Follow this blog:
RSS

IEEE: Price parity for solar PV, fossil fuels in 10 years

By | June 15, 2011, 7:24 AM PDT

In a decade, solar photovoltaic systems have the potential to be more economical than fossil fuels in generating electricity, according to a new report.

Researchers from IEEE, the technical professional association, say cost parity can be achieved as the efficiency of solar PV cell technologies increases, creating economies of scale that decrease manufacturing costs.

Why? Because:

  • The supply of silicon, a material used for solar PV, is more available than it was just five years ago.
  • Advancements in thin-film materials (residential) and concentrated PV (commercial) are increasing the efficiency of converting sunlight to electricity.
  • Global solar PV capacity has been increasing at an average annual growth rate of more than 40 percent since 2000, according to the International Energy Association.
  • By 2050, it is predicted that solar PV will provide 11 percent of global electricity production — 3,000 gigawatts of cumulative installed capacity.

The details are thin, but IEEE researchers insist solar PV will be “a game changer.” It’s inevitable, they say, not unlike the march of progress in the semiconductor industry.

“No other alternative source has the same potential,” IEEE executive director James Prendergast said in a statement. ”I suspect it will be a growth limited only by supply.”

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
11
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
PV competitive?
I've heard this type of claim before, and it never seems to pan out in practice. I sure won't be holding my breath waiting ... controlled nuclear fusion, anybody? That's been "just around the corner" for > 40 years & counting. Must be a really big corner. To make PV viable, insurers will have to cover home installations. Fat chance of that happening in Florida, where insurers don't even want to insure entire homes for a reasonable price.
Posted by Starman35
15th Jun
+2 Votes
+ -
Sure, why not?
While it's healthy to have some skepticism, your logic isn't really logic.

Who cares about Florida? That's an extreme climate. We're already pretty good at transmitting energy all over the place with wires and such, it shouldn't be much of a problem to eventually power Florida from a nearby state. And furthermore, we're only talking about partial replacement of other sources to begin with making the claim a bit more believable.

Furthermore, controlled nuclear fusion NEVER had any provable, reliable, demonstrable usable advances. Solar has. It's already being adopted. The claim here is that since it's already in practice and we are making UNDENIABLE advances in the technology (undeniable because you can buy and use them NOW) that the trend indicates that it'll keep going that way for a while.

In the face of that, your skepticism looks like an awful lot like you're saying that white is black.
Posted by grassdogstudio
15th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
Nuclear Fusion...
...seems to have always been "about twenty years away". Any tech which is forecast in that sort of range is always actually going to take much longer. See domestic robots etc. Solar is out there in real commercial installations, right now. Very different situation.
Posted by steve_jonesuk@...
16th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
Hardly saving the world
11% in almost 40 years, that isn't much. Where will the other 89% come from?
Posted by philwhite42@...
15th Jun
-1 Votes
+ -
We'll NEVER get to your "100 %"
Power conversion ALWAYS carries an efficiency price tag -- except in a 'FREE POWER!" fan's wet dreams. But it is true that we should be doing much better than the current state of PV.

The tack to pursue, however, may be to accept LESS efficiency, in exchange for dramatically lowered prices on the conversion units. This would of course mean setting aside much more real estate for the "farms," but if those farms could cover, say, ALL the buildings in a city, then it might well be possible.

The tech I'm speaking of is PRINTED PV panels, which in mass, could be produced for on the order of pennies per sq. yard. At that rate, neither would the material have to be sited always in prime collection zones. It could cover EVERY FACE of a building, including the north sides, be replaced every few years if necessary, and still produce enough power to make it economical.
Posted by Lightning Joe
Updated - 16th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
Graphene in place of silicon
With the discover of graphene and it's seemingly superior transmission capabilities would it increase the power output if used instead of silicon? Just wondering. Also it is very abundant therefore should be more cost effective.
Posted by lstockstill
Updated - 15th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
so they have figured out how to make the sun shine 24x7?
It is simply not possible to make solar cheaper than hydro or fossil fuels. Since the sun does not shine at night, a backup of some sort will always be required. This means that the cost of the night time electrical generation has to be included in the cost of the solar cell. This is a well known fact to most people, evidently not to this scientist.
Posted by abear4562
15th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
The sun has already figured that out.
Batteries. Global coverage (the sun does shine 24/7, just not always on the same spot). Manage to hit an efficiency at least double that of current power supplies and there you go. All this involves are some simple equations you can do on the back of a napkin, common sense, and some attention paid to recent advancements.
Posted by grassdogstudio
15th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
You overlooked the main reasons
Fossils will be taxed and regulated to extinction. Get your valets ready, gentlemen...
Posted by d3d4E4
15th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
oil will run out some time soon
there are many ways to make energy. it is all depending how it is developed . and processed"
Posted by edward goodpeace
Updated - 15th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
there will always be a tax
no matter what kind of energy that man develops .
Posted by edward goodpeace
15th Jun
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!