Follow this blog:
RSS

How to turn a T-shirt into a battery

By | July 11, 2012, 10:36 AM PDT

Cotton that holds a charge — could this be the next big development in flexible batteries?

Flexible devices are already in development, from e-reader screens to bendy laptops. In the world of smart textiles, flexible battery systems are also part of this change — but making the full leap from the solid to fluid has remained out of our scientists’ grasps.

Perhaps not for too much longer. The journal Advanced Materials has reported a new technique, led by the University of South Carolina’s Xiaodong Li, which allows cheap, flexible fabrics to store large amounts of energy.

In the published research report, the experimental subject is a plain, cotton T-shirt. Within the following university release, Li, a professor of mechanical engineering, said:

“We wear fabric every day. One day our cotton T-shirts could have more functions; for example, a flexible energy storage device that could charge your cell phone or your iPad.”

Li developed a process that converts basic, cotton material into “highly conductive and flexible activated carbon textiles.” The fibres in the cotton are altered and made into wires and capacitors capable of storing large amounts of energy — transformed through soaking the material in flouoride and then heated in an oxygen-free environment.

Once the T-shirt was treated, dried and baked, Li’s team found the fibers were converted from cellulose to activated carbon. The oxygen-free environment prevented the material from burning or combusting during the process.

Remaining as flexible as before, by using infrared spectroscopy, the researchers discovered the carbonized material now worked as a repository for electrical current. Testing the material, small swatches were used to function as an electrode, and as a result the fibre worked well as a capacitor.

Termed “activated carbon textile”, Li reports that the material went beyond original predictons; and acts more like double-layer capacitors — also known as supercapacitors — due to the particularly high levels of energy storage possible.

However, this wasn’t enough for the team. The individual fibres were then coated with “nanoflowers” of manganese oxide. Just over a nanometre thick, these thin layers of manganese oxide enhanced the energy-storage capacities of the material even further.

“This created a stable, high-performing supercapacitor,” said Li.

According to the team, even after thousands of test charge-discharge cycles, performance didn’t diminish more than 5 percent. The T-shirts function as a pliable battery, but no longer resemble a normal, white shirt after the process, turning black as one side effect.

However, if these supercapacitors can be stacked up, there may be a future in these kinds of smart textiles - perhaps running out of battery for your smart phone while on the move may end up being a figment of the past.

Li is particularly enthusiastic about improving on the means that carbon fibres are usually created.

“Previous methods used oil or environmentally unfriendly chemicals as starting materials,” he said. “Those processes are complicated and produce harmful side products. Our method is a very inexpensive, green process.”

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
And the first lightbulb...
...used an oxidised bamboo filament in an oxygen-depleted environment until Edison got hold of it and gave us the expensive, short-lived, and inefficient incandescent using a coiled coil of wire - designed to burn out.
This was followed by the Fluorescent, also modified to give it a lifespan of a few years by the same technology. Without that cheeky little starter plug, and the coils in each end, that tube would outlast its owner - it only needs them because that's how it was designed. To be replaced, for a fee.

So many technologies are returning to their roots and their makers proclaiming themselves clever for it. All I see is a long list of failed technologies and money-spinners that preceded them, that they cant sell any more.

This brilliant idea too, is also very unfortunately destined for the dustbin, or at least modification to make it a repeat-seller unless we change the industry that will provide us with it. Simply because that industry is designed to make as much money as possible, not provide us with cheap and abundant goods, services OR freedoms.

Its a side-effect of capitalism, or of any ism you choose. You want free power? I cant invent it, I'd have to invent free before I can add power to it - and ironically that's the easy part, we're surrounded by free power. What we aren't allowed is the means to get to it.

By the way, Charlie, you could do with proof-reading your article. I'm not one to troll punctuation, but there were a few figments of imaginary English in there...
Posted by SiO2
11th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
Side Effects
Greed is not a side effect of "isms," it is a side effect of fear. When humans are no longer afraid to be part of a collective then "free" will re-emerge as a dynamic of normal human culture.
Posted by IndredKold
11th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
Nice philosophy
But that has nothing to do with the legislation, regulation or paradigm thats keeping us from our 'normal' behaviour.

It isnt normal human behaviour to compete with each other, not since we were hunter-gatherers. We developed technology as a race to stop us having to fight tooth and nail for survival.

The greed of which you speak is only manifest in those that have, the rest of us are simply trying to get by.
Any form of control that restricts anything will cause a need for it, and thats not greed. People arent greedy or afraid of each other, the majority are simply kept ignorant and unempowered by a small contingent of those that are greedy, and afraid of not having the luxuries they dont wish to share with everyone else.

If you really want to level the planet, you might want to take a look at Zeitgeist, the political arm of the Venus Project. VP's remit is nothing less than the fair redistribution of the world's resources amongst its peoples, and the application of our collective intellect and strength towards building a world based on freedoms. This is why it needs Zeitgeist, as an a-political organisation, VP doesnt have teeth and it needs them to bite the ass out of capitalism's trousers... I am a member myself.

Peace
Posted by SiO2
12th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
WE ARE THE BORG
Resistance Is Futile.
Prepare To Be Assimilated.
Posted by Dr_Zinj
12th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
Nice
Back to actual topic of the post...
A battery made of non-toxic materials would be a significant advance, even if wasn't flexible as well. Clothing that also functions as a battery would have to be washable.
Posted by theotherwill
12th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
Lithium is non-toxic
It is also recyclable.
Posted by shaunehunter
16th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
Down sides?
Of course one would have to test the effects of long-term (years) exposure to electricity against the skin. I suggest that it might be better to consider this fabric in outerwear (suit jacket, sweatshirt, than material meant to be worn against the skin.
Posted by pandolfi1
13th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
Will it attract lightening?
I don't know but with those electrons running around in the shirt.....
Posted by jtarheel
16th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
I only see the potential for a capacitor here. It is not green either.
The item described is a capacitor, not a battery.

1. It must be charged-that takes electric current, and hence energy.
2. A capacitor will discharge and lose voltage as it does so, as a hyperbolic function. They do not "live" very long and will also auto-discharge in a relatively short period of time.
3. Hydrogen Fluoride is one of the most dangerous industrial acids available. It is such a strong acid it will etch glass. What does one do with the waste batch of HF solution, and don't forget about the dangerous HF gas produced by baking the cotton.

In conclusion, how does one turn a capacitor into a battery, and how green is a process involving Hydrogen Flouride gas?
Posted by Arctic Char
19th Jul
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!