Follow this blog:
RSS

Researchers say nose an accurate biometric indicator; could join fingerprint, iris scanning

By | March 5, 2010, 12:23 PM PST

Nose scans could be a better method of identification than using iris or fingerprint scanning alone, according to a new study.

Researchers from the University of Bath (U.K.) say noses, which can be scanned in three-dimensions and mapped using measurements for its tip, ridge profile and “nasion” (area between the eyes), have been underrated in the field of biometrics.

In the study, the researchers used a photographic system called PhotoFace to scan in three-dimensions the shape of 40 volunteers’ noses. (PhotoFace was originally developed by researchers at the University of the West of England and Imperial College London.)

Their analysis revealed six distinct nose shapes: Roman, Greek, Nubian, Hawk, Snub and Turn-up.

According to the scientists, noses are harder to conceal and remain relatively unchanged during facial expression. Though irises are more accurate, eyelids or glasses make them difficult to capture.

The scientists were quick to note that

There’s no one magic biometric – irises are a powerful biometric, but can be difficult to capture accurately and can easily be obscured by eyelids or glasses,” said Bath researcher Adrian Evans in a statement. “Noses, however, are much easier to photograph and are harder to conceal, so a system that recognises noses would work better with an uncooperative subject or for covert surveillance.”

The researchers have since expanded their database to 160 people and are working to see if their software can distinguish between relatives or pick people from a large group.

If successful, the technique could be used in conjunction with existing biometric indicators for more accurate identification.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
I've heard of counting noses, but this is ridiculous
However, you could do a nose print and scan the number and arrangement of nasal pores.
Posted by Dr_Zinj
8th Mar 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!