Follow this blog:
RSS

In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space

By | September 4, 2009, 11:09 AM PDT

Mitsubishi and IHI Corp. said they will join a $21 billion Japanese project to build a massive solar-powered generator in space within 30 years and beam electricity to earth.

Researchers representing 16 companies will spend four years developing technology to send electricity without cables in the form of microwaves, according to an official statement by the Japan’s trade ministry.

In space, the station will be able to generate power regardless of weather conditions.

The effort is to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and take advantage of the most reliable energy source in the solar system: the Sun.

Japan is developing technology for a 1-gigawatt solar station fitted with roughly 2.5 square miles of solar panels, enough to supply about 294,000 Tokyo homes.

The team hopes to have it running in three decades, according to the trade ministry.

The challenge for the team is to figure out how to transport panels to the solar station 36,000 kilometers above the earth’s surface in a cost-efficient way. Otherwise, the station won’t be commercially viable.

Right now, the project is expected to cost 2 trillion yen, or about $21.5 billion USD. It costs approximately $107,000 USD just to launch a single rocket, according to a deputy director at the ministry quoted in the article.

In the U.S., NASA and the energy department have spent $80 million over three decades in an effort to study solar generation in space, according to a 2007 report by the U.S. National Security Space Office.

Japan’s plan is to launch a small satellite fitted with solar panels in 2015, and test beaming the electricity from space through the ionosphere, the outermost layer of the earth’s atmosphere, according to the trade ministry document.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
23
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
Won't this cause a tremendous amount of microwave pollution? I don't think I'd want to be near the collecting dish.
Posted by miacalcin
8th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
All your energy problems...
...solved by satellites in space.

Except if there is a control error, caused by solar flares or terrorism or whatever then the satellite is raking a path of burning destruction across the land until they can control it. I suppose that a hard-wired safety could be enabled to prevent transmission if a specific localization beam is not received, bet even that could be circumvented.

With Japan being so densely populated, a gigawatt beam of microwave radiation would toast a lot of people fast.

On the plus side, you could aim it at the ocean to vaporize water and create clouds over areas that need them....
Posted by Zorched
8th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
Isn't this exactly the opposite of what we want to combat global warming?

Collecting solar energy which would otherwise miss our planet will increase the total solar energy arriving here, and increase global warming.

These guys need to go back to school!
Posted by dfosberry@...
8th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Looking at the numbers.
Beamed power will not significantly add to the global warming
problem. Global warming is the cumulative effect of CO2
emissions, and focuses on how much heat the Earth's upper
atmosphere retains.

The amount of additional energy added to the Earth's energy
balance from a solar orbital plant is nearly one quadrillionth
trillionth of what hits the planet normally from daylight (which is
about 174 petawatts.) We'd need a lot of orbital energy
platforms to change this.

For those who don't remember from physics class:

Tera = 1000 Giga
Exa = 1000 Tera
Peta = 1000 Exa

We'd be getting a bit shy of 1 quadrillionth the extra energy.

Now, as to the ravening death beam:

First, they're going to pick a microwave frequency that the
Earth's atmosphere is transparent to. This means the beam
won't interact with things in its beam path; that includes water
vapor. Everyone's image of a ravening microwave death beam
comes from using their microwave ovens, which are microwaves
designed to interact with water molecules and heat them up.

Second, the satellite will be set up in geosynchronous orbit,
which means that it stays over the same spot on the Earth's
surface - while the beam will move relative to the ground, that
motion will be measured in centimeters over the course of many
orbits. It's not going to 'carve a swath through a city' like you see
on Saturday morning cartoons.

Third, because of the wavelength needed to get through the
Earth's atmosphere, the likely receiver will be a grid of wires
(almost like a chain link fence) up on posts; the rest will be
handed by radio frequency inductance. Because these beams
will spread as they come down (a function of their very long
wavelengths), the average watts per square meter on the wire
should be fairly low - probably no higher than being around a cell
phone tower or a radio transmitter tower.

Not that there aren't hazards - anything around the beam path is
going to have horrible cell phone and WiFi reception unless
they're very clever. On the other hand, using WiFi or a cell
phone around a high tension power already has this.
Posted by Ad Astra
8th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RR Edwards
Has anyone really thought about this? It is seriously stupid AND a waste of money. Let us solve the global warming issue by putting the Earth in a microwave - BRILLIANT!

This will only be a good idea if we can come up with a heat-sink that will bleed off more heat than this additional radiation will cause.
Posted by riluve
8th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
Thanks for the technical education Ad Astra.

The whole thng looks a bit like "heavier than air flight" to me. Can't possibly beam that much energy that far... can they?
Posted by maysmithb
8th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
Here we go again. Please take some engineering courses before you write about beaming power from space on microwaves.

First off, the difference in Solar flux for a ground based collector is barely different than a space based one (500W/sq m vs 750W/sq m). A concentrated solar cell is about 40% efficient, only if you can get rid of the heat. That is easy to do on the ground, and the heat can be harvested to run steam power conversion. All of this adds weight, and it costs about $5000/lbs for low earth orbit. Figure this structure will clock in at about 20,000lbs, or about $100million just to launch.

Then you have a fleet of them to overfly your receiving point. Think Irridium, they went bankrupt before getting the whole fleet on the air, and just lost one to a collision with a wayward Soviet satellite. Putting the satellite in geosynchronous orbit cost about 4X more. Now think about how long the hardware has to tolerate being operational. It takes station keeping thrust to stay on orbit. Plan on replacing the thing every 10 years.

Now you want to irradiate some piece of real estate with 100KW/sq m RF energy. After you've cleared all the air traffic for miles around, any buzzard unlucky enough to follow the stench of death that it will attract will add to the kill radius. Imagine what it will take to service the receiving array. Put on a chain-mail suit like used in high tension wire service. Hike for miles to get to the site. OK build a shielded tunnel to get there. Then use non-conducting tools to work around the hardware.

Now factor in some reality of the physics of the whole thing. You don't get a nice little spot on the ground like a flashlight. Diffraction effects will produce an "airy disk" around your target, so you will have to cordon off more than 100X the area of primary footprint for the side lobes.

More physics, the Earth doesn't like you mucking around with the planetary geomagnetics. Whatever EMP you plan to put down in the desert somewhere is going to be re-imaged 180 degrees around on the other side of the globe. This is one of the reasons why we stopped doing nuclear tests, it had a nasty habit of knocking out the communications and hardware in places we didn't intend. That was back in the 50's and 60's, before everyone had a PC and an iPod. Add a little havoc like this today, and it'll be be more than a few penguins that get sunburned.
Posted by jackgrat
8th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
Also - geosynchronous orbits spend a lot more time in the dark than you would think. Every night they spend several hours in Earth's shadow. Solar eclipses may be infrequent on Earth, but are more frequent because of closer proximity to the Moon.

Can anyone calculate how much force the solar wind is going to place on 2.5 sq miles of solar array? That load has to corrected for. Either buy brute force (station keeping thrust) or orbit outside of normal (35784 km), which means the hardware would be moving around. That makes the point of aim all the more critical.
Posted by jackgrat
8th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
I read the book a few years ago, it was a lot of effort but in the end it did work....at the time it was sci fi but it looks like the Japanese are going to convert it to reality (maybe). Many of the issues raised here were explored in the book but I can't remember the title. It seems like by the time they really get going on this, the space elevator could be a reality and pay for itself in reduced launch costs.

I wonder how many years a gigawatt platform would need to run to pay back the energy required to launch it (current solar cells require 5 years of operation to payback the energy put into making them...high purity silicon is VERY energy intensive to make).
Posted by BBix
8th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
This is a little up in the air (pardon the slight pun). Sure the frequency will be chosen away from the water dipole resonance of 3GHz, and so won't heat water saturated meats up like it would in an oven, but we are still talking about a huge amount of energy. Whatever frequency we choose will be a huge risk and undoubtedly will induce a resonance in some molecule or other. Also as jackgrat intelligently pointed out there is the issue of atmospheric diffraction, plus transmission losses to consider also.
I cannot see it being worthwhile to beam it back to Earth.

However it could be very worthwhile to build a power farm in space, simply to power Earth's space-based resources. Not only could reusable space ships dock with this power source, but it (along with reflectors/repeaters) could be placed at a lagrange point(s) and beam multiple power streams to various worthy resources. Imagine not having to lug a power source up with every satellite!
It would save money, allow for re-usable & expandable design and modularity, and could act as a focus of research effort in solar energy also. The transmission losses would be negligible as the beam would be traveling through a vacuum, and far less dangerous as there are no people/animals around (that we know of happy ).
Posted by diom1982
9th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
Check this link guys, no need to go to space...
http://www.solarroadways.com/Introduction.htm

It is possible on the earth itself and it is a far better alternative.

Posted by Manish Agrawal
9th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
I thought of this in 9th grade and...
I am flattered that the world is catching up to me circa 9th grade (1993) but I have better ideas than this now on my website at http://worldnick.blogspot.com such as the gravity train. Also about 10 minutes after I thought up the idea I also decided it was too dangerous and the amount of power you would lose would be too much. If you can't shoot missiles out of the air with lasers then you can't beam power (well). Anyway check out my gravity train. It is actually theoretically possible. I liked knowing how smart I was back then and I guess I still like it now. I can't say I have much faith left in my fellow man after a plastic surgeon ****** up my face. Collecting solar power from space is still a good idea...
Posted by worldnick
10th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Ok
Ok I figured it out. This one is a freebie. You use concave mirrors instead of solar panels. You get 100% efficiency because you don't need any conversion.
Posted by worldnick
10th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
The real limiter is getting it there.
One of the comments up above pointed out the fly in the soup:

Energy cost to get the satellite to orbit is a major hassle for
beamed power arrays; it's the reason why going after Lunar
resources is usually part of the issue.

Getting from Luna to Geosynch is about 1/12th the energy from
getting from Modesto to Geosynch.

As to transmission paths and interference - yes, there's going to
be some RF bleed. There are also frequency windows that
should minimize atmospheric dispersion. (For that matter, many
of the techniques we use for adaptive optics on telescopes can
be used to correct for atmospheric dispersion of transmission.)

Another technical issue that needs to be overcome is relay
satellites. The Rayleigh length for most of the candidate
transmission frequencies is going to need relay satellites, and
those WILL move relative to ground stations.

For station keeping, geosynch is kissing the outer edge of the
Van Allen radiation belts; this makes several options for magnetic
station keeping viable.

I'd like to see this studied and see something launched and put
to the test. We can spend money on studies, but until we try, we
won't learn anything useful.

Posted by Ad Astra
10th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
This idea is from the 60's
I recall when this was proposed in the USA several decades ago. They
were going to beam the energy back to a buried underground metal net
somewhere up north, Michigan? people were afraid then that it would fry
all the dairy cattle. People still would rather trust their superstitions than
science. It's totally safe. You get more microwave radiation on a sunny
day than you would from this device. But hey, let's all stay in our caves
for another 100,000 years or so believing in voodoo and witchcraft. It's a
great idea and we (the USA) should be developing this technology, not
Japan.
Posted by feloniuspunk
11th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
nice, but how many bbqed birds will it make?
and then if it gets hit by some space junk, it'll be lazing the earth's surface like a
drunkard trying to hit a urinal..
Posted by Hobyx
11th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
Once long ago in a galaxy far, far away.......Just kidding.
I actually once read a SiFi story about just such method of
capturing solar power and beaming it to earth. The fellow in
charge of the "Station" fell victim to months of isolation and
went quietly mad. He got it in his head that the people of
earth were stealing his power......he could see all those
clusters of light (cities) on the dark side. He found that if he
didn't keep the beam focused tightly on the receptor like he
was supposed to, he could use it like a big eraser and
erase all those clusters and make them quit using his
power. I don't know how accurate the science is....but it
made a good read. The people on earth were in a frenzy to
launch a search and destroy mission before they all got
erased.
Posted by LeSpot
13th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
Can anyone give me a clue why when I leave a message on
here, random hard carriage returns seem to be inserted all
over the place? I'm using Google's browser.
Posted by LeSpot
13th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
They should use thin-film photovoltaic panels - fly them up there rolled up, unroll them like a window shade once in orbit.
Posted by Greenknight_z
16th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
Response and Comments
RESPONSE:

In response to #3 (dfosberry), I disagree that this technology would
increase our global warming. The concept describes using
microwaves, not UV rays. Microwaves do not generate heat on their
own. Any heat derived from them is the result of exciting water and
similar molecules. This is why some things do not heat well in the
microwave.

COMMENTS:

I think there are options that we have yet to invent that will come into
play to fulfill the core idea of this project. We'd also have to consider
the other advantages and disadvantages of such a project:

(+) Weather would not interfere with solar collection from space.
(--) Weather could interfere with the transmission back to Earth.
(+) From space, the device would actually collect more solar energy,
as the atmosphere has not filtered out as much of it, even on a clear
day.

Beaming microwaves means introducing risk:
(--) What if the microwave beam goes off course?
(+) I suspect that there will need to be some sort of device handshake
that says "no soup for you!" if the satellite and earthly devices are not
connected. Not unlike how batteries retain (most of) their charge when
not connected to a device.

Beaming coded light waves could be another way to transmit usable
energy, where we utilize something like a magnifying glass in the sun,
except it could be non-visible light that gets converted into energy at
the ground level. Performing something thats a hybrid between radio
crystals and passive RFID technologies could be a way also, letting
the satellite be the active part and the earth part be the passive part of
the energy cycle.

The ultimate down side is to determine what the waste byproducts
would be. Personally, I'd prefer to leverage space, be it a floating craft
or something based on the moon or elsewhere, to convert / combine /
split atoms of one type into something more usable here and then
transport them back here.
Posted by R1scFactor
16th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
RE: In the future, your electricity will be beamed in from space
Did not get it. Spent a 21 B to make 360 M a year - 300,000 homes average electricity bill $1200 a year = 360 000 000
21B/360M= 58.333 years
It will take 58 years to payoff for the project.
Where did I makee a mistake?
Posted by 333-777
16th Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
33-777 you make sense!...
However the cost per pound will drop per year as lift science continues. Plus - what is wrong with a spaced based intitiative that lasts 58.333 years and longer actually,say 1000? that doesn't leave the earth irradiated by nuclear fission matierials?

And jack-rat - you funny! HA! Ignorant, but funny! None-the-less!
Posted by JCitizen
22nd Sep 2009
0 Votes
+ -
A system such as this...
would not be necessary to put in a normal orbit as usually understood. A big part of it could be placed on the moon, with elements of it to transferr it to simpler geosynchronous orbit by cheap collimators.

We have already solved the control and aiming problems of this with star wars technology; it is a no brainer.

However, I say let the Nipponese waste the money, it will improve their science way ahead of ours and bury our industry even further than it already has, because of our loathing of industrial automation that our unions said wouldn't work!

We can actually come up with simple ground based solutions that will solve the problem anyway. I plan to put my money where my mouth is and start a business soon. I shall not reveal the details, or everyone else will beat me to it!!! Suffice to say, if you are truely aware of what has gone on in the research sector in the last 20 years, you would be pulling all your oil and coal money out and holding it for the new wave!!

We will absolutely bury the competition with $1 a watt in hardware cost!!!!
Posted by JCitizen
22nd Sep 2009
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!