Follow this blog:
RSS

iPads to replace TVs on planes?

By | June 6, 2012, 4:12 AM PDT

What happens when you rip out the entertainment features of a Boeing 777 and instead use mobile devices to keep adults and children alike from getting bored?

We’ve just found out. Singapore Airline Scoot has removed all of its aircraft entertainment systems and instead is offering fliers the option of renting iPads on their trip.

Singapore Airlines Ltd, the parent company, affirmed the decision and pushed ahead with stripping out the planes along with other changes.

The result? A decrease in the overall weight of the planes by seven percent, which rolled out across all of their aircraft will save a huge amount in fuel costs which has jumped 36 percent in the last few years alone. Not only this, but the seating capacity of the craft has jumped by 40 percent.

Fuel currently accounts for approximately 40 percent of airline expenditure, and will keep rising — no doubt giving many airline CEOs sleepless nights. Any innovative method that will free up some of this cost could help an airline gain a competitive edge in future business — and it’s likely that other airlines will begin to follow suit.

More seats available, less fuel to run — financially, this is a smart move.

The new budget airline Scoot charges $17 per flight for the rental, and business customers are given the iPads for free. The iPads are pre-loaded with movies, music and games to keep customers happy, and even though the rental charge may seem expensive, this means Scoot gains back their investment after the 30th customer if they invest in 16GB models.

Scoot profits from lighter planes, lower fuel costs and gaining an additional revenue stream. Customers that don’t mind paying to rent the items have a better experience, but those who are unwilling to pay lose the free option.

It’s understandable, and probably won’t be too long before some airline companies ground their planes permanently because they cannot afford to run them. Budget airlines offer a seat, and then the additional costs — such as checking in online or having a cup of coffee — are included.

We may expect long-haul trips to include entertainment, but it’s not necessary, and its unlikely Scoot will be the only airline to implement these changes.

Image credit: Johan Larsson

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Makes a lot of sense.
As pointed out, contemporary entertainment systems on airlines are quite heavy. (And the technology behind them is usually 10 to 15 years old) They take up space, and they also use a fair amount of power as well. iPads are comparatively light and energy efficient. Also consider that most and more people now carry their own entertainment with them anyway; be it iPads, smartphones, Kindles, etc, rendering in-flight entertainment systems redundant in most seats.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
6th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
More seats?
Not sure how they added that many seats? Removing the back of the headrest screen does not change seat size. The central hardware to run the system did not take that many seat positions.

And if they did add that many seats what happens to leg room?? Coach is tight enough already.
Posted by TrueDinosaur
6th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
It's about weight; not seat size or space.
On the very long range intercontinental flights, the limiting factor isn't interior space but weight. Large, long range aircraft like the 777 have the space to carry more passengers, but cannot because they must carry enough fuel for the overseas routes they fly, and more passengers & cargo would exceed the maximum permitted gross weight of the aircraft (The aircraft itself, passengers, cargo & fuel). For each 300 pounds or so of electronics removed means one more passenger can be accommodated in its place.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 6th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
$17 rental on Scoot - LOL
$17 rental on budget Scoot - LOL.

The low cost carriers have no shame.

Though if they really wanted to save weight, just ripping out the rubbish quality prehistoric tape based airline entertainment systems and replacing them with something digital would by and large do the same.

Weight ... carrying much less duty free lolly would save here too happy
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
6th Jun
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!