Follow this blog:
RSS

Good idea? Feds propose grading cars on fuel efficiency

By | August 30, 2010, 5:21 PM PDT

You may be able to kiss those miles per gallon stickers on new vehicles goodbye. In 2012, you may be seeing letter grades, A through D, if proposed rule changes go into effect.

The Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Transportation have proposed new fuel economy labels with simple letter grades to rate gas mileage. The proposed rule is now open for public comment.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said:

This is the beginning of the conversation, not the end. We are asking the American people to tell us what they need to make the best economic and environmental decisions when they are buying a new car.

According to the EPA, two labels are being considered:

  • One label design (top right) assigns a letter grade to reveal a car’s overall fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions. The label will also provide and estimate of fuel cost relative to an average gas vehicle.
  • The second label keeps the MPG and annual fuel cost information in the current label, but offers new comparison data (bottom right).

For electric vehicles and hybrids, the agencies are proposing to show energy use by translating electricity consumption into a MPG equivalent.

The proposed rules, EPA statement and labels are worth a read. The grades would only measure tailpipe emissions not so called upstream emissions, which cover refining fuel and electricity generation.

Automobile manufacturers may not like the proposed system because the letter grades may look like a government endorsement. Meanwhile, some small cars would get C’s—not exactly the image automakers want to promote for a small car.

The big question is whether these government letter grades would influence your buying decision.

One thing is certain the there aren’t many A rated cars in the current fleet. From an EPA PDF explaining the ratings distribution:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Larry Dignan

About Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan

Editor-in-Chief

Larry Dignan is editor-in-chief of SmartPlanet and ZDNet. He is also editorial director of TechRepublic. Previously, he was an editor at eWeek, Baseline and CNET News. He has written for WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, New York Times and Financial Planning. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and the University of Delaware. He is based in New York but resides in Pennsylvania.

Follow him on Twitter.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan
Larry Dignan does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Good idea? Feds propose grading cars on fuel efficiency
Interesting. I have to wonder about fuel efficiency effecting not just new cars, but used cars. I found this idea for a "mechanical hybrid" if you could call if that. Check it out http://bit.ly/b39VaT Is something like that possible? Thanks for your thoughts.
Posted by mastermo411
30th Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Good idea? Feds propose grading cars on fuel efficiency
A-D? Why not A-F. Hummer = F.
I like this grading system. Easy to see and understand.
Posted by ITOdeed
31st Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Bad Idea - No basis in reality
Letter grades? Why not go with the feel good method that they use in schools: "Need Improvement", "Meets Expectations", "Exceeds Standards" - would be just as meaningful and useless.
A 5 ton pickup truck capable of hauling 3/4 ton of material is NEVER going to get as good gas mileage as 1 1/2 ton car barely capable of hauling two people around - and it gets a "D" when the car gets an "A"?

If you eliminated all the mandated safety features - which would cut out around at least 1 ton of material that goes into every passenger car - that would improve mileage ratings 10 MPG (US gallons, not Imperial).

I've seen the same make and model of car climb from 2,200 lbs in total weight (getting 36 MPG in 1976) to 3,800 lbs now getting 28 MPG - and there was a hugh jump in engine performance in those 34 years. The extra weight in noise, glass, crash, engine and exhaust requriements offset any gains by a large margin.

This is one reason why European cars ALWAYS get more mileage - they don't have the same safety -WEIGHT- requiremetns that US cars have.

They want to take something useful and make it meaningless and arbitray based on what THEY want people to do - buy vehicles that do not meet the needs of people.

Why don't they just change the fuel efficienty to kimometers per liter and really become useful for the AMERICAN public.
They are changing it because they can, not to make it useful for people.
Posted by TAPhilo
31st Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Good idea? Feds propose grading cars on fuel efficiency
Sounds a bit silly to me. Folks who buy the low mileage cars will
buy them whether it's on the label as MPG or a D; they like the car
and can afford the gas. If I was a cynic, I would say it's a move to
be followed by a tax on the vehicle based on it's letter grade ...
maybe I am a cynic.
Posted by bdubya
31st Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Silly
It appears as though the letter grading system is based upon a
politically based "judgement" as opposed to a utility factor or just
plain factual data. This should suit people who wish to the
government handle all of their thinking just fine.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
31st Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Good idea? Feds propose grading cars on fuel efficiency
It is a good step in the right direction but they need to not leave out the
safety rating. A rice burner can not be compared for mpg with a town
car family minivan or a work truck. They need to have the grading in
categories not across.
Posted by pflorin@...
31st Aug 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Good idea--shows a comparison
Currently, just showing the mpgs doesn't allow one to compare based on the national average mpg. I don't know what the national average is, but I want a car that is better than the average and this little sticker would help me figure that out. A similar method is used for appliances and it helps people decide which appliance uses less electricity. I just don't see any downside at all.
Posted by waltsyd
31st Aug 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!