Follow this blog:
RSS

Air Force solicits drones that can sense the intent of other aircraft

By | July 23, 2010, 3:53 PM PDT

Unmanned drones are risky business. As Wired notes, flying in the States, and particularly landing, is an extremely complicated process: Air Traffic Control is responsible for coordinating with airborne planes to negotiate landing patterns. If a landing strip is too busy, planes may have to circle while they wait, but that requires more coordination so the waiting planes don’t smash into each other.

That kind of information processing is no trouble for a trained pilot, but unmanned drones can’t reliably be trusted to react properly.

But drones also have their benefits: If that problem can be addressed, industries like shipping would be able to use a fleet of cheap, unmanned drones that follow a manned aircraft. FedEx, for example, is working on just such a fleet.

So it’s no surprise that the Air Force Research Laboratory at the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, just northeast of Dayton, Ohio, announced it will be looking for new ways to get unmanned drones up to speed. The submissions are to be algorithm-based; the Air Force hopes a well-designed algorithm, linked to the Air Traffic Control center, would be able to process more intricate information than current unmanned drones can handle.

These algorithms would allow a drone to recognize the “intent” of other aircraft, referring to its intended path and not just how it appears at the moment. Wired gives this example:

For instance: aircraft landing on parallel runways can appear to be on a collision course before they turn and land. Right now, a drone would simply perceive that a plane’s trajectory is going to remain unchanged, making it a threat for collision. But a capable algorithm would let the drone process Air Traffic Control information like basic airfield maps to know that there’s no actual danger from the oncoming piloted plane.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Dan Nosowitz

About Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowtiz was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet in 2010.

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz

Contributing Editor, Technology

Dan Nosowitz has written for Popular Science, Fast Company and Gizmodo. He holds a degree from McGill University in Canada. He is based in New York.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Air Force solicits drones that can sense the intent of other aircraft
Did they not see the terminator movies and the beginnings of skynet? Here we go with paranoid consiracy theories...
Posted by jcramner@...
26th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Air Force solicits drones that can sense the intent of other aircraft
Rescue choppers need to be smarter. I was there when Nicole
Suriel died. Police safety during rescues is a must.

http://open.salon.com/blog/onebyland/2010/07/25/hovering_cho
ppers_vultures_and_safety_on_the_beach

Please comment on this blog and offer your advice and help to
our community.
Posted by onebyland
26th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Air Force solicits drones that can sense the intent of other aircraft
uh, guys. Don't want to be a wet blanket, but have any of you had any experience with real life control systems?

I'm retired, I don't fly any more, and I live far enough from an airport that this isn't too big a worry, but it does promise to have its entertaining moments.
Posted by Just Watching Now
27th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Even human pilots can't sense the intent of other aircraft!
In a perfect world, everything would be orderly. We don't live in a perfect world. The software would have to maintain sufficient separation and airspeed so that the drones themselves don't trigger the entropy a single emergency-type situation would produce.

Example from my student flight training days: I once accidentally flew a correct landing pattern and landed on the runway in the wrong direction. It is likely that a drone given that situation would have misread my downwind pattern as simply a go-around and I would have ended up nose-to-nose in an unpleasant encounter shortly thereafter.

The drones would have to deal with the unpredictability of human behavior. It's a complicated subject even for our human brains. Whoever tries to tackle this is up for an enormous challenge. I'd be happy to contribute my opinions, but I'm not sharing the sky with one of those things during research!
Posted by Get-Smart
27th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Air Force solicits drones that can sense the intent of other aircraft
Not sure the author did much research on this story, all of the
drones I'm aware of including the Predator that is pictured here are
flown by pilots remotely. Sure there are lots of automated systems,
but the pilot (sitting his/her cube a world away) would hear ATC and
would react accordingly.
Posted by troyholl99
27th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
It's a Good Idea and ...
... a good long term project.

airlines have autopilots that can fly the planes. In some conditions they can land the planes more accurately than a human pilot. they don't handle unexpected conditions, or congestion well. But, computers are getting more capable. It's really just a question of more memory and better algorithms.

After all, if a pigeon can do it...
Posted by YetAnotherBob
2nd Aug 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!