Follow this blog:
RSS

U.S. used less water in 2005 than in 1975, despite 30% more population

By | November 3, 2009, 7:37 AM PST

The United States is using less water now than during the peak years of 1975 and 1980, despite a 30 percent population increase during the same time period, according to a new U.S. Geological Survey report.

According to the report, Americans used 410 billion gallons per day in 2005, slightly less than in 2000. But it’s not all because we’re taking shorter showers: that number is the result of several factors, including public supply (water towers), domestic use (showers, faucets), irrigation, livestock, aquaculture, industrial use, mining, and thermoelectric power generation.

In fact, the 2005 numbers break down like this, according to the study:

  • Public supply: 11 percent
  • Domestic use: 1 percent
  • Irrigation: 31 percent
  • Livestock: less than 1 percent
  • Aquaculture: 2 percent
  • Industrial use: 4 percent
  • Mining: 1 percent
  • Thermoelectric power generation: 49 percent

As you can see, the lion’s share of water use comes from two places: irrigation and power generation. As such, the study attributes the decline since the 1970s to the increased use of more efficient irrigation systems and alternative technologies at power plants.

Meanwhile, water withdrawals for the public supply — water towers, etc. — have increased steadily since 1950 along with increases in population, which depends on those supplies.

In other words: though public-supply withdrawals have continued to increase overall, per capita use has decreased in many states since the 1970s.

Not surprisingly, the states with the most power generation and irrigation applications used the most fresh surface water: California, Texas, Idaho and Illinois. Similarly, the states with the most irrigation used the most fresh groundwater: California, Texas, Nebraska, Arkansas and Idaho.

Thankfully, the average amount of water withdrawn to produce a kilowatt-hour of electricity in the U.S. has decreased steadily from 1950 to 2005, owing to an increase in the number of power plants using alternatives to wasteful once-through cooling, which passes water through coolers a single time before discarding.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
bottled?
does the study take into account the increase in bottled water that we now consume? import?
Posted by clblfl@...
3rd Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
Bottled water consumption is insignificant...
...beyond the waste of the bottles. A single flush of the average
household toilet uses more water than most people drink in a day,
bottled or not.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
4th Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: U.S. used less water in 2005 than in 1975, despite 30% more population
This has alot more to do with no manufacturing jobs than it does with conservation and don't let an enviro whacko tell you any different!
Posted by partman1969@...
4th Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
Irrigation Has a Long Way to Go
They tell homeowners not to water during the heat of the day. Give the water a chance to soak in before it evaporates. But still I drive by fields spraying water from overhead onto crops in the middle of the day during the summer.
Posted by MichP
4th Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: U.S. used less water in 2005 than in 1975, despite 30% more population
Since irrigation sues such a large amount of water why not start there when it is overlooked? http://www.IrrigationThatMakesSense.org is a non profit group trying to battle our national water issues by providing funding and installation of green irrigation products. They have a irrigation product that conserves up to 80% of water use after two years. Their product is installed sub-surface therefore you never see it watering. It makes the plants stronger, uses less fertilizer along with water and no over spray onto sidewalks and roads. The cost to install their underground irrigation product is comparable to overhead sprinklers but this is the green irrigation choice.
Posted by allamerathlete@...
4th Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
As long as water remains subsidized for agriculture...
...like it is in California, there's little incentive for them to alter
their methods.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
4th Nov 2009
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: U.S. used less water in 2005 than in 1975, despite 30% more population
Who called me ? The information about unknown phone number to find out who owns that number and why they call. Who is calling me.
Posted by EdwardKresge
7th Jun 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!