Follow this blog:
RSS

Darpa’s synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields

By | July 9, 2010, 10:01 AM PDT

Back in 2008, Darpa launched the Blood Pharming program. Pharming is the name for a genetically altered plant or animal that can produce an excess of some valuable property, like insulin or cheap vaccines.

The Blood Pharming project was, obviously, created to pharm blood, especially in military medical situations. Darpa contracted a Cleveland biotech firm called Arteriocyte for a mere $1.95 million for the project, and Arteriocyte now has a prototype that’s ready to ship off to the Food and Drug Administration for testing. Says Wired:

The blood was produced using hematopoietic cells, derived from embryonic cord-blood units. Currently, it takes Arteriocyte scientists three days to turn a single umbilical cord unit into 20 units of RBC-packed blood. The average soldier needs six units during trauma treatment.

One unit of pharmed blood currently costs about $5,000–Darpa estimates that that price will have to sink to about $1,000 before it’s financially viable, but one it gets FDA approval, there should be little problem to ramp up production and lower the price.

There’s another wrinkle that makes pharmed blood desirable: time. Most blood used in military medical situations is donated on physical U.S. soil, often very far from the action, as in our current major military efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. While the actual shelf life of blood is disputed (some say two weeks, some say four weeks, some say six), blood usually takes around 21 days to reach its intended host. By that time it is, if not actually expired, certainly “stale,” as Arteriocyte’s CEO puts it.

But pharmed blood can be produced on-site in much greater quantities, rather than having to be shipped from the States. That could be a huge advantage for this somewhat-artificial blood.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dan Nosowitz

About Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowtiz was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet in 2010.

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz

Contributing Editor, Technology

Dan Nosowitz has written for Popular Science, Fast Company and Gizmodo. He holds a degree from McGill University in Canada. He is based in New York.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
21
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Has anyone ever bothered to question just what's in or different about this "artificial" blood we're about to start putting into our bodies? Nanotechnology, anyone?
Posted by Nothing4Names@...
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Has anyone ever bothered to question what's in this "artificial" "blood" that we're about to start putting into soldiers bodies; OUR bodies??
Posted by Nothing4Names@...
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
@Nothing4Names - It sounds like it's just blood. They are using artificial techniques to stimulate the umbilical cords to produce more of it, that's all.
Posted by jeff.redding@...
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Good article. Can you put in links to the manufacurer on this and future articles.

Thanks,

David
Posted by dd2iamiam@...
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Good article. Also would like to know/read more on the manufacturer, process, and the like.

David Shepherd
Posted by DavidShepherd
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Does that mean "Blood Donation" is no longer needed?
Posted by whatisnew
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
I recently read a book about DARPA, which described how this unique government agency was instrumental in creating all kinds of cutting edge technologies, including ARPANET (later the internet as we now know it), battlefield robots (DARPA sponsored the urban challenge, to see who could create the best autonomous robot), and artificial limbs. So I'm not surprized they developed a blood substitute.

Long may DARPA continue to innovate and create!
Posted by AlexKovnat
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
When you are dying you never even ask about nanotech or anything else. All they ever say is, "Help me please."

This is a much cleaner way to get oxygen to your tissues than human blood. Blood is so nasty and the older the donor the nastier the blood, thru no fault of the donor. It is just a fact of living a long time and fighting multiple microbes thruout your life. Trust me, this is a good thing.
Posted by IMWeira
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
It's about time! The stagnation in technology these days is pitiful
and embarrassing. You'd think there'd be even more
advancements than this by now! Get moving industry! wink
Posted by eclipx
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Alert the editing Nazis: It's ""DARPA", not "Darpa". Acronyms are capitalized, and stands for "Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency".

Somehow I imagine this messing with nature all going horribly wrong down the line.
Posted by ejhonda
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
What are the "specs"?
What about blood type, antigens, etc?
Are they manufacturing universal donor type blood?
Is this related to the artificial red blood cells that have been around for a while?
Posted by FiOS-Dave
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
And Obama Care is going to pony up $5000 per unit of blood for our troops. Yea, right. The President wanted our troops to go out and get private insurance because they were volunteers. I guess those in Congress will be able to afford the new wonder blood!
Posted by shlloyd@...
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Reminds me of the character "Bishop" the "artificial person" with the white blood in the second movie, "Aliens".
Posted by JTF243@...
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
IMWeira,
Your news about blood from older donors being "nastier" is interesting.
I have not heard that before.
You appear not to like blood to save lives, but there is nothing yet available to replace it .

I was a donor from 1963 to 2005,
I was then 75 ans became too old then.

Hopefully I helped to save a few lives.
Posted by elderlybloke
12th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Why is the word "embryonic" crossed out?
Posted by Neeva
13th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
the term synthetic seems to be somewhat of a misnomer in this article. synthesis implies that they are bringing materials together to create a new product, when what they are doing is using the body's blood-producing cells to do it for them in a controlled and more efficient manner.
kw
Posted by diligente
13th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
All companies should work closer with government. Certainly when something goes bad government isn't going to pay any restitution.
Posted by dend
13th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Instead of more efficient ways to make blood, let's find more
efficient ways to make peace. Is there sufficient profit in Peace to
motivate business people to support it?
Posted by Meryl333
13th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Darpa's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Another thing for the military to do in remote locations, make blood, In addition to building nations, suppressing bribery (except what's necessary), supplying a group of men (and girls) with the technology they're trained to use (sometimes on the job), supplying the same group with food, clothing, and shelter and transportation and bullets, .......... Their big budget is appropriate, and considering the madness in the world, likely to increase. Pay your taxes, pay your taxes, hunt down and slay the tax evaders who cruise the warm seas on their yachts. Those taxes might also be useful for the everyday world's improvement.
Posted by rhum@...
14th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DARPA's synthetic blood almost ready for the battlefields
Meryl333, even if there were an instant eradication of war, crime, and plague, there would still be a need for artificial blood. As a donor that has given gallons over the years I can attest to the safety of the blood in the American system. Even a false positive -- a positive result for some disqualifying disease like hepatitis or HIV which is shown by confirmatory testing to be a mistake -- the donor is rejected forever after. There are times when we are doing surgery or in the E.D. that we need blood for some rare or difficult to match blood type. You cannot get enough blood of the right type when you need it, that person dies.

Also, age by itself is not what makes the blood "nastier", as another commentator stated. Age is used as a subjective means to reduce patient-related side effects. We also have a minimum age level for donors. By that commentators line of reasoning a blood donation from a 1 day old child would be like milking gold.

Blood loses its effectiveness over time. That is true. Blood -- actually we infuse the red blood cells in a transfusion (what we call Packed Red Blood Cells or PRBCs) -- that is 14 days old is more effective at O2/CO2 transport than blood that is 28 days old. There are always trade offs in everything in life.
Posted by jmp_omaha@...
15th Jul 2010
0 Votes
+ -
True Blood
Vampire Bill would like a bottle of O negative, please.
Posted by bonejar
17th Jul 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!