Follow this blog:
RSS

Why you should have bought Apple stock, not products, seven years ago

By | April 27, 2010, 6:57 AM PDT

What if, in 2001, you had saved the money you spent on a brand new $3,499 Apple Power Macintosh G4 733 and instead invested in stock for its Cupertino, Calif.-based maker?

Engineer and University of California Berkeley student Kyle Conroy set out to answer that very question.

Using prices from EveryMac, Conroy assembled a complete list of every Apple product, along with purchase price and corresponding share value.

With Apple’s stock at an all time high, the possibilities were tantalizing.

“A share today is worth over 40 times its value seven years ago,” Conroy writes.

So how much would you have today if you purchased stock instead of an Apple product?

Here’s a peek at a few popular choices:

  • 2006 15-inch Apple MacBook Pro “Core Duo” 2.16 GHz:
    $2,799 retail; $11,207 stock value today
  • 1998 Apple iMac G3/233:
    $1,299 retail; $46,413 stock value today
  • 1997 Apple PowerBook G3 250:
    $5,700 retail; $330,563 stock value today

The answer to the question at the beginning of this post, by the way? You would be sitting on a cool $110,190.

Check out the exhaustive list on his personal website.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
$15 back in '98 now worth 1067.20 in Apple stock
I'm a happy stockholder. A single share worth $15 then has
multiplied into 4 shares worth over $266 each. That means
10 shares then is worth $10,000 today and a hundred
shares worth over 100,000 today. Who wouldn't be happy?
Posted by Vulpinemac
27th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why you should have bought Apple stock, not products, seven years ago
That's a bit stupid. Anyone with a little grasp of economics
knows there is an opportunity cost associated with anything.
And anyone who KNEW in 1998 what would happen over the
next 12 years would have already made their fortune predicting
lottery winners or something. The reason Apple stock was
periodically VERY cheap was because their continued
existence was in doubt. Suppose you used the money you
would have invested in Enron to buy an iMac G3 in 1998? The
iMac would be worth more NOW than the Enron stock.
Personally, I've owned both the stock and the computers and
profited from both.
Posted by willhoyt
27th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why you should have bought Apple stock, not products, seven years ago
I bought both. No complaints..
Posted by jpdemers@...
27th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Better off with Microsoft Stock!
Why not compare that to MSFT bought 13 years ago?
My purchase back then has paid for my daughter's college education!
Posted by FiOS-Dave
27th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why you should have bought Apple stock, not products, seven years ago
Yep, and mi esposa told me I should've bought GOOG stock
way back when, too. But I'm stoopid. At least we picked up
a little AAPL before too long.
Posted by fjpoblam
28th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
What a bunch of crap.
What a useless article. You could write this about anything that's gone up.

What you should be doing is taking Apple to task for not paying dividends. Apple is a mature company on solid ground, not a start-up that's plowing every penny back into R&D or capital. This money makes huge profits every year, and that money belongs to the OWNERS of the company. Where is it? No one is arguing that Apple should deplete its cash reserves. But the reserves are big enough.

Jobs points to the stock price, making a rather juvenile excuse for the lack of dividends. It's a stupid strategy: To benefit from their ownership of Apple, people must cease to be owners. What kind of long-term strategy is that? It also reduces Apple from an investment to pure gambling.

I'm an owner of Apple. Where's my goddamned money?
Posted by dgurney
28th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why you should have bought Apple stock, not products, seven years ago
My money is in a safe place. I don't pay any taxes on it
because it isn't income until I sell my stock. You get
dividends, you pay taxes. Simple as that.

As I said, I'm a happy Apple stock holder.
Posted by Vulpinemac
28th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
please answer me
where i can sell one like this????
Posted by kevynav
10th Aug 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!