Follow this blog:
RSS

Novel idea: a digital database for car parts

By | December 22, 2011, 9:31 AM PST

Jason Torchinsky over at Deadspin has a brilliant proposal: Google should create a digital database for car parts.

Not just a text-based one with which to find which parts are available for what, though that’d be a nice start. No, Torchinsky wants a database of literal car parts: the specifications needed to instruct a 3D printer to make the thing, right there before your eyes, in three dimensions.

He writes, citing the plight of the auto enthusiast:

Even now, for most cars over 30 years old, parts availability is a huge issue. [...] So I propose we start scanning and saving parts now. This, of course, is not trivial, as 3D scanners are still pretty expensive, but they are around. Most major art schools with Automotive Design departments, like Art Center in Pasadena, have one. And 3D printers are getting cheaper and more accessible every year. It’s just a matter of time before they’re everywhere. The parts would be printed in plastic, which may be fine for dash knobs and interior fittings, but they’d have to be cast in metal for heavier-duty use, which is a good thing from your local independent machinist’s perspective.

Torchinsky likens it to Google’s Books venture, where it scans the books of major research institutions for archival purposes. But that venture didn’t exactly go over so well, financially and legally.

Still, it’s a sound proposal, even if it’s a bit before its time. (As he suggests, 3D printing remains awfully expensive and lacks scale — but it’s in use today. Auto designers use the technique to quickly create and test prototypes.)

Here’s hoping we can visit Pep Boys for a brand new car part made on the premises, and not merely shipped in from Anywhere, U.S.A. Perhaps then we’ll be able to replace parts more acutely, instead of replacing half the dashboard when you only needed one panel.

The only thing I wonder: would we build cars differently as a result?

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Printing Auto Parts
This is an excellent idea, after reading the specs on HP's 3d printers the idea of custom printed auto parts occurred to me. It seems to me that manufacturers could start the process with current models as most of the parts data already exists in their cad programs. A dealership could stock raw materials in the service department, plastic, resin, aluminum, and when parts are needed print them from a proprietary data base. Imagine the reduced shipping and inventory cost. This represents the ultimate Just In Time Inventory. The idea of scanning older parts is a very cool evolution of the thought and could help manufacturers & their associated dealerships build additional revenue, loyalty and recapture past customers.
Posted by tom.r.daly
22nd Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Auto Shipping
R u looking for auto shipping company . We are here to help you. For more Click Here
Posted by kmbappi
Updated - 17th May
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!