Follow this blog:
RSS

U.S. Great Plains, Southwest at ‘extreme risk’ of water shortage, report says

By | July 29, 2010, 7:39 AM PDT

More than one-third of all counties in the continental United States face higher risks of water shortages by mid-century, according to a new report.

The reason? Global warming, according to the nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council.

According to the report (.pdf), 14 states face an “extreme or high risk to water sustainability,” with limitations on use expected as demand exceeds supply by 2050.

Those states:

  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Florida
  • Idaho
  • Kansas
  • Mississippi
  • Montana
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Mexico
  • Oklahoma
  • Texas

“The more than 400 counties identified as being at greatest risk in the report reflects a 14-times increase from previous estimates,” the NRDC said in a statement.

The findings — by consulting firm Tetra Tech for the NRDC — come from the combination of publicly available water-use data and climate projections based on models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC.

Specifically, researchers looked at water withdrawal data for different sectors of the economy, such as irrigation, cooling for power generation, and municipal supply, as well as estimated future demands using business-as-usual scenarios of growth.

Then they compared the future withdrawals to projected renewable water supply levels for 2050, based on a set of 16 global climate model projections of temperature and precipitation.

The NRDC made its data available and arranged it by state, so you can look up your area. That information can be found on the NRDC’s site and also on Tetra Tech’s site.

But the scope of impact goes beyond your ability to take a shower in the morning. In the 1,100 at-risk counties are crops worth more than $105 billion, posing a threat to the nation’s agricultural economy.

Here’s what NRDC Climate Center director Dan Lashof said, in a statement:

Water shortages can strangle economic development and agricultural production and affected communities. As a result, cities and states will bear real and significant costs if Congress fails to take the steps necessary to slow down and reverse the warming trend.

Water management and climate change adaptation plans will be essential to lessen the impacts, but they cannot be expected to counter the effects of a warming climate.

The only way to truly manage the risks exposed by this report is for Congress to pass meaningful legislation that cuts global warming pollution and allows the U.S. to exercise global leadership on the issue.

According to the report, water withdrawal will grow by 25 percent in many areas of the U.S., including obvious areas such as Arizona and New Mexico, but also the Deep South — Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, etc. — and as far north as the nation’s capital, Washington, D.C.

[via National Geographic]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Even low risk areas may be affected.
Here in Western Oregon which shows up as mostly low risk for water shortage the yearly pattern of the water supply is expected to change. In the Cascade Mountains less snow and more rain is expected in the winter which will move the runoff period to earlier in the year and significantly reduce the snow pack that sustains summer river levels reducing the water available for irrigation.
Posted by riverat1
29th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: U.S. Great Plains, Southwest at 'extreme risk' of water shortage, report says
This isn't exactly news. These states have been fighting over water since settlers first arrived. Just a few years ago, Kansas won a major water rights lawsuit against Colorado.
Posted by abear4562
29th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: U.S. Great Plains, Southwest at 'extreme risk' of water shortage, report says
These dire reports, while reflecting some truth in the causes, do not truly look at bigger solutions. In the spring time throughout the northern US we are seeing earlier melts and higher rain runoffs. This water goes into the drainage systems of streams and ultimately rivers and causes great flooding damage to surrounding cities and farms along those rivers. Then that water dissipates or continues into the ocean. This is good fresh water that is lost forever until the next winter aspiration cycle. While doing something about GW is good, we should also look at CAPTURING AND MOVING THIS WATER TO THE AFFECTED SOUTHWEST, SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST AREAS. Let's not continue to bail out businesses and banks WITH TAXPAYER MONEY but use the money to build large catchbasins and long water distribution systems that can mover this water before it does damge. We do it for oil, don't we? This is the same scale of project.
Posted by Omnius
29th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: U.S. Great Plains, Southwest at 'extreme risk' of water shortage, report says
one of the reasons nuclear power plants were to be built ws to supply potable water using the excess heat produced, but in the late 1940s and the 1950s, we did not need the water so that was scrapped. then the hystyerics over nuclear power caused few plants to be built. we can still recover and get the new plants to do double duty and rework the old plants with the u.s population in utter panic for whatever reason they can think of, this will never be done. sad sad isn't it?
Posted by stilt21
29th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: U.S. Great Plains, Southwest at 'extreme risk' of water shortage, report says
@stilt21, that's a new one on me, supplying potable water. The problem with what you are saying is that the nuclear plants need large amounts of water just for cooling. If there isn't enough water available in an area in the first place it doesn't help.
Posted by riverat1
29th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: U.S. Great Plains, Southwest at 'extreme risk' of water shortage, report says
Het heeft geen zin om dat aan dat fossiel wat haat met liefde verwart uit te leggen. Zijn haat jegens anders denkende zit hem dusdanig in de weg, dat hij niet anders kon dan bij de redactie zijn ban lijstje met reguurders in te leveren, om zo het enige wat nog zin heeft in zijn leven te kunnen blijven doen. Het lezen van Niburu zonder die vervelende mensen die steeds die roze luchtbel doorprikken. Want er is maar ??n waarheid en dat is natuurlijk die van Niburu *kuch* louis vuitton watches
Posted by hongjingjingxzb
29th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
No surprise..
This is what happens when millions of people move to the desert.

Southern California, Arizona and Nevada were mostly vacant for thousands of years because man was smart enough to know you cannot survive without food and water.

We built great dams and aqueducts and thought we had conquered nature. But Mother Nature always wins.

You can only adapt so much and support only so many people.

If you are running out of water the answer is simple. MOVE or die.
Posted by Hates Idiots
30th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: U.S. Great Plains, Southwest at 'extreme risk' of water shortage, report says
I saw a chart in the local offices of a major oil company here in West Texas which projects that the aquafir here in the Cap Rock region will be functionally depleted by 2050. My question is why is no one locally, generally aware of such projections. Oil field process water is big business here and at odds with agricultural sustainability at current usage rates. Yet I see no substantitive discussion about it.
Posted by theramess@...
31st Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Poor planning and ignoring nature.
How about we stop building cities in the middle of deserts? Las Vegas is in an arid basin. Phoenix and Tucson are built in the Sonoran Desert! What arrogance it is to assume that we can totally ignore nature. Even with the water supply dropping, the desert cities are continuing to grow.

Desalinisation may become an answer, but the cost of desalinising water is far above what Americans are accustomed to paying for water. Within the next 10 to 20 years, there will be a lot of very unhappy people in Arizona and New Mexico owning worthless land because there is no water available.
Posted by Shaun C
26th Jun
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!