Follow this blog:
RSS

The Morning Briefing: Climate change

By | February 14, 2012, 2:03 AM PST

“The Morning Briefing” is SmartPlanet’s daily roundup of must-reads from the web. This morning we’re reading the latest news concerning climate change.

1.) Canada pulls the plug on environmental programs. Scientists in the U.S. say they are concerned that Canadian budget cuts will hamper important international research efforts on climate change, pollution and other regional issues that cut across political boundaries. The cuts have affected the Environment Canada, the government agency responsible for meteorological services and environmental research.

2.) Valentine’s Day destroyed by climate change? A new report from the environmental group Climate Nexus notes that climate change is poised to affect Valentine’s Day in the future, by threatening chocolate production. Research from the International Center for Tropical Agriculture found last year that as temperatures rise, the principal growing regions for cocoa could shrink.

3.) Antarctica’s fish threatened by climate change? A study led by Yale University of the evolutionary history of Antarctic fish and their “anti-freeze” protein production illustrates how tens of millions of years ago a lineage of fish adapted to newly formed polar conditions — and how today they are endangered by a warming ocean temperatures. Thomas Near, associate professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and lead author of the study said: “A rise of 2 degrees centigrade of water temperature will likely have a devastating impact on this Antarctic fish lineage, which is so well adapted to water at freezing temperatures.”

4.) Edinburgh’s supercomputers ‘could tackle climate change’. A new generation of £125m ($198m) supercomputers based in Edinburgh, UK, has the potential to discover new inhabitable planets, tackle climate change and even solve the global financial crisis according to their developers.The machines, known as HECToR and BlueGene have a combined power equivalent to every person on the planet carrying out 250,000 calculations per second at the same time. The machines’ development is being expanded, and the HECToR model is already ten times as powerful as it was when it started out in 2008.

5.) Today’s ‘100-year floods’ may happen every three to 20 years according to research. Powerful storms such as Hurricane Irene could become more frequent weather events, according to researchers from MIT and Princeton University. The team have found that with climate change, such storms could make landfall far more frequently, causing powerful, devastating storm surges every three to 20 years. The group simulated tens of thousands of storms under different climate conditions, finding that today’s “500-year floods” could, with climate change, occur once every 25 to 240 years.

Image credit: Teo Romera

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Amateur hour. Blame Global warming for mans stupidity.
The authors lack of understanding of basic probelms is killing me.

100 year floods is a media term. The proper definition of a 100 year flood plane means the odds of a flood are 1 in 100 during any given year.

It also needs to be noted that most flood plain tables were created when much of the country was still rural. Paving over hundreds of square miles in a flood plain, installing storm drains to rush the water away and the destruction of countless acres of water holding wet lands has altered the natural flow of water in many parts of the country.

Flash floods happen far more often than they did 100 years ago and major flooding downstream happens far more often. We have also over developed in flood prone areas adding to the impact of rising water.

Did you know that there has been over $3 billion in development in areas that were submerged fields during the Great 1993 Mississippi flood?

Who is dumber? The person who built there or the person who blames global warming for the results of other peoples stupidity?
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 14th Feb 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Heavy precipitation is different than heavy runoff
While you make a good point about over-development in floodplains and the role of increased amounts of impermeable surfaces in the role of flash floods, this is not the only issue at all. According to "Global Climate Change Impacts in the US" by Karl, Melillo and Peterson (Cambridge Press), the amount of rain that falls during intense precipitation events has increased 20% in the US over the last century and overall precipitation is up by 7%. This is at the same time that heat waves, droughts, higher low temperatures and other extreme weather events have increased.

So you can see that increased flooding is largely influenced by increased precipitation. Even if folks had not built in floodplains and paved over landscapes that were formerly able to absorb more water. Can folks minimize floods with more sensible siting, creating rain gardens and the like? Of course. But the flood levels of what used to be 500 year level floods is occurring much more frequently, and that is mainly attributable to an increase in precipitation.
Posted by klassman6
14th Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Just looked at report. Interesting
It contradicts it's self several times by alternatly stating, quote - Drought, related to reduced precipitation - and quote - increases in heavy downpours.

The bottom line conclusion they are saying on rain fall seems to be we are getting less rain overall, but in shorter more intense storms.

http://www.globalchange.gov/what-we-do/assessment/previous-assessments/global-climate-change-impacts-in-the-us-2009
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 15th Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
That's not a contradiction
Climate change is increasing both ends of the weather spectrum: droughts AND floods. These extreme events are occurring on the regional level, while globally, precipitation is increasing due to increased water vapor that the warmer atmosphere can hold.
Posted by klassman6
15th Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Double talk.
They are claiming a slight drop in rain fall is behind the drought in the desert southwest because we as a society lack the ability to deal with fewer more intense storms.

How about we face facts folks.

The same level of drought hit the US southwest in the 1950s, but did not impact as many people because millions of people now live in what used to be open desert in the 1950s.

Over development is the basis of the severity of this drought. Not some half-cocked theory of improperly managed rainfall.
Posted by Hates Idiots
20th Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Context?
The article about the new supercomputers at Edinburgh is certainly of interest to UK citizens, but how do they compare to other supercomputers elsewhere?
Posted by hoodedswan
14th Feb 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!