Follow this blog:
RSS

Urban roads safer than rural ones, study says

By | January 28, 2011, 7:07 AM PST

Where you live greatly impacts the likelihood of getting into a fatal car collision.

According to a new study, the safest places to drive in the United States aren’t empty rural roads in America’s heartland — in fact, it’s Washington, D.C., Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut and Illinois.

The most dangerous? Wyoming, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Arkansas.

The study is based on federal data of traffic fatalities per 100,000 population and per 100 million miles driven.

The big lesson: urban roads are safer than rural ones, in some places by a factor of two.

The reason? Urban areas usually have roads with lower speed limits and safer roadway features (divided lanes, guardrails, fast access to emergency medical care, etc.)

Most rural fatalities happen not by colliding with another vehicle, but when the original car leaves the road and crashes into trees or other obstructions.

To be sure, the “safest” states are also some of the ones with the most fatalities overall. (And naturally, these statistics don’t take into consideration less-than-fatal collisions, which I’m willing to bet are much, much higher in dense areas.) But per capita, you’re more likely to die in a car crash in a rural area than in one in a city.

The results have been met with some degree of criticism.

USA Today reports:

Many traffic safety groups such as the Governors Highway Safety Association argue that such comparisons don’t accurately reflect how safe a state’s roads are. A better measure, they say, is whether states have enacted proven safety enhancements such as motorcycle helmet laws and primary seat belt laws, which allow police to stop motorists solely for being unbuckled.

Is the difference a matter of measurement, or an inevitable result of the way the world works? After all, we can’t have everyone going 25 miles per hour across the plains states.

Still, the study shows that the architects and engineers who design our roadways, and the elected officials who regulate them, play a large part in their inherent safety.

The rates of each state per 100,000 population, arranged from safest to most dangerous, below:

  • District of Columbia: 4.8
  • Massachusetts: 5.1
  • New York: 5.9
  • Connecticut: 6.3
  • New Jersey: 6.7
  • Illinois: 7.1
  • Washington: 7.4
  • Rhode Island: 7.9
  • Minnesota: 8.0
  • California: 8.3
  • New Hampshire: 8.3
  • Hawaii: 8.4
  • Ohio: 8.8
  • Utah: 8.8
  • Michigan: 8.7
  • Alaska: 9.2
  • Nevada: 9.2
  • Colorado: 9.3
  • Maryland: 9.6
  • Virginia: 9.6
  • Oregon: 9.8
  • Wisconsin: 9.9
  • Pennsylvania: 10.0
  • Indiana: 10.8
  • USA average: 11.0
  • Vermont: 11.9
  • Maine: 12.1
  • Arizona: 12.2
  • Iowa: 12.4
  • Nebraska: 12.4
  • Texas: 12.4
  • Delaware: 13.1
  • Georgia: 13.1
  • Kansas: 13.7
  • Florida: 13.8
  • North Carolina: 14.0
  • Idaho: 14.6
  • Missouri: 14.7
  • Tennessee: 15.7
  • South Dakota: 16.1
  • Alabama: 18.0
  • New Mexico: 18.0
  • Kentucky: 18.3
  • Louisiana: 18.3
  • South Carolina: 19.6
  • West Virginia: 19.6
  • Oklahoma: 20.0
  • Arkansas 20.3
  • North Dakota: 21.6
  • Montana: 22.7
  • Mississippi: 23.7
  • Wyoming: 24.6

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Urban roads safer than rural ones, study says
There could be other factors. For instance, people who drive in urban areas generally drive a lot more miles each year: They simply have more driving experience than rural drivers, and are better able to handle the driving task.

Although the example of single-car accidents refers to isolated roads, two-car accidents may be a factor as well: Freeways don't have intersections. Rural highways (either old U.S. highways or state highways) often have intersections where vehicles must pull into, rather than merge with, high speed traffic.

As the article mentions, safer roadway features must be a factor. In addition to the lack of a center divider, as you mentioned, and the fact of intersections, many rural highways have just two lanes, unimproved shoulders, and curves with limited sight-lines. That is simply the nature of rural areas: There's not much reason to build freeways everywhere.

People have thought me crazy for riding a motorcycle on Houston freeways, but I tell them it's a lot less scary than riding on the farm-to-market roads or on city streets, where there are potential collisions everywhere.
Posted by AlanLaRue
28th Jan 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Number of miles per year
AlanLaRue - Folks in rural areas drive far, far more miles than folks in urban areas. When you live 25 miles from the grocery store, 150 miles from the doctor's office, and 20-30 miles from church and the school - well, you drive a LOT more than folks in the city. One of the factors in the statistics should be based upon average number of miles driven per person per year.

I split my time evenly between a very rural area (5000 people in the county) and St. Louis city. The biggest differences I see that could explain the differential are:
* Number of safe roadway features (as you note above)
* Not only the speed limit being higher on the rural roads, but also folks simply drive faster overall
* The amount of wild & domestic animals that cross the road
* Lower light levels at night
* High likelihood of no cell service, so inability to call for help after an accident & low traffic volume, so you aren't found by someone
* Lower level of road service to keep roads clear after snow & ice storms
Posted by Coelura
28th Jan 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Quite the contrary
It's my experience is that it's urban folk who are the less-
experienced drivers. It's also not much of a mystery why rural
roads are more dangerous:

Higher speeds
Higher variability of road conditions
Likelihood of encounters with animals
Further from quick-response help in case of accidents
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
29th Jan 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!