![Russia's new stealth fighter to challenge for supremacy of the skies [video]](http://i2.zdnetstatic.com/blogs/thumbnail/_jkqSU.jpg)
It's not a free lunch!
I'm not a climatologist but think about it. You start putting ACRES of turbines and what happens to the wind. Sure it turns the turbine and generates power BUT it expends velocity doing so. Think of the potential climate changes that changing wind patterns could produce.
There is a serious 'Because This then That' syndrome potential here.
It would be nice to get a weather person to weigh in on this subject.
Scotty
A new report analyzing the potential of wind power in the United States has revealed the top 10 states for turbines. The good news: America has more potential than we first thought.
In a report by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Albany, N.Y.-based renewable energy consulting firm AWS Truewind, wind turbines in the continental U.S. could generate 37 PWh (petawatt-hours) per year — far more than the 3,816,000,000 MWh (or about 3.8 PWh) per year currently required to power the nation, as estimated in 2005.
The report also inspected how the 48 contiguous states stack up in wind power potential.
Here are the Top 10:
- Texas: 6,527,850 GWh/yr
- Kansas: 3,646,590
- Montana: 3,228,620
- Nebraska: 3,540,370
- South Dakota: 3,411,690
- North Dakota: 2,983,750
- Iowa: 2,026,340
- Wyoming: 1,944,340
- Oklahoma: 1,788,910
- New Mexico: 1,644,970
The worst states? Mississippi, Florida, Delaware, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Kentucky.
Still, the study found that the annual production of power from wind energy using turbines at a taller 80-meter height would be the energy equivalent of all proven oil and natural gas reserves in the U.S.
Not bad at all.
