Follow this blog:
RSS

Through data, evaluating the potential for life on other worlds

By | November 21, 2011, 7:09 AM PST

In many fields of science, the imagination is only limited by the language that can explain it.

As we discovered nearly a year ago, forms of life could exist that play by rules beyond our base of knowledge.

Scientists know that it’s likely that they will discover many more planets orbiting distant stars. They also know that researchers are most likely to focus on those that exhibit Earth-like conditions, in an attempt to find life in another part of the universe.

But what if alien life can exist in conditions drastically unlike those of Earth? Will scientists mistakenly overlook them?

Driven by this fear — and the admission that searching for Earth-like conditions as a precondition for life is a basic but incomplete strategy for finding it —  an international team of researchers from NASA, SETI and several universities are working to develop a classification system that includes chemical and physical parameters that are theoretically conducive to life, even if they result in decidedly un-Earth-like conditions.

Washington State University astrobiologist Dirk Schulze-Makuch, University of Puerto Rico modeling expert Abel Mendez and seven more colleagues have developed two different indices — an Earth Similarity Index that categorizes a planet’s more Earth-like features, and a Planetary Habitability Index that includes theoretical parameters — that they say can help researchers more easily find patterns in large and complex datasets.

It’s the first attempt by scientists to categorize the potential of exoplanets and exomoons to harbor life, and should prevent Earth-bound researchers from overlooking conditions that are, ahem, alien to them in their search for life.

Their work will be published in the December issue of the journal Astrobiology.

Illustration: NASA

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+3 Votes
+ -
DNA is a very agressive molecule
As far as we can understand, DNA is a digital program.

The program has a very strong survival directive

It adapts to an infinite variety of environments.

Defining what is life, will be an almost impossible task..

Here on our little planet relative to our own short life life spans,
we have life that lasts very long and slow as well as quick and fast and everything in between, All we can reasonabley say is that the probablilty of us being alone infinitely small.
Posted by TonyTrenton
22nd Nov 2011
+3 Votes
+ -
" and seven more colleagues"
In the authors opinion, are the seven colleagues less significant than the 2 mentioned?
Posted by 16Tons
22nd Nov 2011
+3 Votes
+ -
I agree with this approach to move away from human-/Earth-centricity...
..but it leads me to ask, what took so long?
Posted by kemcki00
22nd Nov 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!