Follow this blog:
RSS

The top firms that champion conflict-free supply chains

By | August 16, 2012, 12:16 PM PDT

Intel, HP, and Apple have received top marks for their efforts to eradicate conflict minerals from supply chains in a new report published by the Enough Project.

The anti-genocide nonprofit organization’s report, dubbed “Taking Conflict Out of Consumer Gadgets” (.pdf), researched how leading technology developers and manufacturers use “conflict minerals” in their supply chains since the last report was published in 2010. These types of minerals, including tantalum, tin, and tungsten, are often mined in places which are considered politically unstable, such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo — areas that may have civil war, corruption or human rights problems.

Unfortunately, they are also used in a wide variety of technological products.

Each firm was assessed on their efforts in eradicating such minerals from their product lines and supply chains. Intel, HP, Apple, and Motorola were called the “pioneers of progress” as they have created projects aimed at developing ‘clean’ mineral trades, surveying protocol and operating with “due diligence” to prevent unethical or corrupt trade.

Each company was ranked based on three main areas within achieving “conflict-free” supply chains — tracing, auditing and certification. Some critical points include:

  • Identifying and auditing smelters
  • Sourcing from certified, conflict-free mines that help local communities
  • Joining the Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade (PAA) which supports establishing conflict-free sources;
  • Preventing tin smuggling — prolific in countries including Rwanda;
  • Preventing rare-earth material black markets, with a particular emphasis on the gold trade.

According to the report, SanDisk, Philips, Sony, Panasonic, RIM, and AMD have made “initial steps” to prevent trade involved in conflict, whereas HTC, Sharp, Nikon, and Nintendo gained the lowest marks, having made “little or no progress” in recent years.

The full rankings are below.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Why are Apple and Motorola cited as pioneers?
According to the graphic AMD, Philllips, Sandisk, and RIM all score higher than Apple and Motorola and yet are described as having made "initial steps" compared to Apple and Motorola being lauded as pioneers. Even if you look at just progress since the last report, AMD went from 0 to 44% compared to Motorola who went from 0 to 35% and Sandisk went from 4 to 48% compared with Apple's progress from 13 to 38%.

Somebody's data and narrative don't agree ... is somebody perhaps pandering to the big names?
Posted by nicoleweaver
17th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!