Follow this blog:
RSS

The Morning Briefing: Curiosity’s mission

By | August 9, 2012, 2:08 AM PDT

“The Morning Briefing” is SmartPlanet’s daily roundup of must-reads from the web. This morning we’re reading about Curiosity’s mission.

1.) Curiosity’s perilous landing? ‘Cleaner than any of our tests‘. For a time, JPL scientists feared that the nickname for the Martian rover’s daring landing sequence — ’seven minutes of terror’ — was coming true. But then it was safe.

2.) Curiosity’s mission to Mars — The rover’s descent [video]

3.) Latest Curiosity images show rover’s mission on Mars. NASA’s Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity is on its second day on the Red Planet. Before serious exploration gets underway, the rover is going through a battery of tests to ensure all equipment is functioning properly.

4.) Curiosity rover drives $2.5B make-or-break Mars mission. The Mars Science Laboratory is the most expensive and complex lander ever sent to the red planet, a nuclear-powered rover that will scale a 3-mile-tall mountain to seek the building blocks of life.

5.) The Curiosity Landing Already Has a Meme: NASA’s ‘Mohawk Guy’. As millions tuned in to watch the livestream and the television coverage of tonight’s (successful) Curiosity landing, one Mission Control staffer stood out among the others: a dude with a mohawk. And not just any mohawk: an intricate red and black affair, with yellow stars dyed in the sides of the wearer’s head.

Image credit: NASA

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-1 Votes
+ -
Some Factual Errors about the Space Program
As 'remarkable' as landing on Mars was, it still does not take away from the fact of the HUGE amount of rocket pollution left behind as it went into space, and the risk of 10 lbs. of plutonium disbursement in a launch accident.

I see this landing on Mars as no triumph, but more like a casino roulette game that just so happen to be won.



So now, what will be the outcome? More of the same, with more rocket launches and funding for more nuclear-powered spacecraft. As long as humanity supports this kind of activity, a devistating radioactive fallout accident waiting to happen is no longer 'if', it is 'when'.



As amazing as this technology seems to be, it still is only a type of insanity to pursue such a course. Because NASA has its own agenda, which does not include taking care of the environment, that we all rely upon for our daily sustenance.

So I maintain my position that going to Mars to laser-beam some rocks is an extremely unconscious and self-serving act, on the part of certain people who have a complete disregard for preserving and caring for the fragile balance of life on THIS planet.

Just imagine what $2.5 billion (which is 2,500 MILLION dollars) would do to start cleaning up the environment!

What would you do if given one million dollars to make the world a better place to live in?

Now, multiply that by 2,500 people, who could be given one million dollars each to feed and clothe the hungry, house the homeless, clean up the pollution, and work toward restoring the Earth to its former beauty.

(continued at:)
http://darinselby.1hwy.com/4spaceprogramerrors.html
Posted by darinselby
9th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
NASA Once Again Rolling the Dice
Karl Grossman, professor of journalism at the State University of New York/College at Old Westbury, is author of "The Wrong Stuff: The Space Program's Nuclear Threat To Our Planet." writings back up what I've just posted. This rocketry space program stuff has MESMERIZED most people into believing that it is humanity's DESTINY to go into outer space.

Nothing could be farther from the truth.

We can learn how to exercise our ability to DISCERN whether an endeavor is a good one or not.

As the 'patternman' JESUS once said, "You cannot get good fruit from a poison tree", and also that "You shall know them by their fruits". 'Peacetime rocketry'? Not possible, for it was born out of a warmongering era, and STILL wages war on the environment every single time there is a launch into space. To me, that is a BIG red flag that continually gets brushed aside, as humanity falls under the SPELL that NASA is casting forth.

Here is Prof. Karl Grossman's article on this eye-opening background information:
http://www.spearboard.com/archive/index.php/t-24171.html

Here are some other pertinent articles to consider. I base all of my material upon facts and science.

The dangers of a plutonium 238 disbursement rocket launch accident:
http://www.spearboard.com/archive/index.php/t-24171.html

-also this article: http://www.nationofchange.org/nuclear-power-space-pushed-1343834133 which says:

"Dr. Arjun Makhijani, a nuclear physicist and president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, explains that Plutonium-238 is about 270 times more radioactive than Plutonium-239 per unit of weight. Thus in radioactivity, the 10.6 pounds of Plutonium-238 being used on Curiosity is the equivalent of 2,862 pounds of Plutonium-239. The atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki used 15 pounds of Plutonium-239. "

-which then links to an ENTIRE website dedicated to this crucial information: http://www.space4peace.org/

As far as what comes out the 'tail pipe' of a solid rocket fueled spacecraft, have you heard of a scientist named Helen Caldicott? Here's what she has to say about it: http://ringnebula.com/project-censored/1976-1992/1990/1990-story4.htm

I've read in chat rooms, etc. that people think it is mostly steam as the main rocket exhaust ingredient. Unfortunately, as with the environmentally disastrous Space Shuttle, the liquid H2 and liquid O2 were ONLY on the Shuttle itself, not in the solid rocket boosters that lifted it to orbit.

Why is that? There is much more 'BANG for the buck' using solid rocket fuel.

Take a moment to imagine a full beverage can being the solid rocket-fueled spacecraft. Then the PULL-TAB would represent the Space Shuttle payload.

Then there is Rockedyne's PERCHLORATE issue, from rocket fuel testing, that poisoned California's groundwater,
http://www.enviroreporter.com/sinsofrocketdyne
and http://www.freedrinkingwater.com/water-pollution-perchlorate.htm which shut down 300+ wells in CA, and CONTINUES to poison the launch area of Cape Canaveral with every launch. http://www.organicconsumers.org/perchlorate.htm

And another eye-opening article: http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2011-07-31-nasa-environmental-cleanup_n.htm

One more informational tidbit about Rocketdyne irresponsible practice. Did you know that they built the 10.5 lb. plutonium 238 nuclear reactor for the Curiosity Rover? http://www.enviroreporter.com/?s=rocketdyne&x=0&y=0

The fact of the matter is, that if WE THE PEOPLE decided once and for all, not to pursue this folly of BLASTING OFF from the Earth, then the reason to keep having all of this continuing pollution occur, and all of the HUMAN SUFFERING that it causes, also goes away!

For, an unlovely state will die for want of attention. And, these states might best be rubbed out by imagining "'beauty for ashes and joy for mourning. It's called, "Love your neighbor as you would want to be loved".

The rest is pretty much commentary for a full and happy life.





Posted by darinselby
9th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
It's a toss-up
Which is funnier, the verbosity or the content
Posted by theotherwill
9th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!