Follow this blog:
RSS

Infographic: This is why you’re fat, America

By | March 13, 2010, 9:16 AM PST

The prices of food and beverages have fluctuated quite a bit in the last 30 years — and you’ll be shocked to know that soda is now cheaper to purchase than a bag of oranges.

Of course, if you frequent the grocery store, this may not come as a surprise. But the proof is in the data. According to this chart of inflation-adjusted data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the price of food we generally deem “unhealthy” — soda, butter and beer have seen double-digit percentage price decreases as fish, vegetables and fruit have seen drastic increases.

Here’s the outlay comparing now to 1978:

  • Soda (orange line) is 33 percent cheaper
  • Butter (dark brown) is 29 percent cheaper
  • Beer (gray) is 15 percent cheaper
  • Fish (yellow) is 2 percent more expensive
  • Vegetables (purple) are 41 percent more expensive
  • Fruits (green) are 46 percent more expensive.
  • Bucking the trend, cookies (blue) are now more expensive.

David Leonhardt, who compiled the chart, offers more detail at the Economix blog:

The price of oranges, to take one extreme example (not shown in the chart), has more than doubled, relative to everything else. So if in 1978, a bag of oranges cost the same as one big bottle of soda, today that bag costs the same as three big bottles of soda.

Meanwhile, the average 18-year-old today is 15 pounds heavier than his or her counterpart in the 1970s, while adults have put on more than 20 pounds more than their 1970s selves.

As Leonhardt explains, it’s all about how these products are taxed or subsidized — and the resulting behavior by consumers when they arrive at the cash register.

[via Consumerist]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
15
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Fat with ignorance
You're comparing apples and oranges...pun intended.

"More expensive" is a perception issue, not one of reality.

The reality is that, ounce for ounce nutritionally, fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables are still much "cheaper" than alternative "foods".

Look at non-organic nuts (esp almond and walnuts), typically found for around $7.00 per pound or about $0.43 per serving or about half the price of a can of soda. We can drink a thousand cans of soda and we will still not have consumed a fraction of the nutritional value of a single serving of nuts.

Chips sell for $3-4 per bag, or $0.25-$0.33 per serving. How many servings of typical non-wholegrain chips might you have to consume to equal the value of a single serving of nuts, spinach, kale or yogurt? Several or more (and even then you would be deficient in key vitamins, minerals, bacteria, proteins and healthy fats).

The reality is that most consumers do not look at the ROI of the foods that they eat. They wouldn't even understand the acronym I just used and how it applies to nutrition.

America is fat because it is, by and large. tremendously ignorant. And that ignorance transcends nutrition.
Posted by josephmartins
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Infographic: This is why you're fat, America
I think the author's point is that it is cheaper ecconomically to be fat, i.e. eat the wrong foods. He is not saying it makes more sense to be fat. The further point is that it used to be easier economically to eat healthier food. He's talking about money, you're talking about nutrition. But he wasnt' trying to say that people are fat because they are ignorant (which is true) but that it is cheaper to be fat (which is also true in the narrow view of how much an item costs).
Posted by mhmyers@...
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Furthermore
The same reasoning can be applied to processed foods such as prepared, frozen, generally high-sodium, high fat family meals (aka convenience foods) which sell for several dollars each and serve 4-6 people.

Ounce for nutritional ounce, they're much more expensive than fresh and frozen fruits, meats and veggies.

Yes the cost of the crappy stuff continues to decrease, but even at pennies per serving it can't touch (nutritionally speaking) the value of healthier alternatives. That is to say it will "fill your belly", but not in a good way.
Posted by josephmartins
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
No Myers you are dead wrong
We're both talking about money. I am talking about the immediate cost of the food itself and the nutritional value it'll deliver...as well as the downstream hidden healthcare costs of poor nutritional choices.

It's not cheaper to be fat. If you can show the rest of us how it is less expensive to be fat I'll admit I am wrong.

As someone who dropped nearly 50 pounds and is in the best shape of his life after 15+ years of poor nutritional choices, I can tell you it is not about money (my monthly food bill has decreased by more than 50%) and doesn't require fancy diets, diet aids and gym memberships. I simply changed my eating habits and finally began practicing what I used to preach.
Posted by josephmartins
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
It's about the trend
I think the key thing here is trend. The cost of living from consuming "healthy food" is increasing while the cost of unhealthy food is either stable or decreasing. There might be numerous factors, but here what's important to notice is the overall trend - not ounce per ounce cost comparison in my opinion.
Posted by alexboudreau
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Infographic: This is why you're fat, America
I still think that it is quite ridiculous for people to try to use excuses other than pure gluttony to explain being Fat. In the past 18 months I have very easily lost over 125 lbs - down to 125 at 5'10" tall - and all that is required to stay this way is to limit my food intake. This has been very easy to do and in no way inconvenient. I can absolutely not respect anyone who eats to the point of being overweight. Perhaps the rise in food prices will do us all good.
Posted by CharlesEtheridge@...
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Infographic: This is why you're fat, America
I agree that this article's title is at best misleading. We shouldn't use the price index as an excuse for being overweight. However, it does opens the door for more questions. Why is it that staple food prices are increasing at this rate? Especially since the data is supposed to be normalized for inflation. So this says it costs us much more to by fruits and vegetables. Is it the increased cost in distribution, lower crop yields, or simply because companies are charging more? Perhaps because much less produce is grown locally? (that would be my guess) I don't know for everyone else, but I would certainly like to see more data with regards to the factors I mention.
Posted by alexboudreau
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Infographic: This is why you're fat, America
You are what you eat not how much you paid for it !!!!

Now where did I hear that before?
Posted by khward@...
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Infographic: This is why you're fat, America
> and you?ll be shocked to know that soda is now
> cheaper to purchase than a bag of oranges

Not really; soda is corn syrup (once a by-product of more valuable corn stuffs, and then it became high-fructose which is even worse on our bodies) and water. Oranges take time and space to grow and ripen. Both obviously require harvest etc, but corn is more valuable to many industries; not so much oranges.

So, explain why we would be shocked?

> America is fat because it is, by and large,
> tremendously ignorant.
Yep, I absolutely agree. Not just in food purchases, but Americans don't want to know much of anything about what they're buying, doing, or consuming. It saddens me.
Posted by lefty.crupps
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Infographic: This is why you're fat, America
Alex,

The cost of basic nutrition is, for me, the foundation of this type of discussion. Why? Simply because malnutrition is a path toward illness, long-term health issues and additional costs.

So we must ask ourselves what it costs to meet the basic nutritional requirements of an infant, toddler, teenager and adult. That is to say, what does it cost to eat what is necessary, not only for survival but for good health.

And we can do that by simply looking at rough nutritional guidelines and map that to the costs of meeting those guidelines. Frankly, I believe the national guidelines are outdated, but that's my opinion and at least its recommendations provide us with a starting point.

The cost of living from consuming healthy foods has only gone up substantially relative to unhealthy choices if you compare the two dollar for dollar, calorie for calorie without considering nutritional value. It is important to understand that calories do not equate to nutrition.

What I have been trying to convey is that the actual cost of eating healthy, based on bang for nutritional buck, is not what most people believe it to be. As I wrote earlier, my food costs have decreased dramatically, while the nutritional content and value of my diet has gone up substantially.

For those who take the time to understand nutrition, the health benefits and savings can be significant. Even if the retail costs of healthier alternatives is going up, the overall cost of "eating healthy" is not.
Posted by josephmartins
15th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
personal responsibility
it seems many revel in the general ugly trend of dodging
personal responsibility, seeking all manner of causes out of their
control for why they are fat.

there is nothing in the gene pool or grocery store or government
policy or food industry conspiracy or whatever else they imagine
making them fat.

they are fat because of daily lifestyle choices they make that
make them fat.
Posted by mseker
17th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Infographic: This is why you're fat, America
How elitist of you. Often the poor are overweight because things are not explained to them in language that they can understand. Additionally, if you have five (5) children, handing them a few nuts will not satisfy their hunger. People often choose the candy over fruit due to depression brought on by poverty. Walk a mile in another?s' shoes.
Posted by Lawrence_b
18th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Infographic: This is why you're fat, America
I think you are right on Lawrence_b. In todays economic climate many people need to opt for quantity over quality.

High carb foods go further then healthy food. They choose candy over fruit because they can buy more for the same amount.

We all should walk a mile in anothers shoes before we are unduly harsh with them.
Posted by Gdarmenio
18th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
A Proposal Worth Regarding & Investigating
Should inspire people to validate Mr Leonhardt's assertion by checking their local areas. Sure, there are other factors along with the socio-economic, culutural, and personal considerations. Someone has alluded to it but it is the components in food that have a great impact to nutrition and well-being. It seems strange in referring to the constituents of a food as components. Labeling is struggling to reveal the ingredients even for foods that should be taken for granted the item is what it appears to be. Packaging is a big problem too for everything seems to be wrapped, tied, collected, handled, etc. Anyway, the matter is that the first choice of healthy beverage should be fresh wholesome vegetable or fruit juice, right? Wrong, because as someone implied earlier, too many chemicals and additives are misleading people into mistaking the alternative as healthier. Fillers and sweeteners such as HFCS have infiltrated nearly everything to decimate the nutritional content of foods that many would list on their diet as healthy. That is the type of food that is accessible for all. The most flagrant violators are brand names that used to be trustworthy purveyors of fine beverages but now provide imposters composed of artifically colored syrupy sludge. I would drink the juice composed of only the inherent sugars because that is sweet enough and allows the flavor to be tasted. Oddly, I've seen juices that are near natural content but without HFCS get labeled as Diet. It truly is a matter for thought but I can't help but determine that incompassion, socio-economic factors, ignorance, hypocrisy and even political conspiracy all contribute to the debacle surrounding food, diet, and the effects not just on personal but the health of communities.
Posted by donnydo77@...
31st Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Not the kind of beer I drink!
I'm sure the stuff they based the chart on was cheap American megabrews. The beer I buy is about twice as expensive and is better for you. Then again, the beer I drink is mostly homebrew, which costs less and is even better for you (unfiltered beer contains B complex and some other nutrients). And what little soda I drink is mostly homemade as well.

Then again, maybe that's part of why I'm not overweight.
Posted by LeonBA
16th Apr 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!