Follow this blog:
RSS

GM invests $494 million in next-gen Ecotec engine

By | February 19, 2010, 9:53 AM PST

General Motors said it will invest more than $494 million in three U.S. plants to produce the next generation of its fuel-efficient Ecotec engine.

The move marks GM’s focus on fuel consumption and emissions reduction across its portfolio.

The company will invest $425 million in its Tonawanda plant for the capacity to make 370,000 next-gen Ecotec engines per year, as well as another $59 million in its Defiance plant (capacity: 188,000) and $10.5 million in its Bay City plant to make the engine’s connecting rod.

“The investment in state-of-the-art four-cylinder engines is another example of GM’s commitment to replace larger-displacement engines with more compact, advanced four-cylinder engines that optimize fuel savings and performance,” said Denise Johnson, GM vice president of labor relations, in prepared remarks.

The investment is specifically for two models of the Ecotec engine, which use direct fuel injection, variable valve timing and turbocharging to save energy.

The current Ecotec model is used in the Buick LaCrosse, Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain, and is available in 2.0-, 2.2- and 2.4-liter displacements.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: GM invests $494 million in next-gen Ecotec engine
Why isn't anyone working on a turbine engine hooked up to an electric generator hooked up to a battery? The turbine is much more effecient than a piston engine, but it is not good at variable speed. But as a power source for electricity generation, it would excel. Small, cheap, versatile in fuel sources. The car would run off of an electric motor hooked up to the batteries. The turbine would not have to generate enough power to run the car. Only enough to extend the range of the car, thus reducing the number of batteries. Car would still plug in to the power grid off-hours.
Posted by raykirk@...
22nd Feb 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: GM invests $494 million in next-gen Ecotec engine
@raykirk: My understanding is that turbines require costly materials and high precision to manufacture. They are simply not economical at this stage, even though they have operational advantages over conventional engines.
Posted by zackers
23rd Feb 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Wankel?
Maybe it is time to re-discover the rotary engine?
Posted by FiOS-Dave
24th Feb 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!