Follow this blog:
RSS

China’s stealth fighter gets lethal re-design

By | May 17, 2012, 5:20 AM PDT

Recently published photographs have revealed that China has begun testing a new version of their J-20 stealth fighter.

The latest prototype, assigned as number 2002, was spotted at a research facility in the city of Chengdu. Compared to the original 2001 model, the redesigned stealth jet features some slight, but notable modifications. Beyond this, not much is known about China’s stealth program and there’s still debate over whether such accelerated developments present any sort of credible threat to the F-22, America’s supreme stealth fighter.

It was only a little over a year ago that the first photos and a video of China’s rumored J-20 stealth fighter surfaced on numerous web sites and blogs. Not too long after, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that Chinese president Hu Jintao openly acknowledged to him to that the Chinese military had indeed just completed a 15-minute test flight. At the time, General He Weirong of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force said that serviceable fleet may be ready as early as 2017.

Since then, there’s been periodic sightings of the mysterious Mighty Dragon. Back in March, published snapshots showed the aircraft performing aerial maneuvers over an unspecified region of China’s airspace. Business Insider reports that “the prototype is said to be using the Saturn AL-31 turbofan engine developed by the Russians for their Su-27 air superiority fighter.”

Even with financial problems and a manufacturing strike jeopardizing future production of the F-22, some American industry experts don’t see China’s progress as anything worth losing any sleep over. “I’m not sure that its even much of an impressive airframe,” aviation analyst Richard Aboulafia of the Teal Group told The Daily Telegraph. “It looks like something that might have been designed in 1985.”

But comparing the J-20 capabilities head to head with the F-22 as a way to gauge threat level may be a flawed approach. Lower production costs may enable China to bolster the size of their fleet to the point where outnumbering the opposition is all it would take to win in aerial combat situations. And according to Wired’s David Axe:

Mighty Dragon 2002 does appear to be a step towards an early combat capability. It features several apparent improvements over its sister Mighty Dragon 2001, including stockier landing gear and a redesigned nose that could house an ultra-modern electronically scanned radar. If Beijing chooses to build a squadron of J-20s for early front-line use, they could look a lot like jet number 2002.

He also adds that it’s likely that China’s approach won’t involve undergoing a prolonged testing period as is typical with U.S. military defense technologies. Instead, it’s possible that they’ll just fast-track the process to put sufficiently operable models into service. In the meantime, any necessary improvements will simply be implemented into the second generation.

Simply put, we might be seeing a combat-ready J-20 fighter sooner than anyone would have expected.

(via Wired)

Learn about stealth aircraft on SmartPlanet:

The latest military weapons:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tuan C. Nguyen

About Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Contributing Editor

Tuan C. Nguyen is a freelance science journalist based in New York City. He has written for the U.S. News and World Report, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, AOL, Yahoo! News and LiveScience. Formerly, he was reporter and producer for the technology section of ABCNews.com. He holds degrees from the University of California Los Angeles and the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+4 Votes
+ -
Once again...
...Americans subsidize an opponents R&D. I wonder if they copied the F-22's Oxygen system as well. I hope so.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
17th May 2012
+6 Votes
+ -
Is It Time For An American Weapons Audit?
It might not be a bad idea to conduct an audit of American weaponry to determine how many components used in its electronics are manufactured in China. If there is a disruption in the supply chain are there any American sources that could pick up the slack in the event of war?
Posted by ddcmall
17th May 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
The U.S. Plans for the Previous War
Most of our defense dollars are today being committed to fighting asymmetric warfare, i.e. war against loosely organized, non-state entities like Al-Qaeda.

We are largely ignoring the investments required to maintain superiority in conventional warfare. Meanwhile, China takes the opposite approach, and no one seems nervous. Hmm.

People need to remember that China's vital interests and political value remain at odds with our own. Sooner or later, it's possible that China will provoke Australia, Taiwan, or Japan in a way that's intolerable, and we'll find ourselves in a conventional shooting war. Only probably is, the way things are going, we'll be prepared for the wrong war.
Posted by tthor
18th May 2012
-1 Votes
+ -
Chinese J20 cannot compete with F35
Even though Chinese was the first one invented the stealth material, they do not know how to apply it to the airplane. As far as the info goes, they still use the very old engine, which cannot provide enough power for the jet. Now with the redesign of airframe, this implies that they have more trouble than our F35 program. I bet the upgraded F15 can easily shoot it down.
Posted by chinmanwong@...
Updated - 18th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
tthor
I couldn't agree more.
Posted by Rovanton
21st May 2012
-1 Votes
+ -
Drones, anyone?
It seems to me that the Allies had air superiority at the end of WWII, but Britain suffered bombardment from the V-1 and V-2 unmanned bombs. Why build or worry about manned fighter planes, when drones are so much more expendable?
Posted by SmartAlbert
18th May 2012
+3 Votes
+ -
As seen in Iran.
Drones are vulnerable to jamming. They will have a large part in future air combat, but will never fully replace manned aircraft.

This is related to why the Air Force is going back to inertial guidance systems to replace GPS on future generations of JDAMs, cruise missiles and other GPS guided munitions.

Our foes have figured out how to jam our GPS targeting and drone communications.
Posted by Hates Idiots
18th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Vocabulary
I love the "lethal redesign" -- would anybody use that to cover an upgrade to the F-22, like the oxygen supply?

And there's lovely alliteration from "mysterious" to "Mighty Dragon".

And there's a lovely allusion in "low production costs", suggesting China could turn out hundreds in a surprisingly short time, as if cost were the only thing capping aircraft production, but yep, the engine sure is Russian: Chinese engine technology.
Posted by arthurborges@...
22nd May 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
F22 Long Gone
I'm sorry, "there???s still debate over whether such accelerated developments present any sort of credible threat to the F-22, America???s supreme stealth fighter"...? There is no debate of the J-20's threat to the F-22 because the F22 program was cancelled in 2010 by Mr. Obama and Mr. Gates. Only 195 F-22's were produced during it's life cycle. I'd hardly call that "America's supreme stealth fighter" with those kind of numbers. The only "threat" to the F-22 is that the J-20 looks like a ripped off the design.

Without getting too much into the politics, Gates, Obama, and others decided to cancel F-22 production in favor of the F-35 and F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet programs due to their multirole capabilities and because the F35 is also a stealth fighter. Currently, there are about 500 F/A -18 Super Hornets (as of April 2011), and 63 F-35's since it's introduction in 2011.

So let's compare the J-20 to the F-35, instead, since that's a more realistic scenario.
Posted by dporton
24th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
They'll catch-up
If we continue to divulge our technology secrets and play nice with them while they stab us in the back. The F-22 has issues with G forces and oxygen but the F-35 has more issues and won't be a stable plane for some time. It would behouve our defense secretary to get these things ironed out soon and not let some other countries pass us up. Russia is also gearing their military up.
Posted by pizzaman7
12th Jun 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!