Follow this blog:
RSS

Scientists predict if you will reach age 100

By | January 20, 2012, 2:55 AM PST

U.S scientists at Boston University have reported that they can predict the longevity of a person through a new blood test.

With up to 85 percent accuracy, the newly-developed test has been created through studying the DNA of 801 centenarians in conjunction with a control group of 914 ‘healthy’ people. Through their analysis, 281 genetic varieties have been identified in the centenarian group. The complex formula identified particular genes in an attempt to ascertain which genetic variants could contribute to unusual longevity in humans.

By discovering these genetic markers, the researchers were able to formulate a test to predict whether people would live beyond 100 by a rate of 60 to 85 percent accuracy. The test may explain why unusually long lives tend to run in families, despite lifestyle choices such as diet, smoking and exercise — which would normally be considered to contribute to various lifespans.

Dr. Perls, a Boston Medical Center geriatrician suggested:

“This is a useful step towards meaningful predictive medicine and personal genomics. When people can do this kind of analysis on whole genome sequences for traits that have important genetic components, the predictive value should be even better.”

In terms of age-related conditions, such as dementia and heart failure, this new medical development could be useful to scientists hoping to discover new treatments.

Originally published in the journal PLoS ONE in July 2010, the study was later restricted due to the accuracy of the data. After peer review by Yale University academics, the research that is now once again public is the corrected version. An additional data set of participants with an average age of 107 is included in the new paper.

The test’s accuracy is reported to increase in relation to the age of the participant — the older they are, the narrower the inaccuracy rates become when predicting their potential lifespan.

This kind of research may contribute to degenerative disease understanding and potential curation in the future. By understanding more about age-related disease, our pharmacopoeia could expand to illnesses that we currently have little means of treating. Tim Spector, Professor of Genetic Epidemiology at Kings College London, said:

“The big news is is that there is not one gene for ageing, it is literally hundreds of genes and some might be inherited in clusters but we do not yet know how they work. If we can work it out then there is the possibility of anti-ageing therapies.”

To view the full study, click here.

Image credit: Saint Louis University Madrid Campus/ Flickr

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is morning editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Morning Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
slippery slope
The last thing you want is for someone to be able to accurately determine your life span.
The next logical step is for Insurance companies to use this technique to get more money from their customers...
Posted by tech_ed@...
20th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
It works both ways
If you test out as someone who has a longer, relatively healthy lifespan you should be able to get lower rates on health insurance than someone who tests out at a shorter lifespan.

If you go out to get health insurance as an individual, you will find that the health insurance company uses things such as your lifestyle and current chronic conditions to set the rates you pay. How would this be any different?

If you place a bet on a sports team, is it wrong to look at the team's record, the performance of individuals, or any other statistic? Should you be forced to have no particular knowledge about a team when you make a bet?
Posted by zackers
Updated - 22nd Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!