Follow this blog:
RSS

787 clears initial airworthiness

By | January 16, 2010, 8:37 AM PST

Boeing said yesterday the Boeing 787 Dreamliner has passed initial airworthiness tests, thus clearing the way for others to fly in plane besides two test pilots.

“The airplane has been performing as we expected,” said Boeing vp and gm of the 787 program Scott Fancher. That means technicians, engineers and others relevant to the ongoing test flight program can fly in the plane. Also, other 787s presumably besides the first two ZA001 and ZA002 can be flown now. Six planes are part of the test program.

Another 787 shot from a chase plane. credit: Randy's Journal

Another 787 shot from a chase plane. credit: Randy

“Since the first flight in mid-December, the program has conducted 15 flights, achieving several key accomplishments. Pilots have taken the airplane to an altitude of 30,000 feet (9,144 meters) and a speed of Mach 0.65. Nearly 60 hours of flying have been completed. Initial stall tests and other dynamic maneuvers have been run, as well as an extensive check-out of the airplane’s systems. Six different pilots have been behind the controls of the 787,” according to Boeing’s press release.

The only problem Boeing has confirmed was debris in the fuel filter of ZA002 (the second 787 test plane) which was scheduled to fly yesterday from Boeing Field in Seattle back to Boeing’s massive Everett, Wash. plant for a fuel tank cleaning, according to FlightBlogger.  Cheese cloth debris was found in the plane’s fuel filter.

Now, Boeing will take the 787 up to 40,000 feet and speeds of Mach 0.85. Testing the plane beyond its typical operating conditions will also begin.

Flight testing will continue to the end of this year when the first 787 is expected to enter service on All Nippon Airways.

Boeing has about 840 orders for the 787 Dreamliner, which first in flew for the first time on Dec. 15. The 787 is Boeing’s newest commercial jetliner since the 777, which rolled out in 1994.

Follow me on twitter.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

John Dodge

About John Dodge

John Dodge was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2009 to 2010.

John Dodge

John Dodge

Contributing Editor, Technology

John Dodge has written for the Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, PC Week (now eWeek), EDN, Design News, Electronic Business, Bio-IT World, Health-IT World, Lowell Sun, Haverhill Gazette and Newburyport Daily News. He is based in Massachusetts.

Follow him on Twitter.

John Dodge

John Dodge

John Dodge prides himself on completely independent journalism. His opinions, observations and reporting are not influenced by any financial holdings. He holds no shares in computer, electronics, software or Internet companies. He also has no business affiliations with organizations except with those for which he creates content as a freelancer.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 787 clears initial airworthiness
Not that I have any issue with the 787, but why the big deal? How about spending more time on other Technical issues, like Renewable Energy.
Posted by jim@...
18th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 787 clears initial airworthiness
I've written a lot about the smart grid, smart meters and wind
power..search for yourself and you'll see the posts. There's lots of
interest in the 787 because it's 50% plastic, more than 15 per cent
fuel efficient than a similarly-sized plane and is manufactured in an
innovative way.

But in any event, I hear you...the 787 has fascinated me and I've been
writing heavily about it for almost three years....
Posted by John Dodge
18th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 787 clears initial airworthiness
As a retired avionics engineer, I'm very interested in what's new in aircraft. Keep telling us about it. Love that stuff.
Posted by ITOdeed
19th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 787 clears initial airworthiness
What worries me about the 787 is, if there is one error among millions of lines of code in the plane's computer systems, that error could lie in wait like a coiled snake waiting for the right combination of circumstances to strike (Those words are from a letter written to the editor of Flying magazine and published a few months ago).

Years ago, it used to be said that when a new airliner was introduced into service, you could expect three fatal crashes while the technical bugs were being worked out. But nowadays, if the 787 crashes even once you can be sure the news media will suggest killing the whole project, and settling for what we have with the 777.

I would recommend continued review of all 787-related computer programs and continued design reviews, even after the plane enters service. Given how tech-savvy some 12 year olds can be, I suggest a group of high-IQ 11 to 13 year olds be convened to study all computer coding used in the 787. Maybe they can find errors that adults might miss.
Posted by AlexKovnat
19th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 787 clears initial airworthiness
I'm not so much worried about coding as I am about fly-by-wire technology. This is okay for fighter jets since the pilot can punch out in case the "wire" breaks. But 200+ passengers? It seems that passengers are expendable for the advancement of technology.
Posted by ITOdeed
19th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 787 clears initial airworthiness
@Try2Ketchup: The letter written to the editor of Flying magazine that I mentioned above, was in fact an argument against fly-by-wire.
Posted by AlexKovnat
19th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 787 clears initial airworthiness
re. AlexKovnat

>> What worries me about the 787 is, if there is >> one error among millions of lines of code in
>> the plane's computer systems,

This has reared its ugly head with some Airbus planes. For example there is a video showing an Aibus plane climbing at a steep angle, approaching a stall, while the pilots were trying to force the nose back to LEVEL. The code in the plane seemed to have lost its sense of pitch decided that the pilots were trying to drop the nose too low (crash) and was fighting them for control. It took several minutes of effort but the pilots finally got control from the computer and brought the nose down to level flight. The bigger problem was that this occured at only a few thousand feet so the pilots had very little room to recover the bird.

There was also the Airbus incident at Toulouse, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7098547.stm when silencing the ground proximity alarm caused the brakes to automatically release while sitting on the ground with all engines at full throttle.

I don't know who writes their code but maybe it would be safer to teach pilots to write code. Maybe the propeller heads are knowledgeable but there have been too many cases of the computer (aka coder) over riding the pilot. Pilots aren't perfect but maybe they need a BIG RED button that you can hit to stop the computer from over riding a pilots decisions in an emergency.

A bad line of code is one thing but what about the deliberate attempt to religate pilots to nothing more than monkeys who push a button. I'm all for making the flight more economical in terms of fuel management, cost to run, etc. but not at the cost of lives or laundry bills after you scare the crap out of the passengers.
Posted by dave@...
20th Jan 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: 787 clears initial airworthiness
It's interesting just how often the "millions of lines of code" topic comes up. You need to keep in mind that only a tiny fraction of that code has anything to do with actual control of the airplane. One system that I have personal knowledge of has roughly 500,000 lines of code; yet when I eventually am riding in the airplane I'll have more fear of hardware issues like the power supply shorting out than the implications of a hidden defect in the software.
Posted by crudoliffic
31st Jan 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!