Follow this blog:
RSS

Office work increases toxicity in bloodstreams?

By | February 14, 2012, 6:24 AM PST

According to new research, individuals that spend long hours in office settings carry high levels of toxic chemicals, polyfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in their blood.

The office building. A place many of us spend a large proportion of our days in — sallow lighting, cubicles and the continual buzz of phones and chatter in your ears. In some jobs it may be mind-numbing, but according to a new study, it may also affect your health.

The research, conducted by Boston University, questions whether office features including carpet and furniture, often treated with polyfluorinated compounds increases levels of PFCs in relation to time spent in such buildings.

The Boston researchers found that workers putting in long hours had higher levels of these chemicals within their bloodstreams than colleagues who spent more time outside of the office. An environmental health scientist at Boston, the author of the study Michael McClean said:

“When we think of occupational exposures, it’s easy to think about construction workers or welders. We wanted to look at those environments and see what was in the air.”

The research was undertaken through 31 adults living and working in office buildings across Boston. 25 percent of the offices were located in recently constructed buildings, 50 percent in partially renovated, older buildings — and one quarter that have not been recently renovated.

According to the research, the overall levels of PFCs within the air were highest in the new buildings, and accounts for 36 percent of PFC levels within a bloodstream.

This suggests that many office workers in the labor force are being exposed to high levels of toxic chemicals that are airborne, although no specific health issues were explored through the study. However, it has been linked in other studies to health issues including a range of developmental effects, smaller birth weight, developmental delays, organ abnormalities, and reproductive issues. A number of studies have suggested that exposure to PFCs have become widespread, and are global contaminants that pollute and damage the bodies of both humans and animals.

The study is published in the current Environmental Science & Technology journal, and was funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

(via News Discovery)

Image credit: Phil Whitehouse

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Conclusions on a sample size of 31?
This study may be congruent with other studies, but I can't believe how this study is touted as conclusive evidence when there was a small sample size of 31 in a few buildings and in one particular location - Boston. Yet we are to believe that office work everywhere causes PFC toxicities. Most responsible researchers cite the limitations to their studies so one is getting the whole picture - but I guess that doesn't make for such an exciting article now does it.
Posted by an entrepreneur
14th Feb 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
You're right
Especially when you take into consideration that 25% of 31 is only 7.75 people...
Posted by Jeffp77
14th Feb 2012
-1 Votes
+ -
Stupid buildings and potheads against tobacco at work
see below.
Posted by Macdoodle
Updated - 17th Feb 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
And outside the office?
For telecommuters, are PFCs not as prevalent in home furniture & carpeting as they are in office furniture & carpeting? People who drive during work may not have as much exposure to PFCs, but they get exposed to other chemicals while they're on the road.
Posted by hoodedswan
14th Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Different exposures for home workers.
Many household cleaners and most new home construction materials give off VOC's which are an entirely different danger.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 15th Feb 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
It is Common Sense
It is common sense that confinement is not a natural condition for people. Get out and get some fresh air.
Posted by EVsRoll
15th Feb 2012
-1 Votes
+ -
Stupid buildings and potheads against tobacco at work
Not so smart as they claim "smart buildings" are often stupid buildings because people cant open windows in good weather costs energy and keeps toxins in.

Pot heads against tobacco are not considering the pretty smelling toxins note outdoor smoking means childhood allergy & asthma is way down as proof right? NOPE.

Indoor smoking issue is only replaced with more pretty smelling toxins : scented cleaners, pesticides, and newer cheaper more toxic perfumes and beauty products that mix and fester in the airducts of those sealed envornments . We still just pick on the poorest so easiest group , (minorities ,disabled, veterans ,and other poorest tend to be the majority of smokers) while we plug it in plug it in on big biz's pretty smelling killers.
Posted by Macdoodle
17th Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
politics and $
Indoor smoking issue is only replaced with more pretty smelling toxins : scented cleaners, pesticides, and newer cheaper more toxic perfumes and beauty products that mix and fester in the airducts of those sealed envornments . We still just pick on the poorest so easiest group , (minorities ,disabled, veterans ,and other poorest tend to be the majority of smokers) while we plug it in plug it in on big biz's pretty smelling killers.
Posted by Macdoodle
17th Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
http://www.appliedergonomics.com
This suggests that many office workers in the labor force are being exposed to high levels of toxic chemicals that are airborne, although no specific health issues were explored through the study.
Posted by AppliedErgonomics1
1st May
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!