Follow this blog:
RSS

Spain’s high-speed rail: comfort, convenience trump green

By | March 19, 2010, 4:21 AM PDT

If you’re a government that wants to encourage its citizens to get on the high-speed rail bandwagon, skip the “green” argument and aim right for comfort and convenience.

At least that’s how Spain is doing it.

A new report in the New York Times explains how the Iberian nation is successfully tackling its E.U. promise to lower carbon dioxide emissions by 20 percent over the next 10 years by insisting that Spaniards ditch cars and airplanes for sleek, new high-speed rail.

By “insisting,” of course, I mean using economic leverage. The Alta Velocidad Española, or AVE, says little about the environment but lots about service, with ticket holders the beneficiaries of assigned reclining seats, computer outlets, movies, headsets, good food and gloved attendants as part of their fare.

Can you get that with your $200 one-way plane ticket?

Underneath all those amenities, though, are real numbers: each passenger who takes the train generates just one-fourth the emissions of those making the same trip by car or plane.

That’s a fast track to meeting Spain’s national greenhouse gas goals.

Current high-speed lines connect Madrid with Barcelona, Seville and Málaga, with trains topping out around 186 miles per hour. (To compare, the high-speed Amtrak Acela Express line that runs from Washington to Boston tops out at 71 mph.)

One professor quoted in the article believes that all trips less than 800 miles will eventually be dominated by rail travel.

In Europe, that’s Barcelona to Paris (520 miles), or Paris to Rome (687 miles).

In the U.S, that’s New York to Chicago (711 miles) or San Francisco to Las Vegas (570 miles).

Meanwhile, trains require fewer personnel and less costly infrastructure to operate.

Will the U.S. high-speed rail effort grab this kind of attention? It’s unlikely. Approximately $8 billion in federal stimulus funds was set aside for high-speed rail investments, largely in Florida, California and Illinois.

In contrast, Spain has set aside half of its $160 billion transport budget by 2020 for the cause.

Images: Baldiri/Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Spain's high-speed rail: comfort, convenience trump green
And as they become more popular terrorists will start to bomb them and security will increase and... real world, people.
Posted by jemd@...
19th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Spain's high-speed rail: comfort, convenience trump green
jemd, Spanish railways have already been the target of terrorist bombs. 191 people were killed and 1800 people wounded in Madrid in 2004 when commuter trains were bombed. Even with increased security requirements, railways have inherent advantages over short haul air travel because their terminuses tend to be close to the center of the city.
Posted by CageySee
21st Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Switching from The Car Culture is One Key
That the USA can't reconcile. It's amazing how much public money is diverted to private pockets for self-defeating programs. Not that public rail would not be noble it's simply got too many external issues to address that are industrial and social. Besides, there are so many things on the dole these days because either people aren't able to accept failure or can't be responsible for their own terrible decisions and businesses seemingly can't compete or can't fail. Somebody must be reaping profit somewhere, from the subsidies no less, but the same old systems are supported by political influence not good sense. Terrible that we can't break paradigms and retool industries for improving communities and implementing transportation systems.
Posted by donnydo77@...
22nd Mar 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!