010.

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz

Contributing Editor, Technology

Dan Nosowitz has written for Popular Science, Fast Company and Gizmodo. He holds a degree from McGill University in Canada. He is based in New York.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
You forgot the threat
There was also a threat in the government's statement, saying if
Wikileaks did not do "the right thing" the government would take
steps against Wikileaks. (And it was made the same day the
Department of Justice charged fund raisers from a Somalia charity
with being "terrorists." Coincidence?)

In all it was about as elegant an imitation of a mafia don as I've seen
this Administration engage in.
Posted by DanaBlankenhorn
6th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
War is a dirty business....
The Americans realize from the Vietnam conflict that unrestricted freely reported news about combat operations can damage support for the war at home so they are just COVERING UP and FILTERING the news to prevent the American people from seeing just what kind of carnage, death and destruction their warrior heros are really causing to the impoverished Afghan people.
Posted by anthonymaw
6th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Department of Defense demands WikiLeaks return leaked Afghan war logs
I am confident that Wikileaks & most of it's supporters are idealistic & motivated by altruism. At the same time, I believe that they are ignorant of the nature of 4th generation warfare & their own role in the Afghan conflict. In short, the battlefield is not only in Afghanistan (and parts of Pakistan) but also in public opinion. A public (in the Western democracies) that is largely ignorant of nature of war in general & is unlikely to have a direct connection to their citizens who are in the line of fire. Vietnam is an excellent example. The NVA & VC were unable to win on the battlefield but were able to win in the minds of the American public.
Posted by hoodedswan
6th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Department of Defense demands WikiLeaks return leaked Afghan war logs
If we find that wikileaks or Assange are attacked somehow then WE should be afraid. It will be proof that we have lost our government. Lost to special interests who are more concerned with their agenda than our nations ideals. I served in the army to protect what America stands for, not for the Dems., the Reps., or some network. We have a tradition of truth to be proud of, when we have stumbled before we picked and carried on, let's do so again. America needed to hear the truth not filtered pap designed to lull us.
Posted by garyfizer@...
8th Aug 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.