Follow this blog:
RSS

High-temp superconductivity turns 25

By | April 18, 2011, 9:23 AM PDT

High-temperature superconductivity is turning 25 years old.

In 1986, two IBM scientists—J. Georg Bednorz and K. Alex Muller—discovered superconductivity in an oxide material at -397 deg F. That temperature was 50 percent higher than the previous mark. Superconductivity was discovered in 1911 by Heike Kamerlingh Onnes, a Dutch physicist. Onnes discovered that superconductivity occurs when metals like tin and lead are cooled to absolute zero (-459.67 deg F).

Just a year after that discovery, Bednorz and Muller were awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics. Indeed, the high-temp superconductivity discovery had applications in measurement technology, electrotechnology and microelectronics.

Bednorz and Muller published “Possible High Tc Superconductivity in the Ba - La - Cu - O System”(2) was received by the peer-reviewed journal Zeitschrift fur Physik B on April 17, 1986.

Applications today include:

  • Magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) scanners.
  • American Superconductor is using high-temp superconductor wire for energy efficient cables (right). These lines are being used in the Tres Amigas Project, which connects three power grids to create a renewable energy market.
  • Magnetic Levitating Trains, which are being tested in Asia. These trains use magnets to levitate above the steel rails.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Larry Dignan

About Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is the editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan

Editor-in-Chief

Larry Dignan is editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet and ZDNet. He is also editorial director of TechRepublic. Previously, he was an editor at eWeek, Baseline and CNET News. He has written for WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, New York Times and Financial Planning. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and the University of Delaware. He is based in New York but resides in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan
Larry Dignan does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: High-temp superconductivity turns 25
The simple truth is that high-temp superconductivity just never delivered the huge leaps in energy savings that were promised. It has a hard time maintaining its superconductivity when carrying large currents. Even the 5 GW DC superconductive lines used in the Tres Amigas Project are short haul, only a few miles in length.
Posted by zackers
18th Apr 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: High-temp superconductivity turns 25
I don't think you understand how superconductivity works... It
doesn't matter how much current is carried, it doesn't affect the
temperature of the conductor at all. The only problem is keeping the
entire cable cool enough.
Posted by fabspro
18th Apr 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: High-temp superconductivity turns 25
The problem isn't the current, it's the magnetic field generated by the current. In the presence of a strong magnetic field, the superconducting property breaks down.
Posted by kevinrs1
18th Apr 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Got that right, Kevinrs1
I'm trying to self-teach on superconductors in my not so copious spare time. I've read about high magnetic fields from the current causing the loss of superconductivity at a certain threshold; but I'm not clear enough on how that happens to be able to explain it to others.

The highest temperature superconductor I've been able to uncover is palladium hydride (PdH) that's been saturated with hydrogen. It becomes a superconductor at 260K, far above the temperature of liquid nitrogen (77K), so cooling it is simple and relatively cheap.

Now I figure a disk made of palladium hydride and cooled to superductivity would work perfectly for testing the Droscher-Hauser gravito-magnetic drive model. Unfortunately, the damn stuff costs as much as gold; so getting 300Kg of the stuff to build a drive prototype is prohibitively high for a backyard tinkerer, and even for low budget colleges. Pd107 would work, and ought to be cheaper, even though it's mildly radioactive; but the nuclear industry government controllers (and the Anti-Nuclear Eco-freaks) would never go for it.
Posted by Dr_Zinj
19th Apr 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!