Follow this blog:
RSS

New nanospheres are stiffer than steel; use for medical implants

By | October 25, 2010, 7:54 AM PDT

Scientists have developed self-assembling, transparent nanospheres that are stiffer than steel — and even Kevlar.

The Israeli scientists, led by Itay Rousso from Weizmann Institute of Science and Ehud Gazit from Tel Aviv University, developed the nanospheres from a simple protected dipeptide molecule.

The result is the stiffest organic material ever invented, the researchers claim. In fact, only diamond probes were able to make an indentation in the biological material, Rousso said.

The value of such a material lies in strengthening composites, for as diverse applications as medical implants and a space elevator.

Yes, a space elevator.

While the researchers are quick to admit in a Chemistry World report that there’s a big gap between their discovery and such uses, it’s certainly another step forward in materials science.

Specifically, the spheres were made from N-tert-butoxycarbonyl (Boc)-protected diphenylalanine, which in unprotected form is the key ingredient in the beta-amyloid protein that facilitates plaques in the brain that form as a result of Alzheimer’s disease.

The diameters of the highly-ordered spheres ranged from 30nm to 2um.

So how strong are these things? For comparison’s sake, a 1um-diameter particle had a 275GPa Young’s modulus — a measure of stiffness – compared to 200GPa for steel and 130GPa for Kevlar.

The difference is that the molecules’ structure — and thus stiffness — may rely on pH. That fact could limit the environments in which the material could be used, but could also give it a “trigger” that transforms it into a smart material.

[via PopSci]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New nanospheres are stiffer than steel; use for medical implants
Self-assembling?
Posted by alloro
25th Oct 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New nanospheres are stiffer than steel; use for medical implants
When you start rigorously measuring qualities like hardness and stiffness, and reporting numbers like 275GPa, then there is no longer any such thing as "steel," but rather 2,000 different kinds of steel that vary as to the amount of carbon in them and how rapidly they were cooled from high temperatures (the same composition steel can be hard or soft depending on how rapidly it was cooled) and the presence of other constituents like nickel, chromium, boron... all kinds of things. So to tell us this stuff is "stiffer than steel" tells us nothing useful.
Posted by Robert Hahn
25th Oct 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New nanospheres are stiffer than steel; use for medical implants
"When you start rigorously measuring qualities like hardness and stiffness, and reporting numbers like 275GPa, then there is no longer any such thing as "steel," but rather 2,000 different kinds of steel that vary"...

Well, 2000 different kinds of steel means there IS such a thing as steel; in fact, it sounds like there's a lot more steel out there than most of us realized!

Perhaps you meant there were 2,000 different kinds of metal?
Posted by ddferrari
25th Oct 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: New nanospheres are stiffer than steel; use for medical implants
The sphere shape is a potential stumbling block for any tension-critical application such as a space elevator ribbon.

In fact, there are a plethora of substances suitable for the COMPRESSION strengths such a structure would require (ie, the clamping strength needed to keep a good grip on the flat cable).

But ANYTHING that can ONLY take a spherical shape ("self-" assembly) will prove very difficult to work with, in terms of engineering the TENSION strength needed to support the whole weighty edifice into the orbital zone, and to carry the upward weight of the required counterbalance at the "top" of the cable.

In fact, I would estimate the usefulness of this development in tension applications to be near zero, unless something dramatic happens to the design (such as developing long fibers with it).

I think long buckytubes are still the best bet.
Posted by Lightning Joe
26th Oct 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!