Follow this blog:
RSS

GE hits cleaner coal energy milestone; ships turbines to major U.S. power plant

By | April 30, 2010, 8:03 AM PDT

General Electric on Friday announced the shipment of another advanced turbine to a U.S. power plant, calling the move a “major milestone” in cleaner coal.

The second of two GE 7F syngas turbines is headed to Duke Energy’s integrated gasification combined-cycle, or IGCC, power plant in Edwardsport, Ind.

Set for completion in 2012, the facility is expected to be the largest, most advanced commercial IGCC plant in the world. It’s expected to generate up to 618 megawatts of electricity, or enough power to 500,000 homes.

Duke Energy president Catherine Heigel called the plant “one of the cleanest and most efficient coal-fired plants in the world.”

IGCC technology converts coal to gas, where pollutants such as mono-nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, mercury and particulate are removed.

The tech allows the plant to capture carbon dioxide prior to combustion, cutting down on greenhouse gas emissions compared to a traditional coal plant.

In a statement, GE Power & water gasification general manager Monte Atwell said the technology needs federal support and incentives to compete on the world stage.

“Already, China is emerging as a world leader in the construction of more efficient, less polluting coal plants,” Atwell said. “If America doesn’t act swiftly, the opportunity to export U.S. IGCC technology to coal-rich nations like China and India may be lost.”

IGCC technology is also used in plants in Barstow, Calif. and Polk County, Fla.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GE hits cleaner coal energy milestone; ships turbines to major U.S. power plant
every home consumes 1kW power?? I dont think so.
Posted by aaaqqq1234
3rd May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GE hits cleaner coal energy milestone; ships turbines to major U.S. power plant
> ..... The tech allows the plant to capture carbon
> dioxide prior to combustion, .......

HUH? Say again? Capture carbon dioxide PRIOR to combustion?

Frankly, I can't help but suspect GE is promoting a technology in which they have a vested interest, in the name of environmentalism. This is fundamentally dishonest, really.
Posted by AlexKovnat
3rd May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GE hits cleaner coal energy milestone; ships turbines to major U.S. power plant
There is no such thing as "clean coal" so I guess they mean "slightly less dirty" coal power.
Posted by lylelwr
3rd May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GE hits cleaner coal energy milestone; ships turbines to major U.S. power plant
CAP & TRADE ENSURES THE STATUS QUO FOR OPEC AND TERRORISM
Isn?t the timing interesting? With the world in recession and US unemployment figures hovering around 10% the EPA exceeds its authority and determines CO2 is a pollutant that must be regulated.

But America has natural gas and coal in abundance and could eliminate dependence on foreign oil, stop sending billions to countries that sponsor terrorism and save 100s of billions on unnecessary Middle East wars.
And it is estimated that every billion in trade deficit equals 13,000 jobs lost. Washington could keep money, technology and jobs in the US by reducing the trade imbalance.

FYI: during the decades America enjoyed great prosperity; no concern was expressed for the plight of the uninsured.
Posted by Repeal
4th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: GE hits cleaner coal energy milestone; ships turbines to major U.S. power plant
Another reason why GE blows. The great world contributor to pollution, upfront in the technology to clean it up. All in the name of profit. Wouldn't it be nice if they built their research facilities on the Brownfield?s they?ve created all throughout the entire northeast?
Posted by Kevincpower
4th May 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!