Follow this blog:
RSS

Want to learn better? Crack open your laptop (and ditch the classroom)

By | August 20, 2009, 4:03 AM PDT

Want to learn better?

So do I. And according to a recent study for the Department of Education, it might be wise for both of us to boot up our computers.

Students who study online performed better than those receiving classroom instruction, according to a new survey for the Department of Education.

“On average, students in online learning conditions performed better than those receiving face-to-face instruction,” reads the 93-page report (.pdf) on online education, which was conducted by SRI International.

The report examined the comparative research on online versus traditional classroom teaching from 1996 to 2008, from K-12 to college to adult learning programs.

The analysis found that, on average, students doing some or all of the course online would rank in the 59th percentile, versus the average classroom student in the 50th percentile.

Or in other words: online learning isn’t just a makeshift education — it’s actually more effective.

Why? Perhaps it’s because online courses, now beyond their infancy, have the ability to be customized to the student’s learning level. Perhaps it’s also because of focus — with online courses, you must engage, and you can’t just sit back and let the lecture go in one ear and out the other.

For now, most online courses are in the continuing education sector. Many high school, undergraduate and graduate schools use online CMS systems to post assignments and syllabi, but those systems are for administrative reference, not learning.

With the growth of online learning — and the chance to “bathe in bits” — the lecture may soon be extinct.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Self-Selecting Participants
Why were those students online? Because they wanted to be? That would be a stronger argument for better engagement. Continuing education students are most likely adults taking courses they need and find relevant.

Customization is fine if you can finish the class whenever you want. But schools run on schedules. To pass the class, you need to get through every objective. If you spend twice as much time on one topic, you've now got less time to get through the others.
Posted by MichP
20th Aug 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Want to learn better? Crack open your laptop (and ditch the classroom)
SRI International is a world renowned research organization. If you are guessing that the main reason for the success of online learning is "self selection", I suspect you didn't read the research article. It cited a wide variety of research, including "experimental research". For research to be experimental means that the subjects were randomly assigned, not self-selected.

On the other hand, the results are not as strong for online learning as the author of the blog indicated. The headline is a bit overblown, since the conclusion was that online learning is only modestly better than classroom learning. And in fact, the best kind of learning was found to be "blended learning", meaning that the class is both in-person and online.

Online learning has the benefit of fitting around a schedule, while in-person . To find that a blend of these two is better than either alone implies that there may be some kind of synergetic relationship.

One clear thing that this research shows is that even by disseminating the research, the results aren't understood clearly. It seems that even the writer of the article wasn't clear on the results, which may be summarized as the following:

"In recent experimental and quasi-experimental studies contrasting blends of online and face-to-face instruction with conventional face-to-face classes, blended instruction has been more effective, providing a rationale for the effort required to design and implement blended approaches. Even when used by itself, online learning appears to offer a modest advantage over conventional classroom instruction." From page xvii, http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
Posted by ioot@...
21st Aug 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Want to learn better? Crack open your laptop (and ditch the classroom)
The second point I might mention is that the report found that there were just not enough studies for K-12 to do a meta-analysis. As a result, this report only covered college to adult learning. It didn't have much to say about kids and distance learning, probably because there's not much possibility of randomly assigning children to participate in online learning instead of going to school.
Posted by ioot@...
21st Aug 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet Community and join the conversation! Signing-up is free and quick, Do it now, we want to hear your opinion.