Follow this blog:
RSS

Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears

By | August 25, 2010, 6:55 AM PDT

Why do we cry?

After all, humans are the only species that does. (Despite the best intentions of the ASPCA and Sarah McLachlan, their popular TV commercial does not show dogs and cats in tears. It’d be impossible.)

But according to scientists who study evolution, crying has likely evolved to be a tool — a leg up in natural selection — to help the species persist.

For sure, tears themselves have a quotidian purpose: they keep our eyes lubricated. But scientists say tears — the streaming-down-your-cheek, no-no-I’m-fine ones — have evolved as a deceptive signal to other humans.

Deceptive, of course, because they immediately reveal our most intimate feelings to others nearby.

With consideration to evolution, that sounds a bit counter-intuitive: why would you want to reveal your vulnerability to another? But scientists say that communicative cue elicits similar feelings from others — whether happy or sad tears — and moves them to sympathize.

Scientists call it “theory of mind” — the unique human ability to attempt to understand the psychological reasons that are causing another person’s behavior. It’s present in adults, kids and babies alike.

In a great report, NPR elaborates (emphasis mine):

This power of empathy is huge, and it’s fundamental to pretty much everything we do, from forming close relationships to living in complex societies. [Belfast University Institute of Cognition and Culture director Jesse] Bering says those of our early ancestors who were most empathic probably thrived because it helped them build strong communities, which in turn gave them protection and support.

Within these communities, Bering says, tears could be powerful tools. They did more than just signal vulnerability — they were perhaps a way of keeping social and reproductive bonds strong. Maybe good criers were survivors.

“Crying seems to elicit compassion and guilt,” Bering says, “and that itself may be an evolved mechanism to save relationships in distress.”

Tearful crying: an emotional fast lane, effective where conversation may not be.

Fundamentally, crying is a way to get what you want — that’s why babies do it. (Sorry, mothers.) Or, that clever turn of phrase adults use: “The squeaky wheel gets the oil.”

It also gets the person protection. It’s easier to spare a teary-eyed person punishment.

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
The researc "reveals" nothing of the sort. One can surmise many reasons for tears and since there is no actual evidence for this claim (or mechanism as to how it developed or physical evidence of a transitional nature), it is nothing but, maybe, possibly or likely which when those terms are used, it means "we have no evidence but this is what we would like to present so we can get more funding."

Jim
Posted by JimRicker
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
Do you mean to say that these poor, pitiful women who've cried during some disagreement I've had with them did it for SELFISH reasons?

NO.

(I've never understood why these eggheads get the big bucks to do research that reveals what the rest of us have know since we were six years old.)
Posted by iouzero
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
Good one Jim! xD
Posted by ozl@...
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Just another way...
...for one human to manipulate another, whether it be intentional (read: fake) or not.

No surprise there.

It's problematic to tell a person who's bawling who you know is faking it to go take a hike, especially when there's other people around. It makes you into the villain, even if they know that person is faking it.

Of course it's a survival mechanism. Women have mastered it.
Posted by Zorched
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
That is so pathetic. Are Darwinists now that desperate?? A whole
theory built on "likely" and "maybe" and "probably"? Why not say
this is by design? or is it not "scientific"? wink
Posted by mjudi
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
mjudi has a very good point. Evolution is still a theory and one that
requires a lot of faith at that. More than believing in God. Its so
clear that we are fearfully and wonderfully made that you have to be
very well deceived to believe otherwise. So God put that tearing
mechanism into our bodies. And yes we can use them in sinful
ways.
Posted by rpmorrison
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
What about when someone cries when s/he is all alone? Sounds like these scientists are reaching....
Posted by johja
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
This assumes you believe in evolution which is the most unscientific theory ever to go untested. Order leads to disorder. While you may believe you granddaddy was an ape, I know better. :>)
Posted by TheAlembic
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Nature is so slick and smart...
Nature, through evolution, "saw" the need for tears and invented the mechanism through which we can, without words, let others around us know that we're feeling sad.

That same nature designed everything else around us, chaotically, including the most complex mechanism known in the universe, that being our brains. And, that thing we call DNA, as complex as it is, also happened by chance and through billions of chaotic actions and interactions and reactions.

That evolution/nature thing is so slick and so smart that it makes it virtually impossible to think that there could be something else as the "designer".
Posted by adornoe
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
Adornoe, I see you are a trinitarian. You believe in the holy trinity of Mother Nature, Father Time, and their great son Evolution. Others, however, claim that there is no god but Evolution and Darwin is his prophet.
Posted by bjswm@...
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
Yes, evolution is a theory, but creationism is a fairytale.
Posted by Dukhalion
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
Dukhalion is clearly so totally committed to his/her opinion that he/she has made no effort to learn anything at all about creationism. Otherwise it would be obvious that there are no fairies involved whatsoever. Creationism is, in fact, a Godtale.
Posted by bjswm@...
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
OH ho, A "avathar" of Sigmund Freud.
Posted by bijukn@...
25th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
bjswm@...Nope! Not a trinitarian, and not a biblical scholar either...
bjswm@...

My post above was meant as derision towards those that believe in evolution without regard to human nature or to the complete realities of what we have all around us.

Myself? Well...

I started out as a Roman Catholic in my youth, mostly because my whole family was Catholic and I was brought up in that environment. Then, as I grew older, and wiser (and so I thought), I began to doubt religion altogether and everything in the bible. To that new me, there was just so much in religion and in the bible that was just so much the stuff of fables. So, I became "agnostic". Then, with further understanding of the world around me, I became an atheist and for a long time, no one could convince me that there could be such a "thing" as a God. Evolution seemed to have all or most of the answers.

But, with greater wisdom and with more knowledge and better understanding, I began to realize that, even evolution didn't have the answers and that most of what evolution presented was simple conclusions based on observations. Observations are not the complete proof or the complete truth. Evolution has never produced real evidence that from one species we can derive a new species, with the new species exhibiting many of the same traits of the "parent" species, but very distinct traits/features of its own.

Evolution is nowhere even close to explaining the complexity of DNA or the complexity of differentiation or the complexity of some things we take for granted, such as, how did nature/evolution "decide" that, in order for a species to "survive", that species needed to have locomotion? Yeah, I know, evolutionists will point out that evolution just happened and chaotic and accidental events just created what we have now. But, what we have now is just too complicated for the simplicity of evolution. Even at the root level (the DNA), no evolutionist is able to explain how the complexity in it could've occurred by accident or chaotic events.

Therefore, though I'm not the best example of someone that believes in religion, I've come to be convinced that there is a lot more to our "nature" and our lives, and the whole environment around us, including the universe. I believe that what we are didn't "just happen". There is a lot of "intelligence involved" in the creation of life, especially when it comes to the most complex of species in the animal kingdom.

So, I've been around the loop from a "believer" to a doubter to "non-believer" to a "questioner" to now, somebody that believes in "intelligent design". My belief is that, nature and evolution, through chaotic and accidental events, cannot create something as complex as even the simplest of animal life, much less a human being.

If that intelligent designer is a "God", I'm not equipped to say. Though I don't belong to any "organized" religion, I don't discount the possibility of there being a "designer".
Posted by adornoe
26th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Why do I cry? Research reveals evolutionary advantage to tears
JimRicker, there?s plenty of evidence if you accept historical reports and statistical analysis. Yes, it is a theory, and at the moment, not scientifically verified. You have any idea how hard it is to develop an ethical, well-controlled, psychological experiment that uses people as test subjects to make such a scientific test?

Iouzero, that?s why the eggheads get the funding and you get squat. :-p By the way, while we may have ?known? this since we were 6, that doesn?t mean we?ve proven it.

Mjudi, ?likely?, ?maybe?, and ?probably? are all accepted, expected modifiers used to describe a statistical analysis of a condition; and are honest representations that there is a margin of error, inaccuracy, and variability of the observations. If I observe the flight of birds at this time of the year (late summer, early fall), it is ?likely? most will be headed in a southernly direction, ?maybe? the next one we see will also be headed south, and ?probably? the next flock we see will be too. Just because it?s hasn?t been scientifically tested doesn?t mean it?s not real.

The universe may very well be intelligently designed. However, the problem is the I.D. people think too small, too recent, and too ego-centrically; and they?re too self-righteously ignorant to even accept that evolution is part of the design.

The ?complexity? of the universe is an emergent condition that arises from the combinations of simplier parts. While most I.D. supporters still cling to the concept of irreduceable complexity; that concept has been thoroughly disproven, at least at a biological level. And most of those don?t know enough about the systems they claim to be irreduceable to have an intelligent informed opinion about in the first place. Think sub-atomic physics and cosmology and you?ll be a lot closer.

The theory of Evolution is the proposition that populations of organisms change through successive generations by means of the forces of variations in inherited traits (usually mutation) and selection (natural or otherwise). It's a good theory. It fits observations over millions of years and hundreds of thousands of generations, and it fits genetic observations.

And as far as TheAlembic is concerned, your ancestor, my ancestor, and that chimpaneze's ancestor WAS an ape. We can show you the genetic code of both, show you were the changes were made, and know how those changes are made every day when cells reproduce. That's enough evidence to convict and execute a murderer; it's enough evidence for any reasonable, intelligent person to accept as a proof of evolution.
Posted by Dr_Zinj
30th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
You have not "evolved", Dr Zinj, like I did.
While it's true that observations can tell you a lot, it's also true that the conclusions derived from those observations can be deceiving.

And as far as TheAlembic is concerned, your ancestor, my ancestor, and that chimpaneze's ancestor WAS an ape. We can show you the genetic code of both, show you were the changes were made, and know how those changes are made every day when cells reproduce. That's enough evidence to convict and execute a murderer; it's enough evidence for any reasonable, intelligent person to accept as a proof of evolution.

That last paragraph of yours is telling enough about how conclusions can be wrong when derived from simple, even if repetitive, observations.

Though we can observe that apes and humans are very close when it comes to our DNA, the conclusions don't have merit.

The observations made so far are basically superficial with no real findings of the "jump" from one species to another. We might be 98%-99% the DNA equivalent of chimps, but that 1 or 2 percent difference might be part of the design made by a "probable" designer.

With the theory of evolution being more than 150 years old already, there has never been any real and conclusive proof of any species becoming another species, even if the DNA is very close.

It's also very silly to compare how a murderer can get convicted on DNA evidence against the "proof" that still does not exist for a species making the "jump" to becoming something else. There are huge differences between "our ancestors" and what are actually human beings, even if the DNA is somewhere around 98% "the same".

Now, as a former believer in evolution myself, I can understand where you're coming from since I used to make the same arguments and believed like you do today. I don't discount the theory altogether, but I'm more inclined to believe that, like you mentioned, if the theory were to be in fact how nature performs, then it could be part of the plan of the "designer". But, for now, I'm more inclined towards a "designer" having done all the work, and what we are observing through "evolution" is the need seen by the designer for all the different species of animals and plants, even if many of them are so close to being identical.

The "forces of variation" that you mention have not shown any conclusive evidence that "that's how it works". The only "variations" observed with nature are the "changes" that are exhibited by a species for, as an example, adaptation. But, the DNA and the species are basically still 100% the same.

A designer is one who continues looking to "perfect" or change his work, and who doesn't necessarily start from scratch when "creating" something new. It's something like a programmer who uses a prior version of a software package and changes it to perform better or become something completely different (using objects to create something new); it's the theory of "use what you have and make it better". But, to "the designer", making something better or different has to play into the overall scheme of our world and universe.
Posted by adornoe
30th Aug 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!